Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - SITE
Permit Number - T09CM03157
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/04/2010 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: James Autosports T09CM03157 Site Plan (2nd Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 4, 2010 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. This site plan was reviewed for compliance with the City of Tucson Development Standards (D.S.) and Land Use Code (LUC) for full code compliance the proposed parking restripe and site modifications only. Per the Zoning Administrator this is not an expansion of vehicle use area or site area. 2. This comment was not addressed. Parcels 122-18-233B, 122-18-233C, 122-18-234A will need to be combined using a Pima County Combination Request Form, and a Covenant Regarding Development and Use of Real Property. Once the three parcels are combined a cross access cross parking agreement will work between the remaining two (2) parcels. This site is comprised of four (4) separate parcels. As proposed none of the parcels can stand alone and operate separately from the others. A lot combination is required. Prior to approval of this site plan provide a copy of the approved Pima County Combination Request Form, and a copy of the recorded Covenant Regarding Development and Use of Real Property along with the recordation information, docket and page. 3. This comment was not fully addressed. Provide the Subject to Sections for all uses on the plan. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.31 List the proposed uses as, Automotive - Service and Repair "30", subject to: Sec. 3.5.13.5, Administrative and Professional Office "31", subject to: Sec. 3.5.13.5, and Commercial Storage "31", subject to: Sec. 3.5.10.1 4. This comment was not addressed. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.3 Provide a Floor Area Ration on the plan, see LUC Section 3.2.11. 5. Once the above comments have been addressed zoning is willing to provide an over the counter review. Please call or email to schedule an appointment for this review. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956. C:\planning\site\t09cm03157 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and additional requested documents. |
| 03/04/2010 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: March 4, 2010 SUBJECT: 3607 E Speedway Blvd- 2nd Engineering Review Site and Grading Plan TO: SCE Corporation Attn: Charles Corrales LOCATION: T14S R14E Sec04 Ward 6 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: T09CM03157 (Site Plan), T09BU01778 (Grading Plan) and T10OT00094 (Floodplain Use Permit) SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning and Development Services Department has received and reviewed the revised site plan (T09CM03157), grading plan (T09BU01778), Floodplain Use Permit (T10OT00094) and Drainage Report (SCE Corporation, 07DEC09) for the above referenced property. Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the site plan or grading plan at this time. The following items need to be addressed: NEW COMMENT: " Remove the Architect Seal from the plan since the plan was prepared, sealed and signed by the civil engineer. Or provide the signature and date of the Registered Architect on all sheets. SITE PLAN COMMENTS: 1) Acknowledged. 2) Restated: Revise the site plan sheet to provide the correct activity numbers assigned to this project. The reference to the FUP should read "T10OT00094" not T0DT00094. 3) Completed. 4) Completed. 5) Completed. 6) Restated; DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.8: Provide a cross access and cross parking agreement between the existing 2 lots. Or provide a lot combination approval through the Zoning Section. 7) Restated: DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.8: Revise the plan set to label the minimum 24-foot PAAL widths at all PAAL intersections, property lines and adjacent to both proposed refuse container locations. This was not fully addressed at the refuse locations. A minimum 24-foot clear PAAL width must be labeled even when the refuse container door is open. 8) Acknowledged. Gates to remain open during business hours. 9) Completed. 10) Completed. 11) Completed. 12) Completed. 13) Restated: DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.12: Provide a minimum 3-foot wide gate at the sidewalk location west of Bay 1. Per the plan set the proposed chain link fence crosses the sidewalk and does not label a pedestrian access gate, revise. Refer to comments from Ron Brown, RA Structural Plans Examiner for all onsite handicap and ANSI Standard requirements that apply to this project. 14) Acknowledged. The redline comment did not apply to the loading zone. However it has been noted that the proposed loading zone has been removed from the project. 15) Completed. 16) Restated: DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.19: Revise the plan sheets to label both Richey Blvd and Speedway Blvd as "Public." 17) Restated: DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.32: Revise the plan set and detail for the proposed refuse container that meets the minimum requirements within DS Sec.6-01. Revise the detail to clearly label the minimum 5-inch thickness for the concrete slab. 18) Restated: DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.32: Provide written approval from Environmental Services for refuse maneuverability. Provide the required 14-foot by 40-foot clear approach and verify the maximum allowed back up distance for maneuverability. Refuse vehicles can not back up into required parking spaces. 19) Be advised that further comments may be forth coming on resubmittal of the site plan and grading plan. GRADING PLAN: 20) Acknowledged. 21) Completed. 22) Completed. 23) Completed. 24) Restated: Provide a General Grading/Paving Note on the plan set to state all of the following, "Call for a Pre-construction meeting prior to start of earthwork. To schedule a PDSD Pre-construction meeting, SWPPP inspection or general Engineering Inspections, call IVR (740-6970), or schedule with a Customer Service Representative at the Planning Development Services Department, or contact PDSD Engineering at 791-5550 extension 2101, or schedule inspections online at: http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/Online_Services/Online_Permits/online_permits.html" FLOODPLAIN USE PERMIT: 25) Restated: A Floodplain Use Permit (T10OT00094) was submitted for this project due to the improvements within the mapped 100-year floodplain per the referenced Drainage Report. The Floodplain Use Permit will be approved and conditioned based upon grading plan approval. GENERAL COMMENTS: Please provide a revised site plan and grading plan set that addresses the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. Enclose "redlines" with the resubmittal package. Further comments may be generated upon resubmittal of the plan review. A meeting is requested for this project prior to resubmittal to help ensure a timely review, call me at 837-4929. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division COT Planning & Development Services |
| 03/05/2010 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Required street landscape borders shall be located entirely on site, except that, if approved by the City Engineer or designee. Move all required plant material on site or obtain permission for use of ROW 2. Indicate square footage of all required landscaped areas and calculation of the percentage of vegetative coverage per DS 2-07.2.2.2.g. 3. A 30" continuous screen along entire street frontages for vehicle use area must be provided per LUC Table 3.7.2-I. Identify screening all elements. 4. The screening requirement is in addition to the landscape requirements. The use of vegetation to satisfy the screen requirement is allowed only to provide for alternative treatment and is not to imply that the vegetative screen can also be used to meet the landscape requirement. 5. The site plan and landscape plan must show identical site layout to avoid conflict between the two plans. Ensure that all changes to the site plan are reflected on the landscape plan. 6. Additional comments may apply. |
| 03/11/2010 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Darken the detectable warning strip at the accessible parking aisle just prior to entering the PAAL. 2. The accessible route connection to the public right of way pedestrian path way does not work. It abutts into a sloping ramp. Please redesign. 3. Please show the international symbol in the most Easterly accessible parking space on sheet C2. 4. Providev a 3' wide gate in the chain link fence where the accessible travels through to the Richney Blvd. public right of way. 5. On sheet C3 please indicate the bottom of the main accessible parking sign to be 7' from finished grade as per COT DOT standards. END OF REVIEW. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 03/12/2010 | GERARDO BONILLA | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 03/12/2010 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |