Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - SITE
Permit Number - T10CM01237
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/22/2010 | RONALD BROWN | HC | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/25/2010 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Outer Limits School - Classroom Addition T10CM01237 Site Plan (2nd Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 25, 2010 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. This site plan was reviewed for compliance with the City of Tucson Development Standards (D.S.) and Land Use Code (LUC) for full code compliance for the entire site. 2. There are numerous shade structures, covered walkways, etc. not shown on the plan. These structures are not shown on the last approved site plan. Provide a copy of the plan that approved these structures or show them as to be permitted on this plan and if applicable include the square footage in all applicable site plan calculations. 3. The vehicle use area shown along the south property line as "EXISTING PAVING AND PARKING AREA TO REMAIN" is not shown on the last approved site plan. Based on the last approved site plan this additional vehicle use area is approximately a 40% expansion of vehicle use area. Per LUC Section 3.3.3.12.B If an expansion is twenty-five (25) percent or greater or if a series of expansions cumulatively results in a twenty-five (25) percent or greater expansion in land area, floor area, lot coverage, or vehicular use area, the requirements of this Division apply to the entire site. That said this is a full code compliance review for the entire site. 4. As this review is full code for the entire site due to a greater than 25% expansion of vehicle use area the existing Board of Adjustment for Variance is no longer valid. 5. There appears to be a building expansion, near the center of the building, along the north side. This area is not shown on the last approved site plan. Provide a copy of the plan that approved this area of expansion or show it as to be permitted on this plan and if applicable include the square footage in all applicable site plan calculations. 6. This comment was not addressed. Show all structures on site, this includes the shade structures and covered walkways, and provide the following information. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.6 For all existing and proposed buildings and structures, provide the size, height, overhangs, canopies, and use. This includes all shade structures. 7. Clearly show what type of barricades are proposed for the proposed parking shown at the southwest corner of the project. Per D.S. 3-05.2.2.D if the barricade is over six (6) inches in height an addition three (3) foot is required from the back of the back-up spur. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 Per D.S. 3-05.2.3.C.1 A vehicular use area must be provided with post barricades or wheel stop curbing designed to prevent parked vehicles from extending beyond the property lines; damaging adjacent landscaping, walls, or buildings; or overhanging adjacent sidewalk areas or unpaved areas on or off site and to prevent vehicles from driving onto unimproved portions of the site. That said the proposed parking shown at the southwest corner of the project requires some type of barrier to prevent vehicles from accessing the unimproved areas to the east and south. 8. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 Per D.S. 2-08-3.1 Provide the required pedestrian circulation/accessible route to Palo Verde Blvd. 9. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 There is an area of striped pavement shown on the most recent aerial photo and shown on the last approved site plan, just east of Bldg. B that is not shown on the site plan. Is this pavement to be removed or to remain? 10. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 Keynote 4 calls out a chain link fence to remain. This fence blocks access to the proposed vehicle parking spaces located near the southwest corner of the project. 11. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.14 Per LUC Section 3.4.5.3 a 12 X 35 loading space is required. 12. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.32 Show the refuse container enclosure on the site plan. 13. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.2 Under "FLOOR AREA CALCULATION" and "PARKING CALCULATION" it appears that the gross floor area is called out as 8,899, under "PERCENTAGE OF PROJECT EXPANSION" the gross floor area appears to be 7,343, clarify what square footage is correct. 14. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.4 The vehicle parking space calculation appears to be incorrect. Once the gross floor area is clarified the vehicle and bicycle parking calculation can be verified. 15. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.6 The vehicle use area expansion calculation is not correct. Based on the last approved site plan the vehicle use area was listed as 9,679 Sq. Ft. this plan shows "TOTAL PARKING AREA (CURRENT): as 12,321, clarify the difference. See comment 3. 16. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.6 The building area expansion calculation is not correct. Based on the last approved site plan the building area was listed as 6,284 Sq. Ft. this plan shows "TOTAL NEW BUILDING AREA (CURRENT): as 6,844, clarify the difference. See comment 5. 17. Depending on how each comment is addressed addition comments may be forth coming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956. C:\planning\site\t10cm02211 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan. |
