Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL NEW
Permit Number - T09CM03146
Review Name: COMMERCIAL NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12/02/2009 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Denied | need to review location/method of connection to public sewer-cannot have a cleanout in the public ROW per PCRWRD/Don Willholt & dsc/2nd floor Subhash Ravel- Need manhole tap permit for 6" HCS PCRWRD 3RD Floor/ Yvonne 740-6733 |
| 12/03/2009 | DAVE MANN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | PLEASE INCLUDE HYDRANT LOCATION(S) WITH SITE PLAN |
| 12/04/2009 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: T09CM03146 101 W. Irvington Road #10 Building Plan Review Health Center - Medical Service Outpatient Use TRANSMITTAL DATE: December 7, 2009 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Zoning has reviewed the building plan for compliance with the site plan. As of this review date the site plan has not been approved by all CDRC/PDSD plan reviewers so technically the building plan cannot be approved by zoning at this time. 2. Zoning will re-review the building plans on the next submittal and compare them to the approved site plan if available. Zoning cannot approve the building plans until the Building Plans Reviewers approve the plans and an approved plan and stamped is available and included. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised building plans. |
| 12/07/2009 | RONALD BROWN | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Need approved site plan. 2. Need partition schedule, none shown, no wall sections shown a. Elevator shaft and elevator machine room to be one hour rated as per 2006 IBC, Sections 707.2.2, 707.4 and 3006.4. 3. Toilet room large scale plans have no dimensions. Please provide critical accessible dimensions on all floor plans to show ADAAG compliance. Generic copied ADAAG details are not acceptable. 4. Please provide actual desgined toilet elevations. Generic copied ADAAG details are not acceptable. a. Please show smooth, HARD, nonabsorbent wainscoating as required bty 2006 IBC, Section 1210.2. 5. Where is receptionest counter? This needs to be shown for accessibility compliance. 6. Please provide roof top mounted HVAC equipment structural calculations. 7. At the roof plan, please provide scupper detail. STRUCTURAL REVIEW COMMENTS T09CM03146 ERIC NEWCOMB 8. GENERAL: PROVIDE A PAGE IN THE STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS INDICATING A BEAM LAYOUT PLAN FOR THE ROOF. IT IS NOT CLEAR (E.G. PAGE 4 OF THE CALCULATIONS INDICATES A ROOF BEAM ALONG GRID BB BETWEEN GRIDS 2.1 AND 3.1. THIS BEAM IS NOT ON BB, BUT IN THE VICINITY). 9. GENERAL: PROVIDE A PAGE IN THE STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS INDICATING A BEAM LAYOUT PLAN FOR THE FLOOR. 10. GENERAL: PROVIDE A PAGE IN THE STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS INDICATING A COLUMN AND FOOTING LAYOUT PLAN. 11. SHEET 3.1; EAST STAIR AND SOUTH STAIR: THE STAIR COLUMNS INDICATE C10. THERE IS NO C10 IN THE SCHEDULE. CLARIFY. 12. SHEET 3.1; STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (PAGE 91): DID NOT LOCATE THESE COLUMNS. 13. SHEET 5.1; STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (PAGE 39): DID NOT LOCATE THIS BEAM (NO BEAM ON THIS GRID IS 29' LONG). CLARIFY. 14. SHEET 5.1; STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (PAGE 41): THERE ARE TWO BEAMS ALONG THIS LINE, ONE IS 8' LONG (PER DESIGN) WHILE THE OTHER IS ABOUT 13' LONG. CLARIFY. 15. SHEET 5.1; STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (PAGE 81): THE JOIST LENGTH ON THE CALCULATION IS 5', WHILE THE PLAN INDICATES ABOUT 12'. CLARIFY. 16. SHEET 5.2; STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (PAGE 20): THE STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS INDICATE THE BEAM DESIGN IS A W18X35, WHILE THE PLAN INDICATES A W16X35. CLARIFY. 17. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. END OF REVIEW |
| 12/07/2009 | RONALD BROWN | ADA | REVIEW | Denied | REFERENCE THE BUILDING FOLDER FOR COMMENTS |
| 12/10/2009 | RICHARD JIROUDEK | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Plans denied for the following: 1. Provide 2006 IECC light budget calculations and luminaire switching per city submittal requirements. 2. Designate on plans which areas are Patient Care and if they are General Care, Critical Care, and/or Wet Location. 3. Add note to lighting and power plans Patient care areas to be wired per NEC 517.13. 4. EM lighting in RM 168 and 165 to be connected to lighting circuit serving area. NEC 700.12(F) 5. EM lighting in MEZZ 200 to be connected to lioghting circuit serving area. NEC 700.12(F) 6. Several EM lights 2nd Floor have no circuit numbers assigned to them. 7. Unable to locate following circuit on plans L1A-10 panel schedule states Lighting Rm 162 and 163. Rich Jiroudek Electric plans examining 520-954-0161 |
| 12/11/2009 | ELIZABETH LEIBOLD | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Development Package must be approved prior to building permit issuance. |
| 12/11/2009 | ELIZABETH LEIBOLD | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Appears this is not a Development Package. However, Site Plan and Grading Plan required. |
| 12/14/2009 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Coordinate the waste and vent piping for the 1st and 2nd floors; 4"S from the 2nd floor is not noted on the first floor plan except near rooms 107 and 108. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. 2. Clarify what is being called out with a blank keynote in the 2nd floor wall between rooms 262 and 268. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. 3. Clarify where the waste and vent riser diagrams shown on sheet 15.7 have been taken from. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. 4. Clarify keynotes 2, 9, and 14 on sheet 15.3. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. 5. The elevator sump pump (detail 212/15.11) and its discharge piping are not shown on the plumbing plans. Show the route and termination of the discharge pipe. (Verify with the State of Arizona that 10 GPM is the appropriate flow rate.) Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. 6. Provide the rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole. Determine the need for a backwater valve per Section 710.1, UPC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson. 7. Provide a site drawing showing the size and route of the building water supply along with the location and size of both the water meter and the reduced pressure backflow preventer assembly, and the route and slope of the building sewer. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. |
| 12/14/2009 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/15/2009 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide energy code compliance calculations using the correct climate zone for Pima County < 4,000 feet. Provide sufficient detail on the drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the building envelope. The information shall, as a minimum, include U-factors of the envelope systems and fenestration components, along with the R-values of the insulation and the SHGC for the fenestration. Reference: Sections 101.4 and 104.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2006. 2. Provide smoke detectors in the return air duct, upstream of any outside air connections. Reference: Section 606.1, IMC 2006. 3. Show the size, routing, and termination of the condensate drains from fan coils FC-1 and FC-3. Reference: Section 307.2, IMC 2006 and Section 814.0, UPC 2006. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12/15/2009 | SUE REEVES | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 12/15/2009 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |