Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T10CM01237
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/17/2010 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Outer Limits School - Classroom Addition T10CM01237 Building Plan (2nd Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 17, 2010 1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. A Site submittal is required for this project, .i.e. a site card. 3. Zoning could not verify that the building plan was in compliance with the approved site plan.. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped site plan with the next building plan submittal. 4. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved and stamped site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 C:\planning\grading\t10cm01237.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: |
| 09/20/2010 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 3); SHEET S1.0 (FRAMING PLAN): HOW DO THESE CALCULATIONS RELATE TO THIS PROJECT? THE CALCULATION DESIGNS 16" DEEP I-JOISTS AT 16" OC FOR THE ROOF SUPPORT, BUT THIS DOESN'T MATCH THE TYPE A TRUSSES AT 24" OC PER THE FRAMING PLAN. IS THIS AN ALTERNATE DESIGN THAT WAS NOT USED? CLARIFY AND SHOW ON THE DRAWINGS. 2. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 4); SHEET S1.0 (FRAMING PLAN): WHERE IS THIS BEAM LOCATED (CALCULATIONS INDICATE "EXISTING AREA")? IS THIS AN ALTERNATE DESIGN THAT WAS NOT USED? CLARIFY AND SHOW ON THE DRAWINGS. 3. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 5); SHEET S1.0 (FRAMING PLAN): WHERE IS THIS BEAM LOCATED (CALCULATIONS INDICATE "EXISTING ROOF RAFTER")? CLARIFY AND SHOW ON THE DRAWINGS. 4. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 6); SHEET S1.0 (FRAMING PLAN): WHERE IS THIS BEAM LOCATED (CALCULATIONS INDICATE "EXISTING AREA ROOF BEAM")? CLARIFY AND SHOW ON THE DRAWINGS. 5. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 8); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 2): SHEET 2 INDICATES WIND PRESSURE OF 12.8 PSF OR 17.8 PSF ON WALLS, WHILE SHEET 8 INDICATES WIND PRESSURE OF 15.5 PSF. CLARIFY AND REVISE CALCULATIONS AS REQUIRED. 6. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 09/21/2010 | ERIC NEWCOMB | HC | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/30/2010 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Third request: show that the addition can be maintained at 68 degrees Fahrenheit on a design day. 2. The fan coil requires outside air to ventilate the room. Show the outside air duct on the drawing. Reference: Sections 106.3.1 and 403.3, IMC 2006. 3. Revise detail 1/M1.0 to show how the fan coil is to be supported in this location. Reference: Section 106.3.1, IMC 2006. |