Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T09CM03091
Parcel: 137055320

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL NEW

Permit Number - T09CM03091
Review Name: COMMERCIAL NEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
11/25/2009 DAVE MANN FIRE REVIEW Approv-Cond Be advised that approval of these plans does NOT constitute approval of fire sprinkler plans. Separate submittal of sprinkler plans is required. Also, please refer to notes on sheets FP 1.1 and FP 2.0.
12/02/2009 ERIC NEWCOMB BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. SHEET S3.1 (ROOF FRAMING); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 5): THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE J2 IS A 32LH JOIST AT 7'-6" SPACING, WHILE THE PLAN INDICATES 26K JOISTS AT 7'-6" SPACING. VERIFY.
2. GENERAL: A MINIMUM LETTERING HEIGHT OF 3/32" IS REQUIRED ON ALL DRAWINGS (SEE SHEETS S1.1 AND S3.1). PLEASE REVISE.
3. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS.
12/03/2009 ERIC NEWCOMB ZONING HC REVIEW Approved
12/08/2009 JASON GREEN ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied DATE: December 9, 2009
SUBJECT: 5379 S Calle Santa Cruz- Engineering Review
TO: MPE Attn: Lisa Bowers
LOCATION: T15S R13E Sec02 Ward 1
REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM
ACTIVITY: T09CM03091 (Building Plan), T09BU01757 (Building Plan) and T09BU01756 (Grading Plan)

SUMMARY: Engineering Division of the Planning and Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed Discount Tire Store building plan (T09CM03091), TI Storage Racks building plan (T09BU01757), grading plan (T09BU01756), and Geotechnical Evaluation (MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc., 19FEB09) for the above referenced property. Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the building plans or grading plan at this time. The following items need to be addressed:


BUILDING PLAN COMMENTS (New Discount Tire Store and TI Storage Racks):

1) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.8: Revise Keynote #3 on Sheet A2.0 to provide specific details for the proposed "black" concrete within the vehicular use area. Or provide said details on the grading plan sheets for construction purposes. Verify that thickness, psi, etc for construction purposes are called out.

2) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.8: Revise Detail 7/A2.1 to dimension all aspects of the proposed accessible parking requirements. Length, width, 2.5 foot overhang, curbing, etc.

3) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.12: Refer to comments from Ron Brown, RA Structural Plans Examiner for all onsite handicap and ANSI Standard requirements that apply to this project.

4) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.20: Verify that all existing easements that are shown on the plan set that are in conflict with the building pad location have been abandoned. Specifically the Public Utility Easement as shown on the Utility Sheet, C1.04 and on the Architectural Building Plan sheets. All easements must be abandoned prior to building plan approval. If the easements have been previously abandoned provide the documentation with Docket and Page for verification.

5) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.32: Revise the plan set to label and dimension all requirements for the proposed refuse enclosure. Verify that all details meet the minimum requirements within DS Sec.6-01, Figure 3. Provide a detail on the grading plan sheets for construction purposes.

6) Clarify Keynote #42 on Sheet A1.0. The paragraph seems to have a typo, "….OTH?#?.?!?2?(????er…", revise.

7) Be advised that further comments may be forth coming on resubmittal of the building plans.


GRADING PLAN:

8) Revise the Title on the Cover Sheet of the Plan set to read "Discount Tire Company: Grading, Paving and Building Plans." Since the grading plan sheets have been submitted with the building plan package the Cover Sheet should represent all plans that are included.

9) Provide the cut and fill quantities on the grading plan sheets under the General Note Section and/or the Site Information Section for clarity purposes. The quantities provided on Sheet 1.02 were written in by hand, verify.

10) Revise Sheet C1.01 of the grading plan to include the telephone contact information for the Developer under the Project Information Section.

11) Verify that all existing easements that are shown on the plan set in conflict with the building pad location have been abandoned. Specifically the Public Utility Easement as shown on the Utility Sheet, C1.04 and on the Architectural Building Plan sheets. All easements must be abandoned prior to building plan approval.

12) Revise the grading plan sheets and/or details to provide site specific construction details for the proposed project. All construction details (i.e. refuse enclosures, vehicular use area, curbing, parking spaces, etc) should be on the civil sheets which act as the construction document. If the applicant chooses to use the Architectural Sheets for construction purposes then 1) verify that all details provided meet the minimum requirements within the development standards and Standard Details for Public Improvement and 2) verify that the keynotes and details don't refer back to the civil drawings which in turn refer to the Architect drawings.

13) Revise Sheet C1.02 of the grading plan to label and keynote the proposed/existing concrete bollards at the end of the PAAL located on the east side of the site.

