Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T10CM01272
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/09/2010 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: T10CM01272 601 and 611 S Meyer Avenue Remodel Existing Duplex Structure TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 09, 2010 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. The same comments were made by zoning. Your response comments did not address any of the zoning comments made on the last review. The repsonse comments must be specifically addressed to teh zoning reviewer(s). 1. The proposed project must be reviewed and approved through the HPZ review. If this process has been completed and approved provide a copy of the decision letter as well as the HPZ approved and stamped plans. The approved and stamped plans must be submitted to zoning for a zoning review and stamps once the plans meet compliance. 2. The right of way issue does not appear to have been resolved. It appears that the north portion of the building as well as the gated and walled area is within the COT right of way. Provide the documentation that allows the building to remain in the ROW or provide documentation of the purchase of COT ROW. If neither has been done I have included a copy of the Real Estate Services Information and Application for your convenience for either a lease or purchase of the area in question. I would suggest contacting Jim Rossi for assistance with this process. 3. In the review of the plan it is clear that there is a discrepancy with the property boundary as depicted on the plans and the Pima County Assessor's map. This plan does not have a surveyor's seal so it is not clear if the boundary is correct. An Alta survey may be required in order to verify these discrepancies. I have attached a copy of the Assessor's map for your review. 4. If the boundary as depicted on the plan is correct it appears that there is access over the east portion of this property which is being used by the adjacent owners or tenants. If so provide documentation for any easement or cross access. See a copy of the attached aerial. If there is an easement or cross access, provide the information on the plan such as docket and page of the recordation info for the easement and delineate the area of the easement in a surveyable manner. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and additional requested documents |
| 08/12/2010 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Denied | STILL NEED WASTEWATER 5TH FLOOR CREDIT EVALUATION can approved if customer does not want credits. Please notify WWM if credits are nor to be used |
| 08/25/2010 | KEN VAN KARSEN | BUILDING-RESIDENTIAL | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 09/22/2010 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 09/22/2010 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |