Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL TI
Permit Number - T10CM00104
Review Name: COMMERCIAL TI
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/28/2010 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 01/28/2010 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. SHEET S2.0 (PLAN NOTE 7); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS SHEET 8: THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE STUD WALLS ARE 2X6 @ 16" OC, WHILE THE PLAN NOTE INDICATES 2X4 @ 16" OC. CLARIFY. 2. SHEET S2.0 (PLANS); SHEET 1 (FLOOR PLAN): THE STRUCTURAL PLAN CONFIGURATIONS DO NOT MATCH THE ARCHITECTURAL. COORDINATE. 3. SHEET S3.0; DETAIL 103: THE DETAIL DOES NOT INDICATE ANY NEW FOOTING (F1) AS SHOWN ON THE FOUNDATION PLAN. THE NEW STUD WALL APPEARS TO BE IN A DIFFERENT LOCATION ON THE FOUNDATION PLAN COMPARED TO THE DETAIL. CLARIFY. 4. SHEET S3.0; DETAIL 104: THE DETAIL DOES NOT INDICATE ANY NEW FOOTING (F1) AS SHOWN ON THE FOUNDATION PLAN. CLARIFY. 5. SHEET S3.0; DETAIL 208: THE SECTION APPEARS TO BE CUT AT THE WRONG LOCATION ON THE FRAMING PLAN. VERIFY. 6. SHEET 1; FIXTURE SCHEDULE: THE WATER FOUNTAIN INDICATED IN THE SCHEDULE IS NOT SHOWN ON THE PLAN. PROVIDE. 7. SHEET 1; NOTES: PROVIDE THE NOTE REFERENCES ON THE PLAN. 8. SHEET 1: THE NEW OPENING (NOTE 8) IN THE EXISTING WALL REQUIRES STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS AND A DETAIL FOR THE NEW LINTEL. PROVIDE. 9. SHEET 1; FLOOR PLAN: PROVIDE INTERIOR ELEVATIONS AT THE BREAK ROOM TO INDICATE COUNTER/SINK ACCESSIBILITY. 10. SHEET 1; FLOOR PLAN: THE DEAD END CORRIDOR MUST MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF IBC SECTION 1017.3. THE CORRIDOR MUST ALSO MEET THE FIRE RESISTANCE RATING OF IBC TABLE 1017.1. VERIFY. 11. GENERAL: PROVIDE A FULLY DIMENSIONED SITE PLAN INCLUDING EASEMENTS, LOCATION OF PROPERTY LINES, STRUCTURE TO PROPERTY LINE SETBACK DIMENSIONS, EXISTING UTILITY METERS, PUBLIC SEWER CONNECTIONS, STREET NAMES FOR ALL ADJACENT STREETS, FULLY DIMENSIONED PARKING PLAN, AND TABULATION OF REQUIRED PARKING SPACES. REFER TO THE CITY OF TUCSON COMMERCIAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS. 12. GENERAL: INDICATE ON THE PLANS THE BREAKDOWN OF HOW THE MAXIMUM 20% OF THE PROJECT BUDGET IS ALLOCATED TO ACCESSIBILITY ISSUES. 13. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 01/28/2010 | ERIC NEWCOMB | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Denied | 1. SEE BUILDING COMMENTS. |
| 02/02/2010 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. The 2006 International Mechanical Code with Local Amendments and the International Energy Conservation Code with Local Amendments are the relevant codes for this project. 2. Revise the energy code analysis, coordinating the building components used in the analysis with those shown on the drawing. Reference: Section 502, IECC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson. 3. Clarify the nature of the rooftop units; heat pumps generally do not have natural gas service. Also, clarify the unit tags; two AC-1 units? Reference: Section 106.3.1, IMC2006 4. Provide guards for equipment located within 10 feet of a roof edge or of a walking surface that is elevated more than 30 inches above the adjoining grade. Reference: Section 304.10, IMC 2006. 5. Show the size, routing, and termination of the condensate drains. Reference: Section 307.2, IMC 2006 and Section 814.0, UPC 2006. 6. Provide calculations demonstrating adequate ventilation. Reference: Section 401.2, IMC 2006. 7. Show the exhaust fans for the restrooms, provide balancing information and the sequence of operation for the restroom exhaust fans to show that recirculation of the air from the restrooms will not occur. Reference: Section 403.2.1, IMC 2006. 8. Revise the mechanical design as required to avoid using the corridor as a return air duct. Reference: Section 601.2, IMC 2006. 9. Provide listed and labeled fire dampers for protection of ducts and penetrations of fire resistive walls. Reference: Sections 607.3, and 607.5.2, IMC 2006. |
| 02/02/2010 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide a site drawing showing the size, route, slope of the building sewer. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. 2. Show the location of the point of use water dispenser. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. 3. Provide underground facility tracer wires per ARS 40-360.22. 4. Provide roof drainage calculations and plans. Provide overflow protection for the roof. Reference: Section 1101.11, UPC 2006 |
| 02/02/2010 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Denied | Provide a site drawing showing the size and route of the building water supply along with the location and size of both the water meter and the reduced pressure backflow preventer assembly. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. |
| 02/02/2010 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/04/2010 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: 2820 E. Fort Lowell Road T10CM00104 Building Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 4, 2010 1. The building plans have been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning could not verify that the building plan was in compliance with the approved Development plan. Once all Planning and Development Services agencies have approved the Development plan zoning can approve the building plan. 3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved and stamped site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 C:\planning\grading\t10cm00104.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: |
| 02/04/2010 | LAITH ALSHAMI | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | |
| 02/04/2010 | RICHARD JIROUDEK | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Electric plans denied for the following: 1. Applicable code is 2005 NEC revise sheets 4 & 5. 2. Revise riser diagram to show proper conductor sizes. Is electric service included as part of DNR violaton T09 01315? All work to be included under violation to be shown as new could not find in permit history new electric service or RTU change out. 3. Label panels in riser diagram. Is panel "A" sub panel or service panel? 4. If panel "A" is sub pamel on riser diagram load on panel is exceeding ampacity of conductors feeding panel. 2005 NEC 310.15 5. Provide panel directories for service panel and sub panel. 6. Provide load calculations of service and any feeders per city submittal requirements. Include 1.25% of continuous loads. 7. Provide 2006 IECC light budget calculations per city submittal requirements. 8. Provide wattage for type "A" fixture. 9. Need to include restroom exhaust fans. Provide sequence of operation of restroom exhaust fans so fans operate whenever HVAC equipment is supplying air. See mechanical review comments 2006 IMC 403.2.1. 10. Show instahot on power plan need to include conductor size and disconnecting means per 2005 NEC 422.31(B). Include nameplate data. 11. Where roof top ac units replaced without permits? If so then need to be shown as new work on the submitted plans. Rich Jiroudek Electric Plns Exmn 520-954-0161 4. Provide panel directories for service panel and sub panel. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 02/05/2010 | SUE REEVES | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 02/05/2010 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |