Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - T10CM00463
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/26/2010 | DAVE MANN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/26/2010 | RBROWN1 | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | Not a COT owned/operated property |
| 02/26/2010 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Please show accessible routes through out site to all accessible entrances and exits. 2. Please show spot grades throught out the accessible route showing compliance with 2006 IBC, ICC (ANSI) 117.1, Section 403.3. 3. Both groups of accessible parking must have a marked crossing compliant with ICC (ANSI) 117.1, Sections 106, 406.12 and 406.13. Please provide a large scale detail of both crossings showing all critical accessible requirements for code compliance. 4. Please provide a large scale detail of the exact parking design as shown on the site plan showing all critical accessible requirements per code compliance. Generic details such as 4/A1.1 are not acceptable. 5. Please show ramp (4A1.1) at area indicated at the entrance to the Patio from the parking. There does not appear to be enough room for this ramp and required landing space at the top of the ramp as required by section 406.7. Please redesign and provide a marked crossing to the accessible parking. 6. Please provide a large scale detail of the accessible parking sign including a "Van Accessible" sign. 7. Please provide concrete wheel bumpers for all accessible parking spaces to protect the sign from being knocked over. 8. Please detail all stairs, treads, risers and railing systems. 9. At all stairs please insure vertical clearance compliance as per Section 307.4. END OF REVIEW |
| 03/01/2010 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: ANcongress T10CM00463 Site Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 3, 2010 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. This site plan was reviewed for compliance with the City of Tucson Development Standards (D.S.) and Land Use Code (LUC). This project has been reviewed for full code compliance for the areas of expansion and modification to the existing parking and loading area. 2. Per LUC Section 2.8.10.4.B a Major Project Design Review is required for this project. 3. Per LUC Section 2.8.10.8 a Modification of Development Regulations (MDR) is required for reduction in the number of vehicle parking spaces and loading spaces shown on the last approved site plan. 4. Based on the provided last approved site plan and changes to the vehicle use area the following comments apply. 5. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.8 Per D.S. 3-05.2.3.C.1 A vehicular use area must be provided with post barricades or wheel stop curbing designed to prevent parked vehicles from extending beyond the property lines; damaging adjacent landscaping, walls, or building. That said vehicle parking spaces 25 - 36 and 56 - 62 will require wheel stops to prevent damage to the adjacent building. Show the wheel stop location on the parking space detail and dimension per D.S. 3-05.2.3.C.2 and Figure 5. 6. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.9 The proposed bicycle parking detail does not meet the requirements of D.S. 2-09. Please review the revised development standard and provide a detail that addresses the following: materials for lighting, paving, and security; fully dimensioned layout; location; specific type of rack and the number of bicycles 7. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.11 Per LUC 3.3.7.2.C.4 The minimum width of a two-way parking area access lane (PAAL) is twenty-four (24) feet wide. That said the two southern entrance PAALs do not meet this requirement. 8. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 Per LUC Table 3.3.7.I the minimum width of a PAAL that provides access to 90 degree parking is twenty-four (24) feet wide. This said the northern most PAAL does not meet this requirement. 9. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 Per D.S. 3-05.2.2.D A back-up spur will be provided at the end of a row of parking if no ingress or egress is provided at that end. That said provide a backup spur that meets the requirements of D.S. 3-05.2.2.D and Figure 2 at the end of two (2) southern PAALs. 10. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 Per D.S. 3-05.2.2.B.1 A minimum setback distance of five (5) feet for a pedestrian refuge area must be maintained between any enclosed structure and a PAAL. That said provide a five foot pedestrian refuge for the area between the PAAL and building located south of the proposed addition. 11. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 Per D.S. 2-08.4.1.B A sidewalk will be provided adjacent and parallel to any PAAL on the side where buildings are located. That said provide a sidewalk for the area between the PAAL and building located south of the proposed addition. 12. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.4 The proposed addition, patio and roof deck are required to meet the parking requirements of LUC Section 3.3.6.1.B. That said the total square footage of 5,571 / 300 requires an additional 19 vehicle parking spaces for the proposed expansion. Revise the vehicle parking calculation to show the required and provided number of vehicle parking spaces. The last approved plan provided 76 vehicle parking spaces, the proposed plan shows 62 vehicle parking spaces equaling a reduction 14 vehicle parking spaces. With 19 vehicle parking spaces required for the expansion and 14 vehicle parking spaces deleted from the last approved plan, for a total of 33 vehicle parking spaces, a variance may be required. 13. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.4 Provide a bicycle parking calculation that shows the required and provided number of bicycle parking spaces. 14. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.5 The last approved site plan shows two (2) 12 x 35 loading spaces on site, the proposed plan has removed both loading spaces. Provide the two loading spaces on the plan. 15. Depending on how the above comments are addressed addition comments may be forth coming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956. C:\planning\site\t10cm00463 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and additional requested documents. |
