Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T09CM03317
Parcel: 13629003A

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: SITE

Permit Number - T09CM03317
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
12/18/2009 DAVE MANN FIRE REVIEW Approv-Cond Fire lane signs required along 24 ft wide road. See IFC Appendix D amendments.
12/21/2009 RBROWN1 ADA REVIEW Denied 1. At the passenger loading zone, please provide an accessible loading space as per code requirements 2006 IBC, Section 1106.7 and ADAAG Section 4.6.3.
2. For the accessible seating provided at each bleacher section:
a. Provide provide a sign or marker for the asile seats as per section 4.1.3 (19) a.
b. The office of OEOP, Mr. Marty Dupont also would like to have each wheelchair spaces identified with the international accessible symbol on the deck surface.
c. Please identify each space on the floor plan and provide a large scale detail.
3. There are no details nor specifications for the bleachers. Are these to be a Deferred Submittal? If so, please provide a letter to Mr. LeeRay Hanly summerizing the deferred submittals. There are additioal fees.
END OF REVIEW
12/21/2009 RONALD BROWN ZONING HC REVIEW Passed This is a COT owned/operated property reference ADA folder for comments
12/22/2009 MATT FLICK ENGINEERING REVIEW Approved The site plan is APPROVED. A resubmittal is required to re-stamp the corrected set of grading plans.

A separate submittal for the Escalante Road construction must be made to TDOT-Engineering Division, Permits & Codes.

The SWPPP is APPROVED.

The drainage report is APPROVED.

The following comments are offered to aid in correcting the grading plans:

Sheet C1.1: Please check the d.g. path elevations, longitudinal grades from the grade break near Sta. 15+00 to the high point about Sta. 18+00.

Sheet C1.1: Please label the elevation and provide nomenclature (HP or PVI) for Sta. 33+00 on roadway.

Sheet C1.1: Is there a HP near Sta. 11+50 on the d.g. path? There's a LP near Sta. 11+00 and the grade is decreasing at Sta. 12+00.

Sheet C1.3: Please label d.g. path adjacent to the PAAL and between the interfield walkways.

C1.4 Please label d.g. path adjacent to the PAAL, between the interfield walkways and leading to other areas of the park.

C5.4 Please check the north coordinates for the 2 northeasterly light poles.

Sheet 7.0 & 7.1: A separate PIA submittal is necessary for the Escalante Road improvements.

Matt Flick, P.E.
Project Manager
Planning & Development Services
City of Tucson

Phone: (520) 837-4931
Fax: (520) 791-4340

Please visit our web site: www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd
12/24/2009 ANDREW CONNOR NPPO REVIEW Denied All plants which are salvaged and transplanted on-site shall be rated as Viable and Transplantable per Development Standard 2-15.3.2 prior to relocation.

" Include on NPPO plan: per DS 2-15.3.4

" Limits of grading

" Location of temporary holding nursery to be used for salvaged plants.

" Maintenance of temporary nursery

" If necessary long term maintenance of plant materials

Future sites containing salvaged plants from this plan must have a separate transplant plan keyed to the approved inventory.

Add this note to Transplant plan: On-site monitoring of all aspects of site clearing, grading, plant protection, preservation, salvage, and mitigation shall be provided during project construction. The monitoring shall be performed by an individual who is qualified in arid lands native plant resource identification and protection as specified in Sec. 3.8.4, General Provisions and Requirements. The monitor shall provide periodic progress reports to the developer outlining the status of work accomplished and any problems encountered. A copy of these reports shall be submitted to the Development Services Department (DSD) for the project file.
12/24/2009 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Approved
12/28/2009 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Denied 5DSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: Lincoln Park Softball Field Complex
T09CM03317
Site Plan (1st Review)

TRANSMITTAL DATE: December 29, 2009

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.

1. This site plan was reviewed for compliance with the City of Tucson Development Standards (D.S.) and Land Use Code (LUC) for full code compliance for the area of expansion only.

2. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.2 Provide a property description, legal description on the site plan.

3. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.5 Provide overall lot dimensions and bearings for the entire site.

4. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.6 For all existing and proposed buildings and structures provide the size, height, overhangs, and canopies.

5. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 Per D.S. 2-08.3.1 within all development, a continuous pedestrian circulation/accessible route, sidewalk, is required. This continuous pedestrian circulation/accessible route must connect all public access areas of the development and pedestrian circulation path located in any adjacent streets. The areas within the development which must be connected include, but are not limited to, all buildings, all bicycle and vehicle parking areas, all recreation areas, all dumpster areas, and all other common use areas. Per D.S. 2-08.5.1.C Composition. Sidewalks will be constructed of:

1. Portland cement concrete, four (4) inches thick, with a smooth or broom finish; or
2. Brick pavers set in a bed of cement; or
3. Any surface equivalent in smoothness, hardness, and durability. Asphalt or asphaltic concrete may be used only for jogging paths, nature trials which are part of an accessible route, and pedestrian refuge areas which are not required to be connected to the pedestrian circulation path.
That said there are;
1. "8 FT. WIDE ASPHALT MULTI USE PATHS" called out throughout the plans that appear to be part of the required pedestrian circulation path. These paths must meet the requirements of D.S. 2-08.5.1.C
2. The proposed "STABILIZED DECOMPOSED GRANTITE PATH" appears to be part of the required pedestrian circulation path. These paths must meet the requirements of D.S. 2-08.5.1.C

6. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 Per D.S. 3-05.2.3.C.1 A vehicular use area must be provided with post barricades or wheel stop curbing designed to prevent parked vehicles from extending beyond the property lines; damaging adjacent landscaping, walls, or buildings; or overhanging adjacent sidewalk areas or unpaved areas on or off site and to prevent vehicles from driving onto unimproved portions of the site. This said the some type of barrier is require to prevent vehicles for driving off the proposed "24' - WIDE ENTRY ROAD" onto the unimproved areas.

7. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.13 If applicable show the location, type, size, and height of existing and proposed signage on the plan.

8. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.20 If applicable show all easements of record must be graphically shown on the plan together with recording docket and page reference.

9. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.28 Show the R-2 zone located along the southeast portion of this site.

10. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.31 Provide the existing and proposed use on the site plan. The existing use should be listed as "NEIGHBORHOOD RECREATION "6", SUBJECT TO SEC. 3.5.13.2 AND SEC. 3.5.13.3" and "GOLF COURSE "1", SUBJECT TO: SEC. 3.5.6.3". The proposed use should be listed as "NEIGHBORHOOD RECREATION "6", SUBJECT TO SEC. 3.5.13.2 AND SEC. 3.5.13.3"

The following calculations are required on the site plan:

11. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.1 Provide the Gross lot area of the entire site on the site plan.

12. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.2 Floor area for each building for the entire site.

13. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.3 Provide a lot coverage calculation that meets the requirements of LUC Section 3.2.9 LOT COVERAGE and a floor area ratio (FAR) that meets the requirements of LUC Section 3.2.11. The calculations should include the allowed and proposed lot coverage and FAR.

14. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.4 The vehicle and bicycle parking calculation includes the entire site i.e. park & golf course etc. Until all existing and proposed building square footage is provided the vehicle parking cannot be verified. The calculation is not clear, provide the square footage along with the vehicle parking ratio used for each calculation.
15. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.5 Until all existing and proposed building square footage is provided the loading space requirements cannot be determined. Provide a loading space calculation that includes the number required and the number provided.
16. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.6 Percentage of building or lot area expansion. If the building(s) or lot area have been previously expanded, those calculations shall be included.
17. Depending on how the above comments are addressed addition comments may be forth coming.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956.

C:\planning\site\t09cm03317

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and additional requested documents.
12/30/2009 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied The rim elevation of the next sanitary manhole (2765.7, sheet C-2.1) is less than 12" below the first floor elevation (2766.0, sheet C1.4). Provide backwater valve per Section 710.1, UPC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
01/04/2010 SUE REEVES OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
01/04/2010 SUE REEVES REJECT SHELF Completed