| 10/29/2010 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 11/01/2010 | BIANCA RAMIREZ | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: November 1, 2010 SUBJECT: Classroom Addition and Interior Remodel TO: Alex Enoch LOCATION: 3472 E Fort Lowell Road, T13S, R14E, Section 33, Ward 3 REVIEWERS: Bianca Ramirez, CFM ACTIVITY: T10CM01237 (Secondt Review) RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Site Plan SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed site plan for the above referenced property. Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the site plan at this time. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the site plan. Site Plan: 1. Complied 2. Revise keynote 1 to include reference to COT standard detail. Comment: Provide reference to the actual City of Tucson detail that pertains to your project, provide standard detail number. 3. Revise keynote 4 and 5 to include height of existing fence and wall. Comment: Existing wall appears to be located within site visibility triangles. Show that existing walls were previously permitted. 4. Complied 5. Provide all existing and proposed buildings and structures, size, height, overhangs, canopies, and use per D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.6. Comment: Show all structures on the site in the plan view of site plan. 6. Complied. 7. Complied 8. Complied 9. Label all points of egress and ingress including locations and width of driveways and parking area access lanes (P.A.A.L.) per D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.11. Comment: Clearly label PAAL 10. DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.11 & DS Sec.3-01.3.2.C: Depict and label radii for concrete curbs though out site plan and add barrier at edge of PAAL in southwest corner of site plan to prevent cars from going outside PAAL limits. Comments: Include radaii for curbs for driveways and all other curbs throughout the plan. 11. DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.12: Revise the site plan to show the required 6-foot wide sidewalk with curb along the street frontage of Fort Lowell Road. Revise dimensions on site plan to show the 6-foot width. Per the adopted Mayor and Counsel policy all sidewalks along MS&R right-of-ways for arterial and collector streets require 6-foot wide sidewalks. Comments: According to zoning - 25% expansion may be occurring, revision required in order to determine. Comments will remain until clarification of expansion has been provided to zoning for clarification. 12. DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.12: Revise the site plan to show the required pedestrian circulation path that is required from the proposed buildings to the required pedestrian circulation path located along Palo Verde Ave. Comments: Clarify actual name of Palo Verde, Ave is showing but Blvd is indicated on site plan. Please clarify and revise to correct street suffix. 13. Please verify that location, type, size, and height of any existing and proposed signage has been provided per D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.13. Comment: Provide distance between sign and edge of Parking space, ensure 24' PAAL. 14. Provide Drainage patterns and finished grades per D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.16. Comments: Should 25% expansion requirements apply finished grades and drainage patterns will need to be provided throughout the plan, including roof drainage to ensure and drainage across sidewalks are addressed by installing scuppers. 15. Complied 16. DS Sec.2.02.2.1.A.16: Provide drainage arrows and locations of all concentration points. Specifically show roof down spout locations proposed buildings at pedestrian circulation areas. A detail for the dimension of the proposed scuppers that are used for collecting onsite roof drainage at all pedestrian sidewalk is required; refer to City of Tucson details. Any scuppers proposed under the sidewalk will be designed and constructed to convey the 10-year flood flow. Provide a drainage statement showing scupper calculations that demonstrate that the 10-year flood flow is contained under the sidewalk. Comments: Show roof drainage to indicate where roof drainage is going. 17. Complied 18. Complied 19. Complied 20. Complied 21. Complied 22. Label the any future sidewalk and curb areas on the site plan to demonstrate that all improvements are located outside of the future right-of-way. Comments: Label future right-of-way if existing and future are the same, label accordingly. 23. Verify that all easement of record have been graphically shown on the plan together with recording docket and page reference per D.S. 2-02.2.1.20. Provide on the site plan all easements for existing and proposed utilities (water, gas, electric) and public/private sewer lines. The easements must be shown graphically on the plan together with recording docket and page reference. Reference all easements to detail and/or notes. Standard Note: Will remain until all other comments have been addressed. 24. Please provide existing topographic contours at intervals not exceeding two (2) feet and/or spot elevations as pertinent and Bench Mark based on City of Tucson Datum, including City Field Book and page number per D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.23. Provide contour interval. Comment: Provide contour interval on site plan. 25. Complied 26. Verify that all fences, walls, or vegetation for screening are provided with sight visibility, type, material, height, location and spacing per D.S. 2-02.2.1.27. Comments: Fence located within sight visibility triangle, show that fence was permitted. 27. Complied 28. Show refuse container location, size, and access thereto fully dimensioned per D.S. 2-02.2.1.32 and D.S. 6-01.0. Comments: Show refuse container location, size, and access thereto fully dimensioned per D.S. 2-02.2.1.32 and D.S. 6-01.0. 29. General Note: Be advised that a permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. Comments: Standard note to remain until all comments have been addressed. 30. Add note: "Depress all landscaped areas 6" maximum for water harvesting". Comments: Note to remain until proof that full code compliance is not required. 31. Additional comments may be forthcoming. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4928 or Bianca.Ramirez@tucsonaz.gov Bianca C. Ramirez Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 837-4928 office (520) 879-8010 fax |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11/04/2010 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 11/04/2010 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |