Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL NEW
Permit Number - T09CM03354
Review Name: COMMERCIAL NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/04/2010 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: 5301 E GRANT T09CM03354 Building Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: January 4, 2010 1. The plan have been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning could not verify that the plan was in compliance with the approved Development Package. Once all Planning and Development Services agencies have approved the Development Package zoning can approve the plan. 3. Zoning will re-review the plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved Development Package. Additional comments may be forthcoming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 C:\planning\grading\t09cm03354.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: |
| 01/05/2010 | ELIZABETH LEIBOLD | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | TO: George Stevenson, Jr., P.E. SUBJECT: TMC Bridge Plan Engineering Review ADDRESS: 5301 E Grant Rd FLOODPLAIN STATUS FOR PHASE 1: X-unshaded zone & A zone - contained in channel,1644K REVIEWER: Elizabeth Leibold, PE DATE: December 5, 2010 CASE NUMBER: D09-0032, T09BU01354 ACTIVITY NUMBER: T09CM03354 SUMMARY: The bridge plans set was submitted for review. Engineering Division does not recommend approval until the following comments are addressed. BRIDGE PLAN COMMENTS: 1) Provide a location map for bridges on cover sheet or 2nd sheet, labeling and identifying each bridge. 2) Development Package approval is required prior to issuance of permit. 3) Address the following comments for Bridge Sheets: a) Include a plan view sheet for grading area around each abutment. b) Identify which bridge will need utility line crossing conduits and show on section views. c) Clarify / add to title block on sheet 89 that this sheet is the Bridge Foundation Plan & Section sheet. d) Label WSEL's with distances between WSEL and low chord elevations on bridge sheets 97 & 99. e) OR, use updated sheets (sealed 12/16/09). 4) Floodplain Use Permit is required for this project for bridges. Submit City of Tucson's Floodplain Use Permit Application with next submittal. Please provide revised plan sheets, response letter, and City of Tucson Floodplain Use Permit Application that addresses the comments provided above. If you have questions, call me at 837-4934. Elizabeth Leibold, P.E., CPM, CFM Civil Engineer Engineering Division Planning & Development Services Department |
| 12/21/2009 | RONALD BROWN | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | Not a COT owned/operated property |
| 12/21/2009 | DAVE MANN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/23/2009 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 12/23/2009 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/23/2009 | RSHERRY1 | WWM | REVIEW | Passed | No sewer-connected fixtures. |
| 12/23/2009 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 12/28/2009 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. SHEET S12; RETAINING WALL NOTES (FOUNDATIONS): THE REFERENCED SOIL REPORT WAS NOT INCLUDED FOR REVIEW. PROVIDE. 2. GENERAL: DEFERRED SUBMITTALS MUST BE SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL TO LEERAY HANLY. 3. GENERAL: THE RETAINING WALLS WERE NOT INCLUDED IN THE PROJECT COSTS. PROVIDE RETAINING WALL HEIGHTS AND CORRESPONDING LENGTHS. 4. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 12/28/2009 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Project: 5301 E Grant Rd T09CM03354 Hospital Site Lighting The electrical plans have been denied for the following: 1. General Submittal Requirements state plans are to come with a minimum text size of 3/32" all uppercase, see specfication sheets and Outdoor Lighting Calculations, this is for copy purposes. 2. Provide fixture cut sheets as requested by General Submittal Requirements. 3.Fixture type B3 listed as 120 volt in fixture schedule, cannot be in Penthouse 600 Panel which is 480 volt, where will it be fed from. 4.Where circuit numbers only are indicated on plan also identify panel designation. 5. Panel loads do not include continuous duty for parking lighting,or other loads on 3 hrs or more. 6. Regarding the Outdoor Lighting Load Calculations, will this be the only lighting for all 30 plus acres? Is there any existing lighting on this site. Please address this per Section 3.1 of the Outdoor Lighting Code. Ray T Majuta PDSD City of Tucson, Elect Pln Ck, 12/28/09 Ray.Majuta@tucsonaz.gov |
| 12/29/2009 | BETH GRANT | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Passed | |
| 12/29/2009 | ERIC NEWCOMB | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01/07/2010 | DELMA ROBEY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 01/07/2010 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |