Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: T09SA00033
Parcel: 11942002A

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: LUCAPPS - OVERLAY ZONE REV

Permit Number - T09SA00033
Review Name: LUCAPPS - OVERLAY ZONE REV
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
02/09/2009 PETER MCLAUGHLIN ZONING REVIEW Denied CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Peter McLaughlin
Lead Planner

PROJECT: T09SA00033
Apartments at Mission
SCZ Overlay, HDZ Overlay

TRANSMITTAL: 2/09/2009

DUE DATE: 3/03/09

COMMENTS:

1. Indicate graphically on the plan how compliance with LUC Sec. 2.8.2.6 is achieved in regards to view corridors. Provide dimensioned lines clearly indicating the location and percentage of the view corridors though the project site.

2. Indicate the overlay zone case number (T09SA00033) in the lower right hand corner of all sheets of the site plan, landscape plan grading plan, etc. In addition, add the overlay case number, date of approval, and any conditions imposed to general note 20 on site plan sheet 3 of 6.


If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Peter McLaughlin (520) 837-4898 or e-mail peter.mclaughlin@tucsonaz.gov
02/17/2009 PETER MCLAUGHLIN LANDSCAPE REVIEW Approv-Cond 1. For clarity revise all areas of text overstrike, such as the dimensions/bearings labels along the south property line, the 30' SCZ Buffer label in the southwest corner of the site, and the text located within Buildings 5 & 6 on landscape plan sheet L-1, so that all information is legible.
02/27/2009 JASON GREEN ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied DATE: February 27, 2009
SUBJECT: HDZ and SCZ Overlay Zones- Engineering Review
TO: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager
LOCATION: 4601 S Mission Road, T14S R13E Sec34 Ward 1
REVIEWER: Jason Green, CFM
ACTIVITY: T09SA00033

SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received and reviewed the Hillside Development Zone (HDZ) and Scenic Corridor Zone (SCZ) Overlay application, preliminary site plan and grading plan sheets and the average cross slope analysis and does not recommend approval of the overlay application at this time. The preliminary grading plan sheet was reviewed for overlay application purposes only a grading permit application is required for a full grading review. The following items need to be addressed:

SITE/GRADING PLAN:

1) Be advised that the site plan (T08CM00284) and grading plan (T08BU00150) can not be approved prior to the HDZ and SCZ Overlay Application approval. This is the first submittal of the overlay application any changes may require a change in site plan design. The plan sets submitted for the HDZ and SCZ review are referred to as preliminary site and preliminary grading plan sheets.

HDZ OVERLAY COMMENTS:

2) DS Sec.9-01.2.3.D.1: In addition to the ACS sheet (Sheet 6) and calculation that was submitted with the preliminary site plan provide the average cross slope (ACS) analysis as a general note on both the preliminary site plan and grading plan sheets.

3) DS Sec.9-01.2.3.D.2: Revise the HDZ ACS plan sheet (Sheet 6) to clearly outline and indicate all slopes of 15% or greater on the property. Include the symbol used for delineating the area in the legend. The copy of the sheet submitted does not clearly delineate these areas due to the photocopy and/or reproduction of this sheet. The preliminary grading plan must also delineate these areas.

4) DS Sec.9-01.2.3.E: A note must be added to the preliminary site plan and preliminary grading plan listing those lots which are subjected to HDZ grading requirements for design purposes.

5) DS Sec.9-01.2.4.G: Revise the average cross slope calculation shown on Sheet 6 of 6 of the site plan. The average cross slope must be calculated through the mathematical formula represented in this section; specifically the end result must be multiplied by a linear adjustment factor which equals the number of contour lines less one line, divided by the number of contour lines.

6) DS Sec.9-01.4.2: Revise the preliminary site plan and preliminary grading plan sheets to meet the requirements of this section. The sloped area analysis must be shown and all slopes of 15 percent or greater must be clearly outlined and so indicated on the map. Refer to Landscaping comments for the required set aside areas if any portion of the proposed development disturbs these areas of 15 percent slopes.

7) DS Sec.9-01.5.1.A.2: Provide a general note on the preliminary site plan and preliminary grading plan stating "The portion of the site or lot to be left un-graded are to remain undisturbed are not to be used for stockpiling of materials or excess fill, construction vehicle access, storage of vehicles during construction, or similar uses. Temporary fencing will be installed on in order to prevent encroachment into these areas."

8) DS Sec.9-01.5.1.B: Verify that the cut and fill slopes meet the following requirements;

a) The maximum amount of cut is not to exceed 30-feet. Provide spot elevation in cross section view to verify the proposed height of all cut slopes.

b) The upper most point of an exposed cut slope is to be no higher than 15-feet above design grade. The preliminary grading plan shows Cross Section 12 and 13 in plan view however the cross sections on Sheet 3 need to clearly label elevation points to verify if this requirement has been meet.

c) The vertical distance of exposed fill and or exposed retaining material is not to exceed 15 feet. Provide spot elevation within the cross section or add additional cross sections to verify that the proposed retaining walls do not exceed the height restrictions, specifically for the north portion of the development.

9) Revise all notes on the preliminary site plan and preliminary grading plan to specifically address the project location. For example the notes of Sheet 3 of the preliminary site plan label streets and locations that do not coincide with the project location (i.e. Ironwood Hills Drive versus Mission Road).

SCZ OVERLAY COMMENTS:

10) Revise the preliminary site plan so that all slopes that fall within the 400-foot area are 3:1 (H:V) max and that they also meet the differential grading requirements per DS Sec.11-01. Vertical walls are not permitted per LUC Sec.2.8.2.

11) DS Sec.11-01.8.1: Revise the preliminary site/grading plan to clearly show that it meets differential grading requirements, specifically for the lots along the southern portion of the project. Verify that differential grading requirements have been met along with the SCZ overlay requirements of 3:1 (H: V) slopes.

12) Revise the following notes on the preliminary site plan sheets per the SCZ Overlay requirements (note that the bold words in the following comments are what need to be corrected and/or added):

a) Revise Note #20 on Sheet 3 of the preliminary site plan to list the Overlay application number assigned, T09SA00033 along with the date of approval and any conditions that are applicable. The overlay application number must also be listed in the bottom right hand corner of all sheets.

b) Revise Note # 22 on Sheet 3 of the preliminary site plan to state; "All new utilities for development on private property or public right-of-way along Mission Road will be underground. Trenching is permitted for the placement of utilities lines, area is to be re-vegetated in accordance with Land Use Code Sec. 3.7.5.2.D"

c) Revise Note # 23 on Sheet 3 of the preliminary site plan to state; "Building or structure surfaces, which are visible from Mission Road will have colors, which are, predominate within the surrounding landscape."

d) Revise Note # 24 on Sheet 3 of the preliminary site plan to state; "Fencing and freestanding walls facing Mission Road will meet material restrictions in Land Use Code Sec. 3.7.3, Screening Requirements."

e) Revise Note # 26 on Sheet 3 of the preliminary site plan to state; "All disturbed areas on the site that are visible from Mission Road and are not covered by permanent improvements shall be re-vegetated with native plants, plants from the Drought Tolerant Plant List, and/or a combination of both."

f) Revise Note #27 on Sheet 3 of the preliminary site plan to state; "Exposed cut and fill slopes shall be no greater than 3:1 (H: V) within the 30-foot undisturbed Natural buffer."

GENERAL COMMENTS:

Please provide a revised preliminary site plan and preliminary grading plan at re-submittal of the HDZ Overlay review that address the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. The site plan and grading plan permit applications can not be approved prior to the overlay applications. Verify that all corrections made for the overlay applications are changed on the site plan and grading plan submittals.

If you have any questions, I can be reached at 520-837-4929.




Jason Green, CFM
Senior Engineer Associate
Engineering Division
Development Services
03/02/2009 PATRICIA GEHLEN ZONING-DECISION LETTER WRITE DECISION LETTER Denied COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES

March 2, 2009

Paul Nzomo
Coronado Engineering and Development Inc.
4007 East Paradise Falls Drive #125
Tucson, Arizona 85712

Subject: T09SA00033 Scenic Corridor and Hillside Development Overlay Zones for 4601 S. Mission Road (T08CM00284)

Dear Paul:

Your submittal of February 2, 2009 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter for each agency explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed:

ALL BLUELINES MUST BE FOLDED

4 Copies Revised Overlay Zone submittal package as detailed in the on line comments (Zoning, Landscape, Engineering, DSD).



THE PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD WILL BE OPENED WITHIN THE NEXT TWO WEEKS.





Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919.

Sincerely,


Patricia Y. Gehlen
CDRC Manager

All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/


Via fax: 722-5394