Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL-BLDG/FIRE/ZONING/ENG
Permit Number - T10CM00272
Review Name: COMMERCIAL-BLDG/FIRE/ZONING/ENG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/04/2010 | DAVE MANN | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | Fire Comments: Please include the following fire sprinkler design criteria to the plans. 1. Flow data (static pressure, residual pressure, GPM) Available from the Fire Department (520) 791-3234 2. The standard to be used in development of sprinkler system. (NFPA 13, NFPA 13R, or NFPA 13D) 3. The hazard classification of the building, including any special hazards. 4. The density required of the water supply. |
| 02/05/2010 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. SHEET S0.1; FOUNDATION NOTES: NOTE 1 INDICATES A SOIL INVESTIGATION REPORT WAS USED IN THE DESIGN. PROVIDE THE REPORT FOR REVIEW. 2. SHEETS S2.0 AND S2.1 (FOOTING AND COLUMN SCHEDULES); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS: THERE ARE FOOTINGS AND COLUMNS LISTED IN THE PLAN SCHEDULES THAT COULD NOT BE LOCATED IN THE CALCULATIONS. PROVIDE A REFERENCE PLAN IN THE CALCULATIONS THAT INDICATES ALL OF THE BEAM, COLUMN, AND FOOTING DESIGNS AND LOCATIONS. 3. SHEET S2.0 (FOUNDATION PLAN); SHEET S4.0 (DETAIL S4.0-13): REVERSE THE DIRECTION OF THE SECTION CUT (AT THE RAMP/FREEZER AREA) TO MATCH THE DETAIL. 4. SHEET S2.0 (FOUNDATION PLAN); SHEET S4.0 (DETAIL S4.0-11): REVERSE THE DIRECTION OF THE SECTION CUT (AT THE LEFT SIDE OF THE ENTRY) TO MATCH THE DETAIL. 5. SHEET S2.0 (FOUNDATION PLAN); SHEET S4.0 (DETAIL S4.0-01): REVERSE THE DIRECTION OF THE SECTION CUT (AT GRID B NEAR GRID 3) TO MATCH THE DETAIL. 6. SHEET S4.0; DETAIL S4.0-07: REMOVE THE T.O.F NOTE AT THE TOP OF THE SLAB. 7. SHEET S4.0; DETAIL S4.0-09: CHANGE T.O.F TO T.O.S. 8. SHEET S4.0; DETAIL S4.0-20: THE DETAIL INDICATES "SEE PLAN T.O.F." THE T.O.F. WAS NOT LOCATED ON THE PLAN. CLARIFY. 22. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 02/08/2010 | RICK MYERS | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Revise the plumbing drawings to correct the direction of the North arrow and coordinate the utility services with the civil drawings. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. 2. Unless identified in chapter 8 2006 U.P.C. Indirect Waste, all fixtures are to be directly connected to the sanitary sewer. One compartment of the three compartment sink may be indirectly wasted if it is used for vegetable prep, or used as a sanitizing bowl. 3. The grease waste connections at the dishwasher are drawn in backwards. 4. Provide a detail showing how the sleeved gas lines are to be vented. Reference: 1211.1.6 2006 U.P.C. 5. Refer to key note 25 on P4.0, T and P relief drains are to be gravity drain to the outside. 6. Provide a site utility plan showing sewer, water, and grease interceptor piping and connections. Include upstream and downstream manhole inverts and rim elevations and locations, water meter size and location. 7. Clarify the roof drains for the entry canopy on the North side of the building (i.e. area served and overflow method) and indicate where the 4" RDL shown on sheet P7.0 terminates. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. 8. Clarify the termination of the primary rainwater leaders; they may not cross over the sidewalk. Reference: Section 4.4 F, City of Tucson Development Standard No. 3-01.0. 9. Sheet C3 of the civil drawings indicates that the existing natural gas service to the building will be located beneath the slab of the proposed patio seating area. Show how this pipe will be either relocated or protected from damage. Reference: Section 1211.1.6, UPC 2006. |
| 02/16/2010 | LAITH ALSHAMI | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Laith Alshami, Engineering and Floodplain Review, 02/16/2010, The project can not be approved until the Site Plan is approved. |
| 02/24/2010 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | 02/24/2010 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section Terry Stevens Lead Planner Comments: 1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning could not verify that the building plan was in compliance with the approved site plan. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped site, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next building plan submittal. 3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 03/10/2010 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 03/10/2010 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |