Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T09CM03408
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/19/2010 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Comment not resolved. No plumbing vents originate downstream of the backwater valves; a total cross-sectional vent area of 12.7 square inches (equal to a 4" diameter pipe) is required. Provide vent piping of sufficient size to comply with Section 904.1, UPC 2006. Vents located upstream from pumps, ejectors, backwater valves, or other devices that obstruct the free flow of gases between the building sewer and the outside atmosphere shall not be used for meeting the required cross-sectional vent area. |
| 04/20/2010 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | DATE: April 20, 2010 SUBJECT: 8578 E Broadway Blvd Site and Grading Plan- 3rd Engineering Review TO: MPE Attn: Lisa Bowers LOCATION: T14S R15E Sec16 Ward 2 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: T09CM03408 (Site Plan), T09BU01907 (Grading Plan) SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning and Development Services Department has received and reviewed the revised site/building plan (T09CM03408), Grading Plan (T09BU01907), Drainage Statement (Stanley Engineering & Drainage, Inc., 22DEC09), and Geotechnical Engineering Report (Terracon, 11NOV09) for the above referenced property. Engineering Division recommends approval of the plan sets at this time. For questions or to schedule an appointment I can be reached at 837-4929. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division COT Planning & Development Services |
| 04/20/2010 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Comment not resolved. Revise the energy code analysis, using the correct climate zone (Pima County < 4,000 feet, not the town of Pima, AZ) and the 2006 IECC. Reference: Section 302.2, IECC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson. 2. Comment not resolved. Revise the ventilation calculations using the appropriate occupancy type (Cafeteria/fast food, 100 persons/1,000 square feet) and correct for the use of a common ventilation system. Reference: Sections 403.3 and 403.3.2, IMC 2006. |
| 04/21/2010 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | Development Services Department Zoning Review Section Andrew Connor Comments: 1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering Section and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. |
| 04/23/2010 | DROBEY1 | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Needs Review |