Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL NEW
Permit Number - T09CM03413
Review Name: COMMERCIAL NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12/30/2009 | DAVE MANN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/30/2009 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Provide roof drainage calculations and plans. All roof areas shall be drained by roof drains, scuppers, or gutters. Reference: Section 1101.11.1, UPC 2006. |
| 12/30/2009 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Project: 4325 E Pantano Rd New Softball Field,C/Stand,Maint Bldg. The electrical plans for this project have been denied for the following: 1. The 17 acres noted for the Outdoor Lighting Calculations, for the entire park or is there other lighting for this area? The lumen count for the actual ballfield lights are not included on the calculation. 2. The pole bases do not show any supplimental grounding, is this to be omitted? 3. Conductors going between the Section Panels in the SW Gear and the L:ighting Contactors, how are these adjusted as required in 2005 NEC,310.15.B.2.a, for deration? 4. Provide cut sheets for light fixtures as requested on Submittal Requirements(City OF Tucson). Ray T Majuta Elect Pln CK, City of Tucson 12/28/09 Ray.Maajuta@tucsonax.gov |
| 12/30/2009 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Lincoln Park Softball Field Complex T09CM03317 Building Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: December 29, 2009 1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning could not verify that the building plan was in compliance with the approved site plan.. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped site plan with the next building plan submittal. 3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved and stamped site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 C:\planning\grading\t09cm03317.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: |
| 12/30/2009 | RONALD BROWN | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Please provide a letter summary of all deferred submittals to Mr. LeeRay Hanly. 2. Please provide a completed Special Inspection Certificate for DSD review and approval as listed on sheet S0.2 STRUCTURAL REVIEW ERIC NEWCOMB 3. SHEET S1.2: ADD A NOTE ON THIS SHEET TO REFERENCE SHEET S3.1 FOR MASONRY LINTELS (ML1 IN THE STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS). 4. SHEET S1.3; STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS SHEET R3: THE STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS LIST RB2 AS A W12X30 ON SHEET R3 (CALCULATION ON SHEET R12 INDICATES W14X22), WHILE THE PLAN INDICATES A W14X22. CLARIFY. 5. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS SHEETS L6 THROUGH L11: CLARIFY WHERE THIS STRUCTURAL TUBE IS AND HOW IT FIGURES INTO THE LATERAL ANALYSIS (WHERE IS IT LOCATED ON THE PLAN?). 6. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS SHEETS PBF13 THROUGH PBF28: CLARIFY WHERE THIS STRUCTURAL TUBE IS AND HOW IT FIGURES INTO THE LATERAL ANALYSIS (WHERE IS IT LOCATED ON THE PLAN?). 7. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS SHEETS PBF53 THROUGH PBF56: CLARIFY WHERE THIS STRUCTURAL TUBE IS AND HOW IT FIGURES INTO THE LATERAL ANALYSIS (WHERE IS IT LOCATED ON THE PLAN?). 8. SHEET S1.4 (FOUNDATION PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET PBF34): THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE HAIRPINS TO BE #5 WHILE THE PLAN INDICATES #4. CLARIFY. 9. SHEET S1.4 (FOUNDATION PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET PBF41): THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE HAIRPINS TO BE #5 WHILE THE PLAN INDICATES #4. CLARIFY. 10. GENERAL: DEFERRED SUBMITTALS MUST BE APPROVED BY LEERAY HANLY BEFORE PLANS CAN BE APPROVED. 11. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 12/30/2009 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/30/2009 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Show how the office is capable of maintaining a minimum temperature of 68 F on a design heating day (32 F). Reference: Sections 309.1 and 312.1, IMC 2006. |
| 12/30/2009 | RSHERRY1 | WWM | REVIEW | Passed | No sewer-connected plumbing fixtures. |
| 12/30/2009 | MATT FLICK | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/30/2009 | RONALD BROWN | ADA | REVIEW | Denied | 1. At accessible details shown on sheet A3.1: a. Please show all critical waccessible dimensions b. Please remove vertical grab bar. This is not ADAAG standard. STRUCTURAL REVIEW FORTHCOMING |
| 12/30/2009 | SUE REEVES | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Passed | |
| 12/30/2009 | SREEVES1 | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Passed |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01/04/2010 | SUE REEVES | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 01/04/2010 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |