Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T09CM03408
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/11/2010 | RONALD BROWN | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Where are the original structutral calculations for this project. They are not included with the resubmittal package. 2. A building permit will not be issued until the Special Inspection Certificates have been submitted and approved. END OF REVIEW |
| 03/11/2010 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/17/2010 | ANDREW CONNOR | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | 02/02/2010 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section Andrew Connor Comments: 1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering Section and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. |
| 03/19/2010 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Comment not resolved; hub drains are still specified in key note 4, P2.0 and key note 5, detail 2/P6.0. Hub drains are not approved for use under the UPC; they do not comply with Sections 411.1 and 804.1, UPC 2006. 2. Comment not resolved. All fixtures located on a floor less than 12" above the next upstream manhole shall discharge through a backwater valve; i.e. even fixtures that are roughed in above the floor in question, such as sinks or urinals, will still discharge through the backwater valve. The rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole (2656.00) is higher than the first floor elevation (2654.70). Provide a backwater valve per Section 710.1, UPC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson. 3. Provide vent piping of sufficient size to comply with Section 904.1, UPC 2006. Vents located upstream from pumps, ejectors, backwater valves, or other devices that obstruct the free flow of gases between the building sewer and the outside atmosphere shall not be used for meeting the required cross-sectional vent area. 4. Provide a direct waste connection for the wash and rinse sections of the 3-compartment sink, with an indirect connection for the sanitizing compartment only. Reference: Sections 304.0 and 801.2.3, UPC 2006. |
| 03/19/2010 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Comment not resolved. Revise the energy code analysis, using the correct climate zone (Pima County < 4,000 feet, not the town of Pima, AZ). Reference: Section 302.2, IECC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson. 2. Comment not resolved. Revise the ventilation calculations using the appropriate occupancy type (Cafeteria/fast food, 100 persons/1,000 square feet) and correct for the use of a common ventilation system. Reference: Sections 403.3 and 403.3.2, IMC 2006. 3. Clarify how the electrical interlock detail will cause the gas appliances to be rendered inoperative until the exhaust fan is started. Reference: Section 507.2.1.1, IMC 2006. |
| 03/22/2010 | RICHARD JIROUDEK | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Plans denied for the following: 1. Previous review comments not resolved. Provide information on electric details for Type I Hood showing automatic startup when cooking operations begin per IMC 2006 507.2.1.1. See Mechanical reviewer comments. 2. Sheet E2.1 shows bussing of Panel D rated @ 225 a. Sheet E2.0 one line has Panel D being fed with 400 amp breaker. 3. Provide response letter to review comments. 4. Provide letter with information on all revisions to E plans. Information to include what was revised and sheet numbers. Rich Jiroudek Electric Plns Exmn 520-954-0161 |
| 03/26/2010 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Building plan will be stamped approved with the approval of the site plan. Refer to site plan comments. |
| 03/31/2010 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 04/07/2010 | DELMA ROBEY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 04/07/2010 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |