Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL TI
Permit Number - T10CM00225
Review Name: COMMERCIAL TI
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/01/2010 | DAVE MANN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/03/2010 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. SHEET C-1; APPLICABLE CODES: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES USE OF THE ICC/ANSI A117.1-2003 EDITION. REVISE. 2. SHEET C-1; INDEX OF DRAWINGS: CHANGE DP DESIGNATION FOR EXISTING DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO C.2. 3. SHEET C-1; CODE REVIEW: PER THE CITY OF TUCSON COMMERCIAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS, A CODE REVIEW CHECKLIST SHALL BE COMPLETED AND SIGNED BY THE REGISTERED DESIGN PROFESSIONAL OF RECORD (FORM IS AVAILABLE ONLINE). INCLUDE THIS DATA ON SHEET C-1 OF THE DESIGN DRAWINGS. 4. SHEET A-2; FLOOR PLAN: THE SECTION DESIGNATIONS (A/A-3 AND B/A-3) NEED TO BE SHOWN ON THE PLAN. 5. SHEET A-2; PARTITION DETAIL: INDICATE THE GAGE OF THE METAL WALL STUDS. 6. SHEET A-2; PARTITION DETAIL: EXTEND THE DETAIL UP TO INCLUDE THE EXISTING STRUCTURE, NEW BLOCKING, CONNECTION OF THE BLOCKING TO THE EXISTING STRUCTURE, AND THE BLOCKING SIZE AND SPACING. 7. SHEET A-2; FLOOR PLAN: THESE REVISIONS ARE BEING MADE TO THE SECOND FLOOR LEVEL. PROVIDE A BUILDING ONE DIMENSIONED LAYOUT PLAN OF THE SECOND FLOOR (SIMILAR TO SHEET A1.1). 8. SHEET A-2; FLOOR PLAN: THE CORRIDOR CREATED IN THIS PROJECT MUST MEET THE FIRE RESISTANCE RATING REQUIREMENTS OF THE 2006 IBC, TABLE 1017.1. VERIFY THIS ON THE PLANS. 9. SHEET A-2; FLOOR PLAN: PROVIDE A COMPLETE MEANS OF EGRESS INDICATION ON THE PLAN. 10. SHEET A-3; FRAMING PLAN (KEYNOTE 2): SHOW A DETAIL ON THE DRAWINGS INDICATING HOW THE 6" METAL STUDS CONNECT TO THE 3 5/8" METAL TRACK. 11. SHEET A-3; FRAMING PLAN (KEYNOTE 3): PROVIDE THE METAL STUD GAGE AND A DETAIL OF THE BOX BEAM CONNECTION TO THE (2) 6" METAL STUDS. 12. SHEET A-3; FRAMING PLAN (KEYNOTE 4): PROVIDE THE GAGE OF THE METAL STUDS AT THE BOX BEAM. 13. SHEET A-3; FRAMING PLAN (KEYNOTE 4): PROVIDE A DETAIL OF THE BOX BEAM CONNECTION TO THE METAL STUD TRACK AT THE EXISTING CMU WALL. 14. SHEET A-3; FRAMING PLAN (KEYNOTE 4): PROVIDE A DETAIL OF THE CONNECTION OF THE 6" METAL JOISTS TO THE BOTTOM OF THE BOX BEAM. 15. SHEET A-3; FRAMING PLAN (KEYNOTE 5): EXPLAIN HOW THE HANGER WIRES CAN BE LOCATED "EACH WAY". THIS ADDS VERTICAL AND LATERAL LOADS TO THE BOTTOM CHORD OF THE EXISTING TRUSSES. ADDRESS THIS ISSUE. 16. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 02/03/2010 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 02/04/2010 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 02/04/2010 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/04/2010 | ERIC NEWCOMB | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Denied | 1. SEE BUILDING COMMENTS. |
| 02/04/2010 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Revise the mechanical design as required to avoid using the corridor as a return air duct. Reference: Section 601.2, IMC 2006. |
| 02/05/2010 | RICHARD JIROUDEK | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/22/2010 | MICHAEL ST. PAUL | ZONING | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 02/24/2010 | CINDY AGUILAR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 02/24/2010 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |