Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: T10CM00124
Parcel: 12801007A

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL NEW

Permit Number - T10CM00124
Review Name: COMMERCIAL NEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
02/03/2010 MARTIN BROWN FIRE REVIEW Denied Please include the following fire sprinkler design criteria to the plans.
1. Flow data (static pressure, residual pressure, GPM)
Available from the Fire Department (520) 837-7030 or 837-7029
2. The standard to be used in development of sprinkler system. (NFPA 13, NFPA 13R, or NFPA 13D)
3. The hazard classification of the building, including any special hazards.
4. The density required of the water supply.
Also, please clearly indicate locations of panic hardware.
02/03/2010 GERRY KOZIOL WWM REVIEW Denied need ww/iwc- Tom Tomchak review & approval - 443-5025 5025 W Ina Rd
Need 5eth floor wastewater credit review - 740-6602/740-6606
02/05/2010 ERIC NEWCOMB BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. SHEET T1.0; OCCUPANT LOAD: UNDER THE OCCUPANCY LOAD CALCULATION, 261 TOTAL OCCUPANTS ARE INDICATED, WHILE UNDER THE PLUMBING FIXTURE REQUIREMENTS HEADING, 246 OCCUPANTS ARE INDICATED. CLARIFY.
2. SHEET T1.0; BUILDING CODE CRITERIA: THE ACCESSIBILITY CODE SHOULD BE REFERENCED AS THE ICC/ANSI A117.1-2003. REVISE.
3. SHEET A1.0; FLOOR PLAN: IS THE NORTH ARROW CORRECT? VERIFY.
4. SHEET A4.0; ELEVATIONS A4.0-02, 06, AND 13: PER THE ICC/ANSI FIGURE 604.5.1, ADD A VERTICAL GRAB BAR.
5. SHEET A4.0; ACCESSIBLE MOUNTING HEIGHTS: ADD A VERTICAL GRAB BAR AT THE WATER CLOSET PER ICC/ANSI FIGURE 604.5.1.
6. SHEET S0.1; FOUNDATION NOTES: NOTE 1 INDICATES A SOIL INVESTIGATION REPORT WAS USED IN THE DESIGN. PROVIDE THE REPORT FOR REVIEW.
7. SHEETS S2.0 AND S2.1 (FOOTING AND COLUMN SCHEDULES); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS: THERE ARE FOOTINGS AND COLUMNS LISTED IN THE PLAN SCHEDULES THAT COULD NOT BE LOCATED IN THE CALCULATIONS. PROVIDE A REFERENCE PLAN IN THE CALCULATIONS THAT INDICATES ALL OF THE BEAM, COLUMN, AND FOOTING DESIGNS AND LOCATIONS.
8. SHEET S2.0 (FOUNDATION PLAN); SHEET S4.0 (DETAIL S4.0-13): REVERSE THE DIRECTION OF THE SECTION CUT (AT THE RAMP/FREEZER AREA) TO MATCH THE DETAIL.
9. SHEET S2.0 (FOUNDATION PLAN); SHEET S4.0 (DETAIL S4.0-11): REVERSE THE DIRECTION OF THE SECTION CUT (AT THE LEFT SIDE OF THE ENTRY) TO MATCH THE DETAIL.
10. SHEET S2.0 (FOUNDATION PLAN); SHEET S4.0 (DETAIL S4.0-01): REVERSE THE DIRECTION OF THE SECTION CUT (AT GRID B NEAR GRID 3) TO MATCH THE DETAIL.
11. SHEET S3.0 (ROOF FRAMING PLAN); SHEET S5.0 (DETAIL S5.0-03): REVERSE THE DIRECTION OF THE SECTION CUT (ON GRID 3 BELOW GRID C) TO MATCH THE DETAIL.
12. SHEET S3.1 (HIGH ROOF FRAMING PLAN); SHEET S7.0 (DETAIL S7.0-06): THE PLAN INDICATES THE TOP OF THE HSS 12X6X1/4 BEAM IS AT 112'-0", WHILE THE SECTION INDICATES THE TOP OF THE TUBE IS HIGHER. CLARIFY.
13. SHEET S4.0; DETAIL S4.0-07: REMOVE THE T.O.F NOTE AT THE TOP OF THE SLAB.
14. SHEET S4.0; DETAIL S4.0-09: CHANGE T.O.F TO T.O.S.
15. SHEET S4.0; DETAIL S4.0-20: THE DETAIL INDICATES "SEE PLAN T.O.F." THE T.O.F. WAS NOT LOCATED ON THE PLAN. CLARIFY.
16. SHEET S6.0; DETAIL S6.0-01: INDICATE THE BOTTOM CHORD OF THE TRUSS.
17. SHEET S7.0; DETAIL S7.0-06: A 2" DIMENSION IS SHOWN FROM THE TOP OF THE C12. WHAT IS THIS DIMENSION? CLARIFY.
18. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS; SHEET V-13: BEAMS RB-12 AND RB-13 ARE NOT IN THE DESIGN CALCULATIONS. CLARIFY.
19. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS; SHEET V-13: THE DESIGN OF THE HIGH ROOF FRAMING (AS INDICATED ON S3.1-02) WAS NOT LOCATED IN THE CALCULATIONS. CLARIFY.
20. GENERAL: LETTERING ON ALL SHEETS MUST BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT (SHEETS A0.1 AND A0.2) PER CITY OF TUCSON REQUIREMENTS. REVISE.
21. GENERAL: ALL DEFERRED SUBMITTALS MUST BE APPROVED BY LEERAY HANLY BEFORE THEY CAN BE SUBMITTED. PROVIDE.
22. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS.
02/05/2010 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Denied Reduced pressure backflow prevention assemblies are required to be installed directly after the water meter for buildings that have food service facilities (see keynote 16/P1.0). The assemblies are required to be installed in locations accessible to Tucson Water (see keynote 30/P5.0). Show the location of the assembly on the drawings. Reference: COT Ordinance 9976, http://www.tucsonaz.gov/water/docs/backflow-ord.pdf
02/08/2010 ERIC NEWCOMB ZONING HC REVIEW Denied 1. SEE BUILDING COMMENTS.
02/09/2010 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Revise the font size used on the drawings to a minimum of 3/32-inch (all upper case). Reference: Section 106.1.1, IBC 2006.
2. Revise the plumbing drawings to correct the direction of the North arrow and coordinate the utility services with the civil drawings. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006.
3. Coordinate the number of plumbing fixtures shown for the water flow calculation with the plumbing plans. Note that this is an assembly occupancy and revise the water fixture units appropriately. Reference: Section 610.1 and Table A-2, UPC 2006. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006.
4. Clarify the water pressure calculations used to calculate the water pipe sizing; 69 PSI as shown on sheet P3.0 (per 2006 UPC) or 80 PSI on sheet P9.0 (per 2006 IPC). Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. Note that the applicable code for all commercial plumbing projects is the 2006 Uniform Plumbing Code with Local Amendments. Provide an approved appeal to the building official if the plans are to be reviewed to the 2006 IPC.
5. Clarify the BTUH input to WH-1; it is shown as 199 MBH on most drawings but 400 MBH on P10.0. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006.
6. Coordinate the equipment marks for the water heaters, i.e. P5.0 shows WH-1, WH-2 WH-3 and WH-4, Sheet P6.0 shows WH-1 and WH-2, P9.0 shows WH-1, WH-1, WH-2, and WH-3, and sheet P10.0 shows both two WH-1 units and WH-1 and WH-2. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006.
7. Provide a design for the mounting shelf for the booster pump along with structural calculations to show that the pump is safely supported (keynote 30, P5.0). Reference: Sections 310.0 and 314.5, UPC 2006.
8. Provide a design for the mounting shelf for water heater WH-4 along with structural calculations to show that the water heater is safely supported. Reference: Sections 310.0 and 314.5, UPC 2006.
9. The product specified for WH-4 (Insinkerator W152) is not a tankless water heater. Provide a detail of the installation, including the excess pressure relief, expansion tank, and valves. Reference: Sections 103.2.3, 605.5, 608.3, and 608.5 UPC 2006.
10. Clarify the mounting height of the reduced pressure backflow preventers to conform to the access and clearance requirements of Section 603.3.4, UPC 2006 (keynotes 18 and 22, P5.0).
11. Provide a detail of water heater WH-4 installation, including the excess pressure relief, expansion tank, vacuum relief, and valves. Reference: Sections 103.2.3, 605.5, 608.3, and 608.7 UPC 2006.
12. Appliances (e.g. ice makers) to be directly connected to the water supply system that do not have listed, integral backflow preventers or integral air gaps conforming to Table 6-3, UPC 2006 require backflow prevention. Specify the type of backflow prevention device required for each water connection on the drawings. Reference: Sections 602.3, 603.0, and Table 6-2, UPC 2006.
13. Indicate the location of the reduced pressure backflow assembly noted in detail P2.0-06, prior to the carbonator. Reference: Section 603.4.12, UPC 2006.
14. Show the size of the wall cleanouts on the waste and vent isometrics. Reference: Section 103.2.3 and 707.11, UPC 2006.
15. Show the size of the trap arms for the floor drains and the floor sinks on the waste and vent isometrics. Reference: Sections 103.2.3 and 1002.2, UPC 2006.
16. Provide roof drainage areas and sizes for the roof drains and overflow drains on the South and West sides of the building that were not sized on sheet P7.0. Reference: Section 1101.11, UPC 2006.
17. Clarify the roof drains for the entry canopy on the North side of the building (i.e. area served and overflow method) and indicate where the 4" RDL shown on sheet P7.0 terminates. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006.
18. Revise the overflow drain shown in detail D3.0-12 to include a strainer. Reference: Section 1105.2, UPC 2006.
19. Clarify the termination of the primary rainwater leaders; they may not cross over the sidewalk. Reference: Section 4.4 F, City of Tucson Development Standard No. 3-01.0.
20. Sheet C3 of the civil drawings indicates that the existing natural gas service to the building will be located beneath the slab of the proposed patio seating area. Show how this pipe will be either relocated or protected from damage. Reference: Section 1211.1.6, UPC 2006.
21. Clarify how the sleeves for the gas tubing for the patio heaters are to be vented and resist the entrance of water and insects at the manifold end. Reference: Section 1211.1.6, UPC 2006.
02/16/2010 LAITH ALSHAMI ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied Laith Alshami, Engineering and Floodplain Review, 02/16/2010,

