Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Permit Number - T09CM03408
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/11/2010 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/16/2010 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/16/2010 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/17/2010 | ANDREW CONNOR | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Andrew Connor PROJECT: T09CM03408 8575 E. Broadway Blvd Site Plan TRANSMITTAL DATE: 02/02/10 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. DS 2-02.2.1.A.5 A search of the Pima County Assessors records indicates this property is shown as a separate parcel (134-09-018b). The design as shown appears to have the building located over the property line. A tax parcel combination will be required to be completed and a covenant regarding development and use of real property completed and recorded prior to approval of this site plan. Provide recording docket and page information for the covenant on the site plan. Provide appropriate documentation with next submittal 2. A lease area is indicated on the site plan. Approval of the lease area must be obtained by submitting through PDSD for a lot split. Completion and approval of the lot split must be obtained prior to approval of the site plan. Provide appropriate documentation with next submittal 3. DS 2-02.2.1.A.8 . This is required in order to verify the number of required parking spaces. The parking calculations (mixed use) for the shopping center as indicated on SP-2 do not meet the requirements of LUC Sec. 3.3.5.1 for mixed use parking. The calculations for a mixed use development does not apply to the specific use listed in Sec. 3.3.5.6 (shopping centers). 451 parking spaces are required 440 are provided. Revise plan as necessary, or a Board of Adjustment variance to reduce the number of spaces is required. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Andrew Connor, (520) 837-4950 C:\planning\cdrc\DSD\T09CM03408.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and additional requested documents |
| 03/19/2010 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/26/2010 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: March 30, 2010 SUBJECT: 8578 E Broadway Blvd Site and Grading Plan- 2nd Engineering Review TO: MPE Attn: Lisa Bowers LOCATION: T14S R15E Sec16 Ward 2 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: T09CM03408 (Site Plan), T09BU01907 (Grading Plan) SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning and Development Services Department has received and reviewed the revised site plan (T09CM03408), Grading Plan (T09BU01907), Drainage Statement (Stanley Engineering & Drainage, Inc., 22DEC09), and Geotechnical Engineering Report (Terracon, 11NOV09) for the above referenced property. Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the plan sets at this time. The following items need to be addressed: SITE PLAN COMMENTS: 1) Complied. 2) Complied. 3) Complied. 4) Acknowledged. 5) Complied. 6) Complied. 7) Complied. 8) Complied. 9) The seal on the Site Plan must be signed and dated by the Registered Architect of Record that prepared the plan set. None of the signed seals had the date of signature. GRADING PLAN COMMENTS: 10) Restated: Provide a copy of the stamped approved site plan (T09CM03408). The grading plan can not be approved until verification that all details, locations, dimensions, and plan profiles match the approved site plan. Verify all information associated with the site plan is shown on the grading plan which will be used as the construction document. 11) Complied. 12) Complied. 13) Complied. 14) Complied. 15) Complied. 16) Complied. 17) Complied. 18) Complied. 19) Complied. 20) Complied. 21) Complied. 22) Complied. 23) Complied. 24) Complied. 25) Complied. GENERAL COMMENTS: Please provide a signed and dated site plan from the Architect of Record and the proposed grading plan that addresses the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. For questions or to schedule an appointment I can be reached at 837-4929. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division COT Planning & Development Services |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 04/07/2010 | DELMA ROBEY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 04/07/2010 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |