Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING ALL
Permit Number - T10BU01891
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/10/2011 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Hannamans Holdings, LLC. DATE: March 10, 2011 3567 E Sunrise Drive, Ste. 219 Tucson, Arizona 85718 Subject: Family Dollar Store, 3000 E. Fairland Sv. Grading plan T10BU01891 (Second Review) T14S, R14E, Section 20 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Grading Plan and Drainage Report. The Grading Plan (GP) and Drainage Report (DR) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Grading Plan: 1. The GP and Site plan cannot be approved prior to the approval of the lot split (S11-010). 2. Grading plan clearly marked "GRADING PLAN". If the grading and site plan are combined on 1set of plans than the plans must be labeled both "Site/Grading Plan". Per previous comment. 3. Add the basin(s) maintenance responsibility note per S.M.D.D.F.M. 2.3.1.6 C 1 and 2 to the GP. Per previous comment. 4. A detail of the refuse enclosure shall be shown on the plan. Reference to the architectural plans does not suffice. Also see note 6. 5. Call out paving thickness per the geotechnical report on the plans, do not reference the report for thickness. 6. Show details of all surface materials. Either the vertical curbs and sidewalks are to be detailed to be able to construct them or they can be called-out per the applicable City of Tucson Development Standard. Revise as required. 7. Cut or fill slopes require a 2' minimum setback from property line. Cross-section A on sht.1 does not show a 2' setback from the property line. Revise as required. 8. Call out peak discharges entering and exiting the site. 9. Call out the height of the landscape berms on detail F/1. 10. Correct the Sheet Index to match the right number on the plans. Drainage Report: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DR. 2. DR addendums are not accepted. The revised portions of the DR must be incorporated into original DR. 3. Add the basin(s) maintenance responsibility note and checklist per S.M.D.D.F.M. 2.3.1.6 C 1 and 2 to the DR. 4. Cut or fill slopes require a 2' minimum setback from the property lines. Cross-section A on sht.1 does not show that a 2' setback from the property line. Revise as required. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4932 or Paul.Machado@tucsonaz.gov Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson - Planning and Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 837-4932 office (520) 879-8010 fax C:/3000 E. Fairland Sv. Grad. 2doc |
| 03/10/2011 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Family Dollar Store T10BU01891 Grading Plan (2nd Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 10, 2011 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning could not approve the grading plan until the site plan has been approved. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped site, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next grading plan submittal. 3. Zoning will re-review the grading plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved and stamped site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 C:\planning\grading\t10bu01891 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Grading plan and a copy of the approved site plan |
| 03/21/2011 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Ensure that all Engineering comments and concerns are addressed. |