| 03/03/2010 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | Use of the Public Right-of-Way: Non-required landscaping may be placed in the public right-of-way, if the following requirements are met LUC 3.7.2.9 A. The landscaping is approved by the City Engineer or designee and complies with the City Engineer's requirements on construction, irrigation, location, and plant type. (Ord. No. 9392, §1, 5/22/00) Obtain permission for use of the ROW. B. All vegetation complies with the requirements of Sec. 3.7.2.2. Identify plant material. C. The landscaping does not interfere with the use of the sidewalk. |
| 03/05/2010 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/08/2010 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Miguel Fuentevilla DATE: March 8, 2010 2810 E. 4th Street Tucson, Arizona 85716 Subject: NAcongress, 478 E. Congress Street Site plan T10CM00463 (First Review) T14S, R13E, Section 12 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Site Plan and Drainage Statement. The Site Plan (SP) and Drainage Statement (DS) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Site Plan: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the SP. 2. Please label lot dimensions and bearings per D.S. 2-02.2.1.5. Clarify the property lines on the drawings. It is difficult distinguish the property lines. 3. List the conditions associated with DSMR 05-17 on the plans. 4. All construction shall be within the property lines, with the exception of permitted work in the right-of-way. 5. A 3' back-up spur is required for the south parking lot, spaces 54-62. 6. Provide all existing and proposed buildings and structures, including location, size, height, overhangs, canopies, and use per D.S. 2-02.2.1.6. 7. Label existing and future sight visibility triangles per D.S. 2-02.2.1.10. 8. Show all points of egress and ingress including locations and width of driveways and parking area access lanes (P.A.A.L.) per D.S. 2-02.2.1.11. A min. 24' wide P.A.A.L. is required for two-way access lane. 9. Please label all vehicular, bicycle, pedestrian, and handicapped circulation clearly identified per D.S. 2-02.2.1.12. 10. Fully dimensioned loading space(s) and maneuvering area(s) per D.S. 2-02.2.1.14. 11. Please provide Drainage patterns and finished grades per D.S. 2-02.2.1.16. Show at a min. the drainage patterns for the new pavement area. 12. Please show dimensioned right-of-way, including any applicable Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan right-of-way per D.S. 2-02.2.1.19. 13. Dimension from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways, and utility lines per D.S. 2-02.2.1.21. 14. Show Site plan number (T10CM00463) on all sheets per D.S. 2-02.2.1.29. 15. Show refuse container location, size, and access thereto fully dimensioned per D.S. 2-02.2.1.32 and D.S. 6-01.0. 16. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. 17. Please show a typical cross section of the P.A.A.L. or call out the percentage of slopes. Call out the GB at the D/W, if applicable. 18. Please show the proposed roof drainage patterns, 100% of the 10-year flow must be conveyed under the sidewalks including any other site drainage as well. Please provide supporting calculations to demonstrate compliance with D.S. 3-01.4.4. If the location(s) of the roof scuppers and/or sidewalk scuppers have not yet been decided, a general note indicating sidewalk scuppers will be used when the roof drain/sidewalk scupper locations have been designed and located and that the 10-year flow must be conveyed under any other sidewalks and/or pedestrian paths will suffice. 19. List the consulting engineer and the owner/developer on the plans with the pertinent information if applicable. 20. Add note: "Depress all landscaped areas 6" maximum for water harvesting". 21. Wheelchair ramps are required. All wheel chair ramps shall have the truncated domes instead of the standard grooves that are shown on COT SD 207. Aside from the Truncated Domes, all wheel chair ramps shall be constructed in accordance with COT SD 207. Drainage Statement: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DS. 2. A Drainage Statement is a brief description of drainage conditions applicable for a site which are not affected by 100 year flows of 100 cfs, of more……per S.M.D.D.F.M., chap. II, 2.1.2. The DS must be submitted along with the site plan and accepted with the approval of the grading plan. 3. The content and format of the Drainage Statement should follow S.M.D.D.F.M., chap. II, 2.2. 4. Show the project address or administration address on the cover sheet of the DS. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4932 or Paul.Machado@tucsonaz.gov Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 837-4932 office (520) 879-8010 fax C:/278 E Congress St._Site |
| 03/19/2010 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. The rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole (2393.00) is less than 12" below the first floor elevation (2393.5). Note the requirement for a backwater valve per Section 710.1, UPC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson. 2. Revise the site drawing to include the following information: a. the location and size of the water meter b. the location of the main water lines and fire hydrants c. the location of the gas meter (if any) d. the location and size of the public sanitary sewer e. the point of connection to the of the building sewer to the public sewer Reference: City of Tucson Development Standard No. 2-01.1.0 2 3.8 D and Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 07/07/2010 | SUE REEVES | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 07/07/2010 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |