Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: GRADING
Permit Number - T10BU00828
Review Name: GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/25/2010 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: May 26, 2010 SUBJECT: 3108 E Prince Road Site and Grading Plan- Engineering Review TO: Star Consulting LOCATION: T13S R14E Sec28 Ward 3 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: T10CM01387 (Site Plan), T10BU00828 (Grading Plan) SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning and Development Services Department has received and reviewed the site plan (T10CM01387), Grading Plan (T10BU00828), Drainage Statement (Star Consulting, 05MAY10), and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (JE Fuller Hydrology & Geomorphology, Inc., 19MAY10) for the above referenced property. Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the plan sets at this time. The following items need to be addressed: SITE PLAN COMMENTS: 1) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.8: Revise the plan set to provide a separate detail or label Keynote #9 the asphalt paving design section. Provide the AC over ABC design for the vehicular use area for construction purposes. 2) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.8: Revise the plan set to include a label and detail for the required curb terminal section at the 35-foot curb opening location. The 6-inch vertical curbing on both sides must provide a terminal section per Standard Detail #212. 3) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.8: Revise the site plan to label and dimension the back-up spur provided at the end of the PAAL located west of the proposed vehicular use area on the site plan. The spur must have a minimum of a 3-foot radii and 3 feet in depth, but must also provide a minimum of 3 feet between the back of spur and any wall obstruction that is over 6 inches in height. Clearly label these dimensions in plan view. 4) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.8: Clarify on the site plan any parking spaces that will require wheel stops to prevent vehicles from encroaching into any adjacent pedestrian access points or landscape areas. Or provide a dimension to show that the vehicles do not overhang into these areas. 5) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.10: Revise the plan sheets to correctly dimension the 345-foot near side SVT (existing and future) for the PAAL access point on Country Club Road. Refer to DS Sec.3-01.5.1 for SVT procedures and criteria. Also provide a revised landscape plan to reflect the SVT shown on the plan set. 6) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.10: Revise the plan sheets to label and dimension the required SVTs at the intersection of Country Club Road and Prince Road that affect the northwest corner of the property. 7) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.11: Verify and label the 25-foot radii (Country Club Rd) and 18-foot radii (Prince Road) for the proposed driveways per City of Tucson Transportation Access Management Guidelines (TAMG), Section 5.5. Refer to DS Sec.3-01.3.2.C for street development standards. 8) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.11: Revise the site plan to clarify all curbing and/or concrete headers. Provide the location with a label to the Standard Detail for Public Improvement for the proposed improvement. Specifically for the PAAL entrances off of Country Club Road and Prince Road. If 6-inch vertical curbing is not proposed at a minimum a concrete header for the PAAL entrances will be required. Verify how all curb returns or headers are constructed and that they do not adversely impact existing improvements. 9) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.12: Revise the site plan to label the required sidewalk from the proposed building to the right-of-way of Prince Road per DS Sec.2-08.3.1. 10) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.12: Revise the site plan to dimension the proposed sidewalk along the south property line that connects to the right-of-way on Country Club Road. A clear 4-foot sidewalk width is required. Verify that all proposed gates meet the minimum 3-foot width requirement. 11) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.12: Provide a detail for the proposed sidewalk construction (Keynote #1 on the site plan). Or provide a reference to the Standard Detail for Public Improvement #200. 12) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.12: Refer to comments from Ron Brown, RA Structural Plans Examiner for all ADA and/or handicap requirements that may apply to this project. 13) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.16: Provide a General Note on the site plan to list the DSMR number, the Development Standard being modified along with the date of DSMR approval. A DSMR was submitted and approved for routing the 5-year retention volumes directly to the Rillito Creek. 14) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.32: Revise the plan set and detail for the proposed refuse container to meet the minimum requirements within DS Sec.6-01. Refer to Figure 3 and DS Sec.6-01.4.2 for specifications and requirements on access, placement of containers, and bin enclosure construction. Refer to Environmental Services for further clarity on refuse requirements. 15) Be advised that further comments may be forth coming on resubmittal of the site plan. GRADING PLAN COMMENTS: 16) Provide a copy of the stamped approved site plan (T10CM01387). The grading plan (T10BU00828) can not be approved until verification that all details, locations, dimensions, and plan profiles match the approved site plan. Verify all information associated with the site plan is shown on the grading plan sheet which will be used as the construction document. 17) Please ensure that the grading plan is consistent with the site plan and Drainage Statement. Grading standards may be accessed at: http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/DevStandsTOC.pdf. STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN: 18) The proposed SWPPP meets the minimum requirements of the AzPDES Construction General Permit (CGP). However the SWPPP and Exhibits can not be stamped approved until approval of the grading plan. Provide both copies with resubmittal for stamp approval. GENERAL COMMENTS: Please provide a revised site plan and grading plan that addresses the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. Enclose "redlines" with the resubmittal package. Further comments may be generated upon resubmittal of the site plan and grading plan review. For questions or to schedule an appointment I can be reached at 837-4929. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division COT Planning & Development Services |
| 05/26/2010 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Tucson Lodge #4 F&AM T10CM00828 Grading Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 27, 2010 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning could not approve the grading plan until the site plan has been approved. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped site, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next grading plan submittal. 3. Zoning will re-review the grading plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved and stamped site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 C:\planning\grading\t10bu00828 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Approved site plans and additional requested documents |
| 06/10/2010 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Ensure that all Engineering comments and concerns are addressed prior NPP / Landscape approval stamp. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06/23/2010 | DELMA ROBEY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 06/23/2010 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |