Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T09CM03405
Parcel: 125076220

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: SITE

Permit Number - T09CM03405
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
01/05/2010 DAVE MANN FIRE REVIEW Approved
01/06/2010 RBROWN1 ADA REVIEW Passed Not a COT owned/operated property
01/06/2010 RONALD BROWN ZONING HC REVIEW Denied 1. Please provide an accessible route connecting Building One and Building Two.
2. Please provide a large scale detailsof the one "Van Aaccessible" parking space showing all dimensions, ramps, slopes and signage location.
3. Please provide a large scale accessible parking signage detail including a "Van Accessible" sign.
END OF REVIEW
01/08/2010 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied 1. Dimension future right-of-way(s) on the landscape plan

2. A street landscape border, per Sec. 3.7.2.4 of the LUC, is a landscape area with a minimum width of ten (10) feet, running the full length of the street property line(s) bounding the site except for points of ingress-egress. On streets designated as Major Streets and Routes (MS&R), the street landscape border is measured from the MS&R right-of-way line as determined by LUC 2.8.3.4.

3. An approved site plan is required indicating how the project will comply with LUC requirements when the MS&R right-of-way can no longer be used as part of the site. Such plan is to be an exhibit to an executed covenant for recordation stating the responsibility of the property owner, successor, or assignee as to the removal of improvements and compliance with the LUC at no cost to the City.

4. Identify all screening elements on the landscape plan.

5. All plant material used for landscaping shall be selected from the Drought Tolerant Plant List in Development Standard 2-16.0. Chitalpa tashkentensis is not on the list choose alternate plant material.

6. The site plan and landscape plan must show identical site layout to avoid conflict between the two plans. Ensure that all changes to the site plan are reflected on the landscape plan.

7. Additional comments may apply.
01/12/2010 ANDREW CONNOR NPPO REVIEW Approved
01/12/2010 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Denied 5DSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: Sam Hughes Court
T09CM03405
Site Plan (1st Review)

TRANSMITTAL DATE: January 12, 2010

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.

1. This site plan was reviewed for compliance with the City of Tucson Development Standards (D.S.) and Land Use Code (LUC) for full code compliance for the entire site.

2. This site is comprised of two (2) separate parcels. As neither parcel can stand alone and operate separately from the other a lot combination is required. Prior to approval of this site plan provide a copy of the approved Pima County Combination Request Form, and a copy of the recorded Covenant Regarding Development and Use of Real Property along with the recordation information, docket and page.

3. Based on future MS&R widening for Campbell Avenue and 6th Street it does not appear that the proposed project will meet the requirements of the Land Use Code and Development Standards when the widening of the MS&R's is done. Either design this project to meet the future MS&R widening for provide a future site plan that shows how this site will meet all requirements Land Use Code and Development Standards once the MS&R widening is done. The future site plan should meet all requirements of D.S. 2-02.0

4. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.2 Provide a property description, legal description, on the plan.

5. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.3 Provide a project address on the plan

6. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.6 There appears to be a patio cover located at the northwest corner of building 2. Clarify what the dashed line represents and provide a height if applicable.

7. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.7 Provide building elevations for both buildings so that perimeter yard requirements can be verified.

8. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.7 The following items are comments regarding perimeter yard setbacks;
East setback listed for Building 1 is based on a perimeter yard indicator "CC". Per LUC Section 3.2.6.4 the required perimeter yard to the east, commercial zone, is (H) the height of the structure.
South and West Setbacks listed for Building 1 to the street are based on LUC Section 3.2.6.5.B & Table 3.2.1.I, ADT of 1,000 or greater, 21' or the height of the structure measured from the back of future curb for both Campbell and 6th.
North setback is not applicable as this is interior to the site and not effected by a property line.

East setback listed for Building 2 is based on a perimeter yard indicator "BB". Per LUC Section 3.2.6.4 the required perimeter yard to the east, R-2 zone, is 10' or 3/4(H), the height of the structure, which ever is greatest. Based on a 25' wall height the required setback is 18'-9"
South setback is not applicable as this is interior to the site and not effected by a property line.
West Setbacks listed for Building 1 to the street are based on LUC Section 3.2.6.5.B & Table 3.2.1.I, ADT of 1,000 or greater, 21' or the height of the structure measured from the back of future curb for both Campbell and 6th.
North setback is not applicable as this is interior to the site and not effected by a property line.
North setback listed for Building 2 is based on a perimeter yard indicator "BB". Per LUC Section 3.2.6.4 the required perimeter yard to the east, R-2 zone, is 10' or 3/4(H), the height of the structure, which ever is greatest. Based on a 25' wall height the required setback is 18'-9"
All structures including patios and balconies area required to meet setbacks. Until building elevations have been provided the required setbacks cannot be verified. All street perimeter yard setbacks for this project are measured from the back of future curb. Provide dimensions from the back of future curb to the proposed buildings.

9. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.8 Provide an accessible vehicle parking spaces detail.

10. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.8 The vehicle parking space calculation shows 17 spaces, 5 garage spaces, provided. Clearly indicate on the plan where the garage spaces are located.

11. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.10 Show future sight visibility triangles (SVT) on the plan based on future curb location.

12. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 Per D.S. 2-08.3.1 within all development, a continuous pedestrian circulation/accessible route, sidewalk, is required. This continuous pedestrian circulation/accessible route must connect all public access areas of the development and pedestrian circulation path located in any adjacent streets. The areas within the development which must be connected include, but are not limited to, all buildings, all bicycle and vehicle parking areas, all recreation areas, all dumpster areas, and all other common use areas. That said clearly show on the plan how the required continuous pedestrian circulation/accessible route, sidewalk, is provided to 6th Avenue and the required connect between the two builds.

13. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 As this project is considered a commercial site all vehicle use areas must meet commercial standards. That said the access to the single vehicle parking space shown just west of Building 2 does not meet these requirements. Per LUC Section 3.3.7.2 the minimum width for a two-way parking area access lane is 24'-0"

14. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.13 If applicable show the location, type, size, and height of existing and proposed signage on the plan.

15. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.18 Label Campbell and 6th as an "MS&R".

16. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.25 If applicable show the existing and proposed site lighting on the plan.

17. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.28 Provide the existing zoning for the parcels located across both streets.

18. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.31 Provide the existing use on the site plan.

The following calculations are required on the site plan:

19. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.3 Provide a lot coverage for each zone, C-1 and R-2 that shows the building square footage, vehicle use area and the total.
20. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.4 The Bicycle parking calculation is not correct. Per LUC Section 3.3.4 Multifamily Dwellings 0-70 units/acre no bicycle parking spaces are required. Revise the calculation to show 0 spaces required.
21. Depending on how the above comments are addressed addition comments may be forth coming.
If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956.

C:\planning\site\t09cm03405

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and additional requested documents.
01/13/2010 PAUL MACHADO ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied To: Cardell Andrews II DATE: January 19, 2010
3025 W. Ina Rd.
Tucson, Arizona 85741

Subject: Sam Hughes Court, 502 N. Campbell Ave
Site plan T09CM03405 (First Review)
T14S, R14E, Section 08

RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Site Plan and Drainage Statement.

The Site Plan (SP) and Drainage Statement (DS) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal.

Site Plan:

1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the SP.
2. Contact TDOT and provide documentation as to the configuration of the future intersection widening.
3. Please provide property description per D.S. 2-02.2.1.3.
4. Label existing and future sight visibility triangles per D.S. 2-02.2.1.10.
5. Show all points of egress and ingress including locations and width of driveways (Dim. Northern most D/W) and parking area access lanes (P.A.A.L.) per D.S. 2-02.2.1.11.
6. Fully dimensioned loading space(s) and maneuvering area(s) per D.S. 2-02.2.1.14. Refuse enclosure is not accessible.
7. Please list estimated cut & fill quantities per D.S. 2-02.2.1.17.
8. Please show dimensioned right-of-way, including any applicable Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan right-of-way per D.S. 2-02.2.1.19.
9. Dimension from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways, and utility lines per D.S. 2-02.2.1.21.
10. Please provide existing topographic contours at intervals not exceeding two (2) feet and/or spot elevations as pertinent and Bench Mark based on City of Tucson Datum, including City Field Book and page number per D.S. 2-02.2.1.23.
11. Show Site plan number (T09CM03405) on all sheets per D.S. 2-02.2.1.29.
12. Show refuse container location, size, and access thereto fully dimensioned per D.S. 2-02.2.1.32 and D.S. 6-01.0.
13. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information.
14. Please show a typical cross section of the P.A.A.L. or call out the percentage of slopes. Call out the GB at the D/W, if applicable.
15. A grading permit will be required for this project. A grading permit may not be issued prior to site plan approval. Subsequent comments may be necessary, depending upon the nature and extent of revisions that occur to the plans. For more info contact Paul P. Machado at 837-4932 or Paul.Machado@tucsonaz.gov.

Drainage Statement:
1. The DS has been accepted by engineering.

If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4932 or Paul.Machado@tucsonaz.gov
Paul P. Machado
Senior Engineering Associate
City of Tucson/Development Services Department
201 N. Stone Avenue
P.O. Box 27210
Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210
(520) 837-4932 office
(520) 879-8010 fax
C:/502 N. Campbell Ave site
01/13/2010 PAUL MACHADO ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied REVISED SITE PLAN COMMENTS:

To: Cardell Andrews II DATE: January 19, 2010
3025 W. Ina Rd.
Tucson, Arizona 85741

Subject: Sam Hughes Court, 502 N. Campbell Ave
Site plan T09CM03405 (First Review)
T14S, R14E, Section 08

RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Site Plan and Drainage Statement.

The Site Plan (SP) and Drainage Statement (DS) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal.

Site Plan:

1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the SP.
2. Contact TDOT and provide documentation as to the configuration of the future intersection widening. Also see comment no. 8.
3. Please provide property description per D.S. 2-02.2.1.3.
4. Label existing and future sight visibility triangles per D.S. 2-02.2.1.10.
5. Show all points of egress and ingress including locations and width of driveways (Dim. Northern most D/W) and parking area access lanes (P.A.A.L.) per D.S. 2-02.2.1.11.
6. Fully dimensioned loading space(s) and maneuvering area(s) per D.S. 2-02.2.1.14. Refuse enclosure is not accessible.
7. Please list estimated cut & fill quantities per D.S. 2-02.2.1.17. It appears that the North portion of the project has substantial cut and it seems that the amount of the cut would warrant a revision of the earthwork quantities listed on the plans.
8. Please show dimensioned right-of-way, including any applicable Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan right-of-way per D.S. 2-02.2.1.19.
9. Key note no. 24 on sht. 2 of 4 indicates that water harvesting areas are to be depressed a minimum of 6" and the landscape plans are calling out a 12" depression. The depth for the depressed water harvesting areas shall be a maximum of 6". If the water harvesting areas are to remain at a depth greater than 6", than percolation tests shall be required with the results compiled in a drainage report. See DS comments.
10. The furthest most parking stall located in front of building 2 is adjacent to a pedestrian refuse area (sidewalk) and shall be separated by a physical barrier per D.S. 3-05.2.3.C.1.
11. Dimension from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways, and utility lines per D.S. 2-02.2.1.21.
12. Please provide existing topographic contours at intervals not exceeding two (2) feet and/or spot elevations as pertinent and Bench Mark based on City of Tucson Datum, including City Field Book and page number per D.S. 2-02.2.1.23.
13. Show Site plan number (T09CM03405) on all sheets per D.S. 2-02.2.1.29.
14. Show refuse container location, size, and access thereto fully dimensioned per D.S. 2-02.2.1.32 and D.S. 6-01.0.
15. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information.
16. Please show a typical cross section of the P.A.A.L. or call out the percentage of slopes. Call out the GB at the D/W, if applicable.
17. A grading permit will be required for this project. A grading permit may not be issued prior to site plan approval. Subsequent comments may be necessary, depending upon the nature and extent of revisions that occur to the plans. For more info contact Paul P. Machado at 837-4932 or Paul.Machado@tucsonaz.gov.

Drainage Statement:
1. The DS has been conditionally accepted by engineering.
2. The depth for all areas that are depressed for water harvesting shall be a maximum of 6". If the water harvesting areas are deeper than 6", than percolation tests shall be required with the results compiled in a drainage report to ensure proper infiltration rates per the Stormwater Ret./Det. Manual 3.5.1.3.a.

If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4932 or Paul.Machado@tucsonaz.gov
Paul P. Machado
Senior Engineering Associate
City of Tucson/Development Services Department
201 N. Stone Avenue
P.O. Box 27210
Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210
(520) 837-4932 office
(520) 879-8010 fax
C:/502 N. Campbell Ave site
02/03/2010 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Clarify the note on sheet 4 of 4 that calls for the use of "…a 4" x4" manufactured T or Y fitting…" at the HCS. Is this for the private sewer collection system only?
2. The rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole (2444.5') is less than 12" below the first floor elevation of building 1 (2445.37'). Note that a backwater valve per Section 710.1, UPC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson will be required for plumbing fixtures on the first floor of building 1.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
06/02/2010 GERARDO BONILLA OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
06/02/2010 SUE REEVES REJECT SHELF Completed