Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: T10BU01174
Parcel: 11942006E

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: GRADING

Permit Number - T10BU01174
Review Name: GRADING
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
07/27/2010 ANDREW CONNOR NPPO REVIEW Passed
07/29/2010 DAVID RIVERA ZONING REVIEW Passed
08/02/2010 MATT FLICK ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied The SWPPP and grading plans are not recommended for approval. The following comments are offered:

SWPPP:

The SWPPP erosion control plan does not accurately depict all areas slated for disturbance and the erosion control measures associated with these areas. The foloowing comments are offered:

A) There is additional disturbance associated with construction of the sewer line north of the proposed athletic field. Please revise the erosion control plan to indicate the correct limits of disturbance and the associated erosion control measures.

B) There is additional disturbance associated with construction of the Mission Road improvements. Please revise the erosion control plan to indicate the correct limits of disturbance and the associated erosion control measures.

Construction Plans:

A) Sheets X1.0 - X1.2: General Note #2 refers to a 2"/4" pavement section. The geotech report and civil plans indicate a 2.5"/4" pavement section. Please correct or reference the paving plans for the pavement section.

B) Sheet X1.3: Detail 9 - The Fire Lane sign refers to the Golder Ranch F.D.; please correct.

C) Sheet C1: Paving notes 6-8 and 10-12 refer to COT jurisdiction. Please revise to reflect PCDOT jurisdiction.

D) Sheets C2-C5: Keynote 8 refers to a curb ramp detail on Sheet C8; there is none.

E) Sheet C10: No wingwalls are indicated on the Culvert Detail (Z). Is this the intent?

F) Sheets C11-C13: Please complete the horizontal control sheets.

G) Sheets C14-C21: It is assumed that these sheets are submitted for reference only as the permitting authorities will be PCDOT and TDOT. Please label these as being for reference only.

H) Sheets C22-C24: It is assumed that these sheets are submitted for reference only as the permitting authorities will be Tucson Water and Tucson Fire Department. Please label these as being for reference only.

I) Sheets C25-C27: It is assumed that these sheets are submitted for reference only as the permitting authority will be PCRWRD. Please label these as being for reference only.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
08/09/2010 GERARDO BONILLA OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
08/09/2010 SUE REEVES REJECT SHELF Completed