The project can not be approved until the Site Plan is approved.
02/18/2010 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Revise the mechanical drawings to correct the direction of the North arrow. Reference: Section 106.3.1, IMC 2006.
2. Revise the energy code analysis, using the correct climate zone (Pima County < 4,000 feet, not Phoenix). Revise the building design as required to meet the code requirements (the submitted calculations indicate that the building "Envelope FAILS by 1 %"). Reference: Section 302.2, IECC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson.
3. Revise the energy code analysis, coordinating the building components used in the analysis with those shown on the drawing. Provide sufficient detail on the drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the building envelope. The information shall, as a minimum, include U-factors of the envelope systems and fenestration components, along with the R-values of the insulation and the SHGC for the fenestration. Reference: Section 502, IECC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson.
4. Provide calculations demonstrating adequate ventilation. Reference: Section 401.2, IMC 2006.
5. Provide information on the sequence of operation for the restroom exhaust fans to show that all of the air supplied to the restrooms will be exhausted. Reference: Section 403.2.1 (3), IMC 2006.
02/19/2010 RAY MAJUTA ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied Project: T10CM00124
TI-Restaurant
5510 E Broadway Bl
The Electrical Plans have been denied for the following, address them individually and indicate response.

1. Mechanical denial requesting exhaust fans to supply air according as to how much removed, in restrooms , if electrical change involved please show on electrical sheets.
2. Sheet E1.0, change General Note 12 to indicate 2005 NEC, not 2008 NEC.
3. Sheet E1.1, area of SwitchGear installation, 2005 NEC 110.26.C--- The entrance to working space for large equipment rated at 1200 amps or more shall have one entrance at each end of working space. If a single unobstructed exit provided , the electrical equipment shall have twice the working space required by the table(110.26.A.1). Sheet A2.0 shows electrical room to be 7'wide . Provide measurements on Switchgear to verify proper working space provide per code , and proper exits provided.
4. The same section for above requires panic hardware or equal on door for exiting electrical room, show this on electrical sheets , 110.26.C.2.
5.E3.0, City of Tucson Submittal Requirements require a Lighting Calculation per Outdoor Lighting Ordinance #10135, for all outdoor lighting, can be obtained by City of Tucson web page under Departments , Development Services, Codes and Ordinances.
6. Sheet E6.0 , cannot locate circuits DIM-4b and 9b.
7. Sheet E6.1 , cannot locate circuit for bar lights.
8. Sheet E1.1, circuit A 29 for entry canopy lighting, not on sheet E3.0.
9. Sheet E1.1, cannot locate circuits A- 6,8,10,12,24,26,28,
and 30 on plan.
10. Sheet E4.0 , cannot locate circuit B-17,19 for item 255 blender.
11. Sheet E1.1, cannot locate Pnl C-24,26 on Sheet E4.0


Ray T Majuta, Elect Plan Review,
PDSD , City of Tucson, 2/20/10
Ray.Majuta@tucsonaz.gov
02/24/2010 TERRY STEVENS ZONING REVIEW Denied 02/24/2010

Development Services Department
Zoning Review Section

Terry Stevens
Lead Planner

Comments:

1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed.

2. Zoning could not verify that the building plan was in compliance with the approved site plan. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped site, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next building plan submittal.

3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
03/05/2010 GERARDO BONILLA OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
03/05/2010 SUE REEVES REJECT SHELF Completed