Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T10CM00252
Parcel: 106101650

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL NEW

Permit Number - T10CM00252
Review Name: COMMERCIAL NEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
02/03/2010 RONALD BROWN ADA REVIEW Denied SHEET G1.00
1. Being a City of Tucson owned and operated project, the accessibility code compliance is the 1994 Edition of ADAAG. Please add this code reference to the "Codes In Effect" legend.
2. Please change section 4.0, note 2 reference to ICC A117.1 to read 1994 Edition ADAAG.
SHEET A4.5.1
3. All toilet accessibile designs appear to have been based upon ICC (ANSI) 117.1. As clarified in comment 1 above, this project must follow ADAAG requirements. Please redesign all toilet floor plans and elevations to meet ADAAG, remove the vertical grab bar and change all dimensions accordingly.
SHEET GS2.5.1W
4. All accessible signage must be as per ADAAG, Section 4.3. Mounting height is required to be 5' to center line of sign and mounted to the wall on the strike side of the door, not on the door.

END OF REVIEW
02/04/2010 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Denied Clarify the demand due to the chassis wash (Sheet P0.01 and Specification 11145) and use the total demand to determine the size of the water meter. Reference: Reference: Section 610.1, UPC 2006.
02/04/2010 DAVE MANN FIRE REVIEW Denied See comments on T10CM00253 which is part of this set.

The fuel tanks require a separate permit and dimentioned site plan.
02/04/2010 GERRY KOZIOL WWM REVIEW Approved
02/05/2010 RONALD BROWN BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied SUN TRAN FACILITY (MAINTENANCE)
T10CM00252

SHEET G.10.1.5
1. Please provide further explaination of the noted paragraph entitled " HAZARDOUS (CLASSIFIED) REQUIREMENTS". If there are in fact hazardous materials store in this facility, please provide a code analysis of such material and provide an "H" occupancy classification and fire protection as required by the 2006 IBC.
2. As per DSD drawing development standards, the minimum size of lettering fonts is 3/32" upper and lower case. Through out several pages of these document there is lettering smaller than 3/32. Please revise all effected drawigs and resubmit.
3. There is an additional fee for diferred submittals. Please submit a written summary of the deferred submittal items and send it to Mr. LeeRay Hanly.
4. Please submit special inspection certifications for the required special inspections summarized on sheet S0.1. These blank certificates may be found on our web site: http://www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd/Forms_Fees___Maps/Applications/Special_Inspection.pdf

STRUCTURAL REVIEW COMMENTS
ERIC NEWCOMB

5. SHEET S2.5.1W; STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS PAGE 37: THE COLUMNS AND FOOTINGS ALONG GRID LINES 6 AND 8 BETWEEN GRIDS W AND EE ARE TYPICALLY NOT INDICATED IN THE CALCULATIONS. IF THEY ARE TYPICAL WITH ANOTHER COLUMN AND FOOTING IN THE CALCULATIONS, INDICATE.
6. SHEETS S2.5.1W AND S2.5.1E; FOUNDATION PLANS: THERE ARE LIMITED INDICATIONS OF THE TOP OF FOOTING ELEVATIONS ON THE FOUNDATION PLANS. ARE WE USING THE NOTE 1 AT THE BOTTOM OF THESE TWO SHEETS TO SET THE TOP OF FOOTING ELEVATIONS? ARE WE DEPENDING ON THE CONTRACTOR TO SLOPE OR STEP THE FOOTINGS AS THE GRADE VARIES? CLARIFY.
7. SHEET S2.5.1W; KEYNOTE 5: THE NOTE INDICATOR ON THE PLAN INDICATES THE 2-#4 BARS ARE TYPICAL. DOES THIS MEAN TYPICAL WHERE SHOWN ON THE PLAN, OR TYPICAL AT ALL COLUMNS? CLARIFY.
8. GENERAL: ALL DEFERRED SUBMITTALS MUST BE APPROVED BY LEERAY HANLY BEFORE PERMITS WILL BE ISSUED.
9. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS.

END OF REVIEW
02/08/2010 RAY MAJUTA ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied Project: T10CM00252, Bus Storage and Maint-Bldg,
4000 N Sun Tran Blvd.
The electrical plans for this project have been denied for the following, address each item and indicate how each was addressed.
1. Provide 2006 IECC Lighting Budget Calculations and requirements for switching as required per Section 505.
2. Provide Outdoor Light Ordinance Calculations as required per City of Tucson Outdoor Lighting Ord # 10135.
3. Sheet E2.5.3w, the following circuits in Pnl- MTH6A for power do not match the panel schedule, 21-23-25,27-29-31,
33-35-37,39-41-43. Not in phase with each other.
4.Sheet E2.5.3w, Pnl-MTH6B circuit 37 used however spare in panel schedule.
5.Sheet E2.5.3w, shows circuits 23-25-27, no panel label.
6. Sheet E2.5.3w, Pnl-MTL1 cir's 2-4-6, 14-16-18, shown,cannot locate panel or schedule.
7. Sheet E2.5.3w Pnl-MTH cir's 14-16-18, shown, cannot locate panel or schedule.
8. Sheet E2.7.2 shows cir's TWL-13-15-17,25-27-29, cannot locate panel or schedule.
9. Sheet E2.7.2, cir's THW1 1-3-5, cannot locate panel or schedule.
10. Sheet E2.7.2 shows cir's TWL 2 , cannot locate panel or schedule.
11. Sheet E4.2, Pnl-MTH7B cir's 37-39-41,to 75 KVA Trans, has a feeder of 3-250 kmil conductors going into a 90 amp breaker, how will these conductors terminate in a 90 amp CB?
12.Sheet E4.3, Section MTDSA (1200 amps), feeds Transformer TMTL 112.5 KVA with a primary OC of 400 amps.
I believe NEC 2205 450.3(B) requires a 250 % rating of OC device. The primary amperage is approx 135 amps X 250 %= 337.5 amps, requiring a 350 amp OC device, do you agree?
13. Sheet E4.3, feeder from 400a switch to MTATS-LS has a #6 grd, 250.122 requires a #3 grd for overcurrent device.
14. Sheet E4.3, feeder from 400a switch to MTATS-OS has a
#6 grd, 250.122 requires a #3 grd for overcurrent device.
15.Sheet E4.3, size the grd shown for the 600 amp generator.
16.Sheet E4.3 shows the following Panels MTH6A,MTH8A, MTHM, all with parallel feeds for 4 3/0's and #6 grds, coming from a 400a overcurrent device. The grds to be sized to #3 per NEC 250.122.
17. Sheet E4.3 , the feeders to MTATS-LS should have a #3 grd, and the feeder to MTATS-OS a #4 grd.
18. Sheet E5.4,Panels MTOSH and MTLSH, schedules shown on this sheet, not shown in electrical room.
19. Sheet E5.2, SB MTDSB should be named MTDSA , and the location in schedule is room 173 not 178 ?
20. Sheet E5.3, Panels MTH7A MTH7B,MTL7A,MTL7B also need to be labeled on sheet E2.5.4.
21. Sheet E5.2 , Panel MTH3e, have not been able to locate any circuits listed in this panel, are they existing?
22. Same as # 21 above for Panel MTH3r.
23. Sheet E5.2 Panel MTH6A, cannot locate cir's 19-21-23,
20-22-24,25-27-29, 37-39-41.
24. Sheet E5.3, Panel MTH7A, cannot locate cir's 13-15-17, 19-21-23.
25. Sheet E5.3, Panel MTL6A, cannot locate cir's 25-27,
31-33-35.


Ray T Majuta
Elect Pln Review,
PSDS, City of Tucson,
2/08/10
Ray.Majuta@tucsonaz.gov
02/09/2010 SUE REEVES COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING Passed
02/19/2010 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Denied DSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: Sun Tran Expansion
T10CM00251, T10CM00252, T10CM00253
Building Plan (1st Review)

TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 19, 2010

1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed.

2. Zoning has reviewed the building plans and it appears they match the development package. Until the development package has been approved Zoning cannot approve the building plans.

3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved and stamped Development Package. Additional comments may be forthcoming.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED:
02/26/2010 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Revise the font size used on the drawings to a minimum of 3/32-inch (all upper case). Reference: Section 106.1.1, IBC 2006.
2. Provide energy code compliance calculations using the correct climate zone for Pima County < 4,000 feet. Provide sufficient detail on the drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the building envelope. The information shall, as a minimum, include U-factors of the envelope systems and fenestration components, along with the R-values of the insulation and the SHGC for the fenestration. Reference: Sections 101.4 and 104.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2006.
3. Clarify location of the exhaust termination for the hose reel exhaust fans with regard to the building openings and air intake openings. Reference: Sections 401.4.1 and 501.2, IMC 2006.
4. Provide a copy of the design calculations used to determine the exhaust rate for the CNG purge system. Reference: Section 502.16.1, IMC 2006.
5. Identify the location of the air inlets for the CNG purge system. Clarify how the location of the exhaust outlets complies with the requirements of Section 502.16.1, IMC 2006 to be located at the high point of the room and to achieve uniform air movement during purging operation. This applies to both the Phase II portion of the building and the Phase III section of the building. Reference: Section 106.3.1, IMC 2006.
6. Clarify the location depicted on sheet PP1.6.2. Modifications to other buildings will require separate activity numbers. Reference: Section 106.3.1, IMC 2006.
02/26/2010 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Coordinate the numbering of the plumbing sheets (e.g. sheet P1.5.1 EXW refers to a continuation on sheet P1.5.01EW which doesn't appear in the drawing set and the continuation is actually shown on P1.5.1 EXE). Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006.
2. Complete the natural gas piping design, showing the developed lengths of the piping for both the medium pressure and the low pressure segments. Coordinate the piping plan with the schematic drawing and show the locations of all the pressure regulators. Reference: Sections 103.2.3 and 1217.0, UPC 2006.
3. Clarify the natural gas loads to design the system: the equipment loads shown on the drawings are different from the loads shown in the specifications and the intermediate loads shown on the piping drawings don't appear to correlate with either.
4. The natural gas schedule shown on sheet P0.01 indicates the total load for the building but sheet P1.5.1 EXW shows the new 2-1/2" NG line connecting to an existing 4" NG line. Where is the gas meter located, what is the new total load on the meter, and what developed length was used to size the 4" NG line? Reference: Sections 1202.0 and 1209.4, UPC 2006.
5. Revise the water pressure calculations to include the minimum residual water pressure. Note that the specified tankless water heater requires a minimum residual pressure of 25 PSI and the specified emergency shower requires a minimum pressure of 30 PSI to operate properly. Reference: Sections 608.1 and 610.1, UPC 2006.
6. Revise the water pressure calculations to include the demand from HVAC equipment and shop equipment. Reference: Section 610.1, UPC 2006.
7. The branch piping sizes called out for the flush valves (P-1 and P-2) will result in water velocities greater than 8 FPS. Limit the water velocity to less than 8 FPS for the copper piping. Reference: Sections 610.1 and A 6.1, UPC 2006 and IS 3-2003, Section 2.6.
8. Provide cleanouts for the upper terminals of the building drain and its horizontal branches that exceed 5'-0" in length or serve sinks. Reference: Section 707.4, UPC 2006.
9. Provide a description of CP-1 and show how it complies with the requirements of Section 805.0, UPC 2006.
10. Clarify the intent of the waste piping labeled "W.P." as shown on sheets P1.5.1W, P1.5.1E, P5.01, and CU101. Coordinate the design and, if it is conveying oily or flammable wastes, provide a design for an appropriate interceptor.
11. The 3" W.P. OIL piping shown on sheet P5.01 indicates the presence of floor cleanouts. Show the location of these cleanouts on sheets P1.5.1W and P1.5.1E. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006.
12. Provide roof drainage calculations and plans. Provide overflow protection for the roof. Reference: Sections 1101.11 and 1106.0, UPC 2006.
13. Provide sizing information for the roof scuppers, the overflow openings for the conductor heads, and the downspouts for those that must be increased from the 4"x 4" size noted on sheet A8.5.1. Reference: Section 1101.11, UPC 2006.
14. Provide a cleanout at the base of each roof drain leader prior to its connection with the horizontal storm drain. Reference: Section 1101.12.2, UPC 2006.
15. Revise the termination of the primary rainwater leader so that they don't cross over any sidewalks. Reference: Section 4.4 F, City of Tucson Development Standard No. 3-01.0.
16. Include the column labels on the roof plans. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006.
03/01/2010 LOREN MAKUS ENGINEERING REVIEW Approved

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
03/11/2010 CPIERCE1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
03/11/2010 SUE REEVES REJECT SHELF Completed