Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T10CM01245
Parcel: 111050770

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: SITE

Permit Number - T10CM01245
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
05/10/2010 DAVE MANN FIRE REVIEW Denied Fire Comments:

Show the nearest fire hydrant. If greater than 300 foot hose lay to any part of the building a new hydrant or fire sprinklers are required.
05/11/2010 BIANCA RAMIREZ ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied DATE: May 21, 2010
SUBJECT: Site Plan Review
TO: Alex Enoch
LOCATION: 3137 N Palo Verde, T13S, R14E, Section 33, Ward 3
REVIEWERS: Bianca Ramirez, CFM
ACTIVITY: T10CM01245 (First Review)


RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Site Plan

SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed site plan for the above referenced property. Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the site plan at this time. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal.

Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the site plan.
Site Plan:

1. The most recent aerial photo of the building does not match what is depicted on the site plan. Please modify site plan to represent all existing and proposed structures. If any structures are being removed from site then provide demolition permit number on site plan. Ensure that both proposed and existing buildings are identified and labeled correctly.
2. Please verify that all lot dimensions and bearings are depicted on site plan accurately per D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.5
3. Provide all existing and proposed buildings and structures, including location, size, height, overhangs, canopies, and use per D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.6.
4. In Keynote 4 provide COT Detail reference for curb or identify height of curb accordingly.
5. Show all points of egress and ingress including locations and width of driveways and parking area access lanes (P.A.A.L.) per D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.11. Since the only access to the parking for the site is an adjacent parcel, provide cross access agreement or provide recordation information for vehicle access agreement on site plan.
6. Keynote 9 - Clearly indicate whether the sidewalk is an existing or proposed sidewalk.
7. DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.11: Revise the site plan to show the minimum 12-foot separation that is required between adjacent driveways. Show and label the existing driveways adjacent to the site and/or indicate distance to adjacent driveways to verify the 12-foot minimum width. Refer to Tucson Code (TC) Chapter 25-39 for curb cut and driveway requirements.
8. Label radius for driveway curb returns on site plan.
9. DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.12: Revise the site plan to show the required pedestrian circulation path that is required from the proposed buildings to the required pedestrian circulation path located along Palo Verde Av.
10. Verify that location, type, size, and height of existing and proposed signage is clearly identified and labeled accordingly on site plan D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.13.
11. Provide dimensioned the required onsite maneuvering area(s) for the loading zone that is identified adjacent to the proposed building per D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.14. DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.14.
12. DS Sec.2.02.2.1.A.16: Provide drainage arrows and locations of all concentration points. Specifically show roof drainage and roof down spout locations proposed for all buildings at pedestrian circulation areas. A detail for the dimension of the proposed scuppers that are used for collecting onsite roof drainage at all pedestrian sidewalk is required; refer to City of Tucson details. Any scuppers proposed under the sidewalk will be designed and constructed to convey the 10-year flood flow. Provide a drainage statement showing scupper calculations that demonstrate that the 10-year flood flow is contained under the sidewalk.
13. Clearly indicate the estimated cut & fill quantities on site plan per D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.17. If no cut and fill is taking place indicate the quantity of zero (0) on the plan. Estimated cut and Fill: Cut = 0 and Fill = 0 will suffice.
14. Clearly identify dimensions of right-of-way on site plan per D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.19.
15. DS Sec. 2-05.2.4.H.2: Provide the right-of-way (ROW) recordation information for Palo Verde Ave.
16. Correct street name to read Palo Verde Av and label as a Local.
17. Verify that all easement(s) of record have been graphically shown on the plan together with recording docket and page reference per D.S. 2-02.2.1.20.
18. Dimension from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways, and utility lines per D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.21.
19. Verify that all fences, walls, and/or vegetation for screening and sight visibility are identified by type, material, height, location and spacing per D.S. 2-02.2.1.27.
20. Provide the site plan activity number in the lower right hand corner of each sheet of the site plan.'
21. Show refuse container location, size, and access thereto fully dimensioned per D.S. 2-02.2.1.32 and D.S. 6-01.0. OR Provide approval from Environmental Services for roll out containers.
22. Standard Note: A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information.
23. All symbols on plans need to be indicated in legend. Indicate all symbols in legend.
24. Sheet C2.0 Detail 2 Handicap sign revise FINE $532.
25. DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.8: Provide wheel stop curbing for parking spaces. Wheel stop barriers must be used at all parking spaces to prevent encroachment into landscape or pedestrian circulation areas. Provide wheel stop for loading zone parking space located within the southwest portion of site.
26. DS Sec. 3-05.2.0.B.1 ensure minimum Parking space is standard of 18' X 8.5' with 2.5' overhang is met.
27. Please provide location of existing fire hydrants within three hundred (300) feet of the site boundaries D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.33.
28. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.11 Provide a parking area access lane (PAAL) width dimension for the PAAL adjacent to the northwest most proposed parking space to the existing parking spaces to the north.
29. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 Per D.S. 3-05.2.2.D a minimum distance of three (3) feet is required between the proposed south back of spur and property line.
30. Within keynotes provide widths and references to details, please see redlines.
31. Additional comments may be forthcoming.

