Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL TI
Permit Number - T10CM00253
Review Name: COMMERCIAL TI
Review Status: Completed
Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
02/03/2010 | RONALD BROWN | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | Non accessible employee work area, wash bay addition |
02/04/2010 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Approved | |
02/04/2010 | DAVE MANN | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | Fire Comments: Please include the following fire sprinkler design criteria to the plans. 1. The hazard classification of the building, including any special hazards. The hazard class may have changed in this area. 2. The density required of the water supply. |
02/09/2010 | RONALD BROWN | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. The minimum font height is 3/32" for both upper and lower case lettering. There are several sheets throughout your submittal package that do exceed this minimum. Please revise all these sheets and resubmit. 2. There is an additional fee for diferred submittals. Please submit a written summary of the deferred submittal items and send it to Mr. LeeRay Hanly. 3. Please submit special inspection certifications for the required special inspections summarized on sheet S0.1. These blank certificates may be found on our web site: http://www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd/Forms_Fees___Maps/Applications/Special_Inspection.pdf END OF REVIEW |
02/11/2010 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | For comments see T10CM00252, RT Majuta, Elect Plan Review,2/16/10 |
02/16/2010 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Denied | Provide the demand for the new equipment for building #7 and use the total demand for the building to determine the size of the water meter if it is separately metered. Reference: Reference: Section 610.1, UPC 2006. |
02/16/2010 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Provide plumbing plans for the new work, including water isometrics and waste and vent isometrics. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. |
02/17/2010 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Clarify the extent of the mechanical work for Building #7. The architectural (A2.7.1) indicates one existing and one new evaporative cooler but only the existing evaporative cooler is shown on sheet M2.7.1. 2. Show the balancing information for the existing evaporative cooler, i.e. how much air will be supplied to the electrical room and how much to the storage room. 3. Coordinate the column designations for Building #7 with the electrical and architectural drawings. |
02/19/2010 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Sun Tran Expansion T10CM00251, T10CM00252, T10CM00253 Building Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 19, 2010 1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning has reviewed the building plans and it appears they match the development package. Until the development package has been approved Zoning cannot approve the building plans. 3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved and stamped Development Package. Additional comments may be forthcoming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: |
03/01/2010 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
---|---|---|---|
03/11/2010 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
03/11/2010 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |