Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Plan Review Detail

Plan Number: T09PI00013
Parcel: Unknown

Address:
1510 E 2ND ST

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: PIA SUBMITTAL

Plan Number - T09PI00013
Review Name: PIA SUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
04/23/2009 TAMI HAUSER UTILITY CLEARANCES COT STREETS DIVISION Denied PLEASE SUBMIT UTILITY CLEARANCE LETTERS
04/23/2009 TAMI HAUSER UTILITY CLEARANCES COT WATER NEW DEVELOPMENT Denied PLEASE SUBMIT UTILITY CLEARANCE LETTERS
04/23/2009 TAMI HAUSER UTILITY CLEARANCES PC WASTEWATER MGMT Denied PLEASE SUBMIT UTILITY CLEARANCE LETTERS
04/23/2009 TAMI HAUSER UTILITY CLEARANCES QUEST COMMUNICATION Denied PLEASE SUBMIT UTILITY CLEARANCE LETTERS
04/23/2009 TAMI HAUSER UTILITY CLEARANCES TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER CO Denied PLEASE SUBMIT UTILITY CLEARANCE LETTERS
04/23/2009 TAMI HAUSER UTILITY CLEARANCES COX COMMUNICATION Denied PLEASE SUBMIT UTILITY CLEARANCE LETTERS
04/23/2009 TAMI HAUSER UTILITY CLEARANCES SOUTHWEST GAS CORP Denied PLEASE SUBMIT UTILITY CLEARANCE LETTERS
04/23/2009 TAMI HAUSER UTILITY CLEARANCES EL PASO NATURAL GAS Denied PLEASE SUBMIT UTILITY CLEARANCE LETTERS
04/23/2009 TAMI HAUSER UTILITY CLEARANCES KINDER MORGAN ENERGY Denied PLEASE SUBMIT UTILITY CLEARANCE LETTERS
05/13/2009 LANCE PETERSON DOT STREET MAINTENANCE REVIEW Denied Sheet 3: Show the sidewalk on the plan, standing water at the lowest spot between sidewalks.
No comment from Landscape Maintenance.
05/18/2009 Blanca Espino DOT ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied PIA Plan
1. Please include a detail letter of explanation with the next submittal indicating where and how revisions were made. Single word responses are unacceptable. Include plans/redlines from previous plan submittal.

2. In title block, add assigned I-Plan Number, I-2009-018 to all sheets.

3. Indicate assigned DSD activity number T09PI00013 above title block. See redlines.

4. Basis of Elevation must reference COT field Book and Page. See redlines.

5. Sheet 2, Detail 2; The proposed modified sidewalk scupper with a mesh bar grate in place of the steel diamond plate is unacceptable. Due to the high pedestrian traffic, the proposed grate creates a hazard to the public's safety. This is not a standard practice for public improvement. Correct and revise.

6. Sheet 2, Detail 3; remove vertical curb from back of ramp. Remove tactile grooves. Correct and revise. See redlines.

7. Sheet 3, Existing Plan View; show and label the existing sidewalk scupper/pipe as seen physically in the field. See redlines.

8. Sheet 3, Proposed Plan View; Indicate flow arrows. Demonstrate that an unobstructed 6-foot wide public pedestrian pathway will be provided.

9. Sheet 3, Profile; Show the % slope. Between Sta. 38+00 and Sta. 39+00, show the elevation change on plan view. See redlines.

10. Sheet 3, Keynotes # 6 & #12, and SVT Detail; Lines of sight will not be obscured between thirty (30) inches and six (6) feet. Shrubs and small plants cannot exceed 30 inches in height. Tree canopy bottoms must be above 72 inches. Submit a copy of the Landscape/Irrigation plan.

11. See redlines for additional corrections.
05/18/2009 GARY WITTWER DOT LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied 1. Please submit landscape and irrigation plan. Need to add TDOT standard notes for planting in ROW
2. The planter shapes are not acceptable. They will promote unsafe conditions for pedestrians.
3. Vertical planter in ROW will need a TRE.
06/03/2009 JOSE ORTIZ DOT TRAFFIC REVIEW Denied Signing and Striping is acceptable, but the Traffic Signal modifications need to be reviewed by Bob Hunt. We will hold the plans and provide comments the week of June 8th.
07/08/2009 TAMI HAUSER PIA COORDINATOR CUSTOMER CALLED Completed
07/08/2009 TAMI HAUSER PIA COORDINATOR OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed