Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T10CM00272
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
03/11/2010 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | Fire Comments: Fire Comments: Only the calculations and shop drawings can be deferred. Please include the following fire sprinkler design criteria to the plans. 1. Flow data (static pressure, residual pressure, GPM) Available from the Fire Department (520) 791-3234 2. The standard to be used in development of sprinkler system. (NFPA 13, NFPA 13R, or NFPA 13D) 3. The hazard classification of the building, including any special hazards. 4. The density required of the water supply. |
03/17/2010 | RICK MYERS | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Item not addressed. Provide a site utility plan showing sewer, water, and grease interceptor piping and connections. Include upstream and downstream manhole inverts and rim elevations and locations... 2. See sheet P6.0 detail two. Patio Heater Gas Manifold. Reference: Figure 12-11 2006 Illustrated Training Manual for the 2006 UPC. Providing a screened hole six inches above grade, and turned toward the building does not protect against water entering chase. Vent chase termination similarly to figure 12-11 2006 ITM. 3. Identify all three compartments of the three compartment sink. i.e. wash bowl, rinse bowl, sanitizing bowl, etc. If a sanitizing bowl is required, it shall be indirectly connected. See note number two from previous comments. |
03/18/2010 | LAITH ALSHAMI | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Laith Alshami, Engineering and Floodplain Review, 03/18/2010, The project can not be approved until the Site Plan is approved. |
03/24/2010 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | 03/19/2010 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section Terry Stevens Lead Planner Comments: 1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning could not verify that the building plan was in compliance with the approved site plan. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped site, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next building plan submittal. 3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. |