If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4928 or Bianca.Ramirez@tucsonaz.gov

Bianca C. Ramirez
Engineering Associate
City of Tucson/Development Services Department
201 N. Stone Avenue
P.O. Box 27210
Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210
(520) 837-4928 office
(520) 879-8010 fax
05/12/2010 RONALD BROWN ZONING HC REVIEW Denied 1. The detectable warning strip placed at the North end of the marked crossing need be only 2' wide as depicted by detail 4/C2.0. Please coordinate details.
2. The marked crossing plus the sidewalk ramp at the South end of the marked crossing can not take the place of the accessible parking aisle. The aisle must be the full length of the accessible parking space as per ANSI 117.1, Section 502.4.3. Please redesign and locate the ramp within the sidewalk, accessible route, area.
3. Please provide an accessible route to the Palo Verde Blvd right of way, pedestrian way.
4. Please show spot grades throughout the accessible routes to show slope compliance with ANSI 117.1, Section 403.3.
5. The one accessible parking space provided must be "Van Accessible". Please provide a "Van Accessible" sign below the main accessible notification.
END OF REVIEW
05/18/2010 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Denied PDSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: Outer Limits School - Classroom Addition
T10CM01245
Site Plan (1st Review)

TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 18, 2010

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.

1. This site plan was reviewed for compliance with the City of Tucson Development Standards (D.S.) and Land Use Code (LUC) for full code compliance..

2. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.5 The north and south property lines show a distance of 165', per the Assessor's Record Map and scaling the property line this dimension should be 175'

3. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.6 Provide the height for all structures on site, existing and proposed, this includes the existing shade structure. As this project is a change of use all existing and proposed structures are required to meet the perimeter yard setbacks based on the perimeter yard indicator "DD".

4. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.7 Until the height for all structures on site, existing and proposed is provided, see comment 3, the required perimeter yard setback to the south and east property line cannot be verified.

5. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.8 As this project is proposed to be a stand alone site all required parking must be located on site. That said there are two (2) of the required thirteen (13) vehicle parking spaces located on the parcel to the north. If the parking is to remain partially on the adjacent parcel full code compliance will be required for this parcel and the adjacent parcel to the north.

6. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.8 As the only access to the parking for this project is across an adjacent parcel provide either a recorded cross access agreement or show an vehicle access easement on the plan along with the recordation information on the plan.

7. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.9 Demonstrate on the plan/detail how the requirements of D.S. 2-09.5.2 Provide a five (5) foot wide access aisle for the Class 2 bicycle parking, see Figure 9.

8. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.11 Provide a parking area access lane (PAAL) width dimension for the PAAL adjacent to the northwest most proposed parking space to the existing parking spaces to the north.

9. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 Per D.S. 2-08.3.1 Provide a continuous pedestrian circulation path/accessible route from the structure to the sidewalk in the right-of-way (ROW) along Palo Verde Blvd.

10. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 Per D.S. 3-05.2.2.D A minimum distance of three (3) feet will be provided between the proposed south back of spur and the property line.

11. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.13 If applicable show the location, type, size, and height of existing and proposed free standing signage.

12. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.19 Provide a fully dimensioned ROW.

13. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.20 If applicable all easements of record must be graphically shown on the plan together with recording docket and page reference.

14. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.25 If applicable show all existing and proposed site lighting layout and type.

15. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.31 Provide the existing use on the plan.

16. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.32 Show the location of the refuse container on site.

17. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.2 Under "Parking Calculation Note 2" the "Gross Floor Area" is called out as 2,533 S.F. Under "Project Data" "SQUARE FOOTAGE" the total is listed as 2,561 S.F. Clarify what square footage is correct.

18. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.3 Per Development Designator "29" and LUC Section 3.2.3.2.B Lot Coverage is not applicable, remove from the plan.

19. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.3 Per Development Designator "29" and LUC Section 3.2.3.2.B the allowed Floor Area Ratio (FAR) is 0.50 not 0.35. Revise the FAR calculation.
20. Depending on how the above comments are addressed addition comments may be forth coming.
If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956.

C:\planning\site\t10cm01245

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and additional requested documents.
05/24/2010 ANDREW CONNOR NPPO REVIEW Denied Provide acceptable documentation, which clearly indicates that the project will not impact Protected Native Plants. Such documentation includes photographs of the site taken from all sides of the property per DS 2-15.2.0.C
05/24/2010 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied 1. This site is reviewed under full code compliance all landscape requirements apply. This project is proposed to be a stand alone site; all required parking must be located on site. If any parking is located on the adjacent parcels then both sites will need to meet full code compliance.

2. Submit previously approved landscape plan(s) for reference.

3. A 30" continuous screen along street frontages for vehicle use area must be provided per LUC Table 3.7.2-I.

4. Within the vehicular use area, every parking space shall be located within forty (40) feet of the trunk of a canopy tree (as measured from the center of the tree trunk) per LUC 3.7.2.3.A.1.

5. Indicate location, size, and name of existing vegetation to remain in place.

6. Provide acceptable documentation, which clearly indicates that the project will not impact Protected Native Plants. Such documentation includes photographs of the site taken from all sides of the property per DS 2-15.2.0.C

7. The site plan and landscape plan must show identical site layout to avoid conflict between the two plans. Ensure that all changes to the site plan are reflected on the landscape plan.

8. Additional comments may apply.
06/08/2010 RICK MYERS PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Where the finish floor elevation is less than 12 inches above the elevation of the next upstream manhole in the public sewer or private sewer collection system, a backwater valve shall be installed in the building drain or branch of the building drain serving that floor. Floors discharging from above that reference point shall not discharge through the backwater valve. Section 710.1, UPC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson. 2. Provide the rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole and the first floor elevation. Determine the need for a backwater valve per Section 710.1, UPC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson. 3

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
06/10/2010 DELMA ROBEY OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
06/10/2010 SUE REEVES REJECT SHELF Completed