Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T10CM00251
Parcel: 106101650

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL NEW

Permit Number - T10CM00251
Review Name: COMMERCIAL NEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
02/03/2010 RONALD BROWN ADA REVIEW Denied SHEET G1.00
1. Being a City of Tucson owned and operated project, the accessibility code compliance is the 1994 Edition of ADAAG. Please add this code reference to the "Codes In Effect" legend.
2. The Building Code Summary needs clarification:
a. Section 3.1 calls for a total occupant load of 544. Section 4.0 states a total load of 271. Please change 4.0 to read 272 males and 272 females.
b. Please change section 4.0, note 2 reference to ICC A117.1 to read 1994 Edition ADAAG.
c. Please recalculate the number of plumbing fixtures based upon Table 2902.1, Note 1; which states "or any fraction of the number of persons indicated"; i.e. 6.4 = 7 fictures.
d. The number of toilets show I believe, needs to be have M and F reversed.
SHEET A2.1.1
3. The entrance matts can be no higher than 1/4" without ramp modification as per ADAAG 4.5.2 and Figure 7. Please clearify.
SHEET A4.1.1
4. All toilet accessibile designs appear to have been based upon ICC (ANSI) 117.1. As clarified in comment 1 above, this project must follow ADAAG requirements. Please redesign all toilet floor plans and elevations to meet ADAAG.remove the vertical grab bar and change all dimensions accordingly.
SHEET GS2.1.1
4. All accessible signage must be as per ADAAG, Section 4.3. Mounting height is required to be 5' to center line of sign and mounted to the wall on the strike side of the door, not on the door.

END OF REVIEW
02/04/2010 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Approved
02/04/2010 DAVE MANN FIRE REVIEW Denied Fire Comments:

Please include the following fire sprinkler design criteria to the plans.
1. Flow data (static pressure, residual pressure, GPM)
Available from the Fire Department (520) 791-3234
2. The standard to be used in development of sprinkler system. (NFPA 13, NFPA 13R, or NFPA 13D)
3. The hazard classification of the building, including any special hazards. Is this really Ord. 1 ?.
4. The density required of the water supply.
02/04/2010 GERRY KOZIOL WWM REVIEW Approved
02/05/2010 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Provide a description for the plumbing fixture called out as P-11 on sheets P1.1.1, P1.1.2, and P2.01. Reference: Sections 103.2.3 and 401.1, UPC 2006.
2. Coordinate the plumbing fixtures called out on the riser diagram and waste diagram with the plumbing floor plans. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006.
3. Coordinate the types of water heaters shown on the plumbing floor plans and the riser diagram. The plumbing plans call for two WH-2 units located in the Janitor's rooms and a WH-3 unit located at sink S-2 on the first floor. The riser diagram calls for two WH-1 units in the janitor's rooms and a WH-2 unit at sink S-2. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006.
4. Water-free urinals are not Code-compliant fixtures per the 2006 UPC. Submit an appeal to the Building Official requesting approval to utilize a water-free urinal based on the International Plumbing Code. Reference: Sections 211.0 (insanitary), 301.2, 405.2, 409.0, 601.1, and 1005.0, UPC 2006.
5. Show how the mounting shelf for the water heater is attached to the building structure. Reference: Sections 310.0 and 314.5, UPC 2006.
6. Revise the detail of the storage-type water heater installation to include the expansion tank and vacuum relief valve. Reference: Sections 103.2.3, 608.3, and 608.7 UPC 2006.
7. Provide upper terminal cleanouts on horizontal drainage pipes exceeding 5 feet in length (horizontal drain lines serving sinks and urinals require cleanouts regardless of length). Reference: Section 707.4, UPC 2006.
8. Clarify how the reclaimed water service will comply with the requirements of Part II, Chapter 16, UPC 2006 for installation, identification, signage, and testing.
02/09/2010 SUE REEVES COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING Passed
02/16/2010 RAY MAJUTA ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied Project: T10CM00251
3910 N Sun Tran Blvd
City of Tucson, New Administration Bldg,
Bus Storage and Maintenance Bldg

The Electrical Plans for this project have been denied for the following:

1. Provide 2006 IECC Lighting Budget Calculations.
2. Provide 2006 City of Tucson Outdoor Lighting Code Ord # 10135.
3. Sheet E2.1.3, circuit 7 on this sheet is not identified to a panel.
4. Sheet E3.2, the following circuits do not match the panel schedule on sheetE5.3, circuits 11,12, and 13.
5. Sheet E4.2 note # 8, cannot locate Elevator Panel on Power plans.
6. Sheet E5.3 , what do the letter and number designations after Panel CP-SES stand for ? Different sections ?
7. Sheet E5.3, fill out the total KVA and total amp loads on panels.


Ray T Majuta, City of Tucson, DSPD,
Elect Plan Review
2/15/10
Ray.Majuta@tucsonaz.gov
02/19/2010 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Denied DSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: Sun Tran Expansion
T10CM00251, T10CM00252, T10CM00253
Building Plan (1st Review)

TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 19, 2010

1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed.

2. Zoning has reviewed the building plans and it appears they match the development package. Until the development package has been approved Zoning cannot approve the building plans.

3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved and stamped Development Package. Additional comments may be forthcoming.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED:
02/22/2010 RONALD BROWN BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. The minimum font height is 3/32" for both upper and lower case lettering. There are several sheets throughout your submittal package that do exceed this minimum. Please revise all these sheets and resubmit.
2. There is an additional fee for deferred submittals. Please submit a written summary of the deferred submittal items and send it to Mr. LeeRay Hanly.
3. Please submit special inspection certifications for the required special inspections summarized on sheet S0.1. These blank certificates may be found on our web site: http://www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd/Forms_Fees___Maps/Applications/Special_Inspection.pdf

STRUCTURAL REVIEW
ERIC A NEWCOMB

4. SHEET S2.1.1; KEYNOTE 5: THE NOTE INDICATOR ON THE PLAN INDICATES THE 2-#4 BARS ARE TYPICAL. DOES THIS MEAN TYPICAL WHERE SHOWN ON THE PLAN, OR TYPICAL AT ALL COLUMNS? CLARIFY.
5. SHEET S2.1.1; FOUNDATION PLAN: AT THE COLUMN LOCATED IN THE GRID F AND GRID 2 AREAS, THE PLAN INDICATES 2-C6. CLARIFY.
6. SHEET S2.1.1 (FOOTING SCHEDULE); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (PAGE 128): THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE THE FOOTING REINFORCEMENT OF 3-#4 EACH WAY, WHILE THE SCHEDULE INDICATES 5-#4 EACH WAY (SAME AS F5 FOOTING). CLARIFY.
7. SHEET S2.1.1 (FOOTING SCHEDULE); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (PAGE 146): THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE THE FOOTING REINFORCEMENT OF 6-#5 EACH WAY, WHILE THE SCHEDULE INDICATES 5-#5 EACH WAY. CLARIFY.
8. SHEET S2.1.1 (FOOTING SCHEDULE); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (PAGE 148): THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE THE FOOTING REINFORCEMENT OF 6-#5 EACH WAY, WHILE THE SCHEDULE INDICATES 5-#5 EACH WAY. CLARIFY.
9. SHEET S2.1.3; STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (PAGE 24): THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE THIS IS A HIGH ROOF WINDOW WALL SUPPORT BEAM. PLEASE INDICATE WHERE THIS BEAM IS LOCATED AND INDICATE IN THE CALCULATIONS (ROOF FRAMING NOTE 13 ON SHEET S2.1.2 ?).
10. SHEET S2.1.3; SHEET S3.1 (DETAIL 10): THE DETAIL AT GRIDS F AND 0.2 INDICATES A FOUNDATION TIE DETAIL. REVISE.
11. SHEET S3.1; UTILITY TUNNEL: PLEASE PROVIDE STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS FOR THE UTILITY TUNNEL SLAB.
12. SHEET S3.1; DETAIL 3: INDICATE THE CONCRETE SLAB ON BOTH SIDES OF THE WALL.
13. SHEET S3.2; HSS COLUMN FOOTING DETAIL: THIS DETAIL SHOULD BE NUMBERED 6. REVISE.
14. GENERAL: ALL DEFERRED SUBMITTALS MUST BE APPROVED BY LEERAY HANLY BEFORE PERMITS WILL BE ISSUED.
15. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS.
END OF REVIEW
03/01/2010 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Revise the font size used on the drawings to a minimum of 3/32-inch (all upper case). Reference: Section 106.1.1, IBC 2006.
2. Provide energy code compliance calculations using the correct climate zone for Pima County < 4,000 feet. Provide sufficient detail on the drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the building envelope. The information shall, as a minimum, include U-factors of the envelope systems and fenestration components, along with the R-values of the insulation and the SHGC for the fenestration. Reference: Sections 101.4 and 104.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2006.
3. Clarify the note on details 2 and 4 on sheet M2.1.4, "LOCATE AAV ON SUPPLY/RETURN PIPE TO DRAIN". Reference: Section 106.3.1, IMC 2006.
4. Revise the size of the condensate drains for AH 1-1 and AH 1-2 in accordance with Section 307.2.1, IMC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson.
5. Section 403.3, IMC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson allows the use of the ASHRAE 62-1-2004 ventilation calculation procedure provided that the default occupant densities and combined outdoor air rates are used.
6. Terminal unit 1TU29 is shown supplying the elevator equipment room through a 1-hour fire damper. Why is the return not equipped with a fire damper? Reference: Section 3006.4, IBC 2006.
7. Clarify how the temperature is to be controlled in the elevator equipment room. An independent split-system fan coil is providing approximately 1-ton of air conditioning and terminal unit 1TU29 is also supplying 120 - 425 CFM of air conditioning. Only one thermostat is shown in the room and the terminal unit is equipped with a 1 KW reheat coil. Reference: Section 106.3.1, IMC 2006 and Sections 503.2.2 and 503.2.4, IECC 2006.
8. The proposed modifications to building #3 will require a separate activity number.
03/01/2010 LOREN MAKUS ENGINEERING REVIEW Approved

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
03/11/2010 CPIERCE1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
03/11/2010 SUE REEVES REJECT SHELF Completed