Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T10CM01189
Parcel: 117170090

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: RESUBMITTAL

Permit Number - T10CM01189
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
07/01/2010 BIANCA RAMIREZ ENGINEERING REVIEW Approved
07/01/2010 TERRY STEVENS ZONING REVIEW Approved
07/02/2010 RONALD BROWN BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Approved
07/02/2010 LEERAY HANLY HC REVIEW Approv-Cond "Existing parking is non-conforming and may not be altered without full conformance to the LUC; full conformance is technically impossible given the site constraints. Additional accessibility is being provide to these historic buildings to the fullest extent technically feasible as addressed during meetings with the Building Official. Reference IBC 3406.1, 3407.1, 3409.1 exception, and 3409.4"

ALSO SEE ATTACHED APPEAL FOR ACCESSIBILITY INTO UNITS
07/02/2010 GERRY KOZIOL WWM REVIEW Approved
07/08/2010 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Select a consistent method for determining the fixture units and water demand; mixing UPC fixture units with IPC fixture units will not result in realistic demand values. The fixture units from the IPC are not the same as the fixture units in the UPC and the demand curves cannot be used interchangeably. Reference: Sections 604.1 and E101.1.1, IPC 2006.
2. Sizing of the branch piping shall be in accordance with Table 604.3, IPC 2006. The maximum flow rate for the PEX shall also be in accordance with the allowable friction loss calculated on sheet P2.1, and the PEX manufacturer's published friction data. Reference: Sections 604.1 and 604.3, IPC 2006.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
07/09/2010 DELMA ROBEY OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
07/09/2010 SUE REEVES REJECT SHELF Completed