14) Clarify the handicap access ramps and vertical curbing labeled at the proposed handicap parking spaces on Sheet C1.02. The ramps proposed imply that the curbing in front of the parking spaces is depressed and/or a concrete header. However per Keynote #1 it is shown as vertical curbing, clarify.

15) Revise all Construction Notes on Sheet C1.02 of the grading plan that reference the Architectural Plan sheets. Either provide a separate detail for construction purposes on the civil sheets (highly recommended) or at a minimum clearly reference the exact Architectural Sheet and/or detail where the improvement may be located for construction purposes.

16) Provide a General Note on the grading plan sheets to include the reference to the Geotechnical Evaluation prepared for this project. Provide the date, job number, engineer who prepared the report, etc.

17) DS Sec.11-01: Provide a General Note on the grading plan sheets specifying conformance with City of Tucson Development Standard 11-01.0 (excavation and grading requirements).

18) Provide a General Note on the grading plan sheets stating; "All proposed fencing and walls will require a separate permit for review and approval by all necessary Planning and Development Services Departments."

19) Provide a General Note on Sheet C1.01 to state; "All landscaping to be depressed minimum 6-inches for stormwater harvesting. Refer to the Water Harvesting Guidance Manual Ordinance # 10210 dated October 25 for further recommendations for stormwater harvesting."

20) Provide a General Note on Sheet C1.01 to state; "Call for a Pre-construction meeting prior to start of earthwork. To schedule a PDSD Pre-construction meeting, SWPPP inspection or general Engineering Inspections, call IVR (740-6970), or schedule with a Customer Service Representative at the Planning and Development Services Department, or contact PDSD Engineering at 791-5550 extension 2101, or schedule inspections online at: http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/Online_Services/Online_Permits/online_permits.html

21) Please ensure that the grading plan is consistent with the Architectural site plan sheets. Grading standards may be accessed at: http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/DevStandsTOC.pdf.


GENERAL COMMENTS:

Please provide revised building plans and grading plan sheets that address the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. Enclose "redlines" with the resubmittal package.

Further comments may be generated upon resubmittal of the building plan and grading plan review.

For questions, or to schedule an appointment, I can be reached at 837-4929.



Jason Green, CFM
Senior Engineer Associate, Engineering Division
COT Planning & Development Services Department
12/10/2009 GERRY KOZIOL WWM REVIEW Denied need IWC review of oil interceptor- Tom Tomchak- 443-5200
5025 W Ina Rd
12/14/2009 DAVID RIVERA ZONING REVIEW Denied PDSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: David Rivera
Principal Planner

PROJECT: T09CM03091
5379 S. Calle Santa Cruz
Building Plan Review
Discount Tire Center - Auto Service Repair Major Use

TRANSMITTAL DATE: December 14, 2009

COMMENTS:

The site plan sheet A2.0 and the building plans were reviewed concurrently and therefore the comments reflect the both reviews.

Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.

1. Zoning has reviewed the building plan for compliance with the site/development plan. As of this review date the architectural site plan (sheet A2.0) has not been approved by all PDSD plan reviewers so technically the building plans cannot be approved at this time. While the basic footprint of the building floor plan matches the unapproved version of the site plan sheet A2.0 zoning cannot approve the plans at this time.

2. Zoning will re-review the building plans on the next submittal and compare them to the approved site plan if available. In addition zoning cannot approve the building plans until the Building Plans Reviewers approve the plans and an approved and stamped site plan is available and included.

3. On sheet A2.0 a 10-foot existing PUE is depicted under the proposed building location. This easement was not represented on the development plan. Prior to any approval of the building plans or Architectural site plan the easement must be abandoned and relocated if still needed.

4. Label all recording information and purpose for all existing or proposed easements on sheet A2.0.

5. Detail 17 on sheet A2.1 has not been labeled with a detail name. Is this detail for truncated domes or access ramps or both? Revise.

6. Detail 7 on sheet A2.1 should be renamed to for the specific detail it represents, which I believe was intended to be for the dimensions of the accessible sign painted on the pavement for the accessible parking spaces.

7. Note one (1) in detail 7 of sheet A2.1 must be revised to require the bottom of the sign to be seven (7) feet from grade not six (6) feet.




If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608.

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised building plans.
12/16/2009 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Revise the design of the roof access ladder to comply with Section 306.5, IMC 2006.
2. Coordinate the roof framing plan with the mechanical plan to identify the additional framing required for the evaporative coolers. Reference: Sections 106.3.1 and 302.1, IMC 2006.
3. Show that the total amount of ventilation air introduced by the HVAC unit is sufficient to supply the air required for transfer to the restrooms and for ventilation of the other spaces being served by the HVAC unit. Reference: Sections 403.2.2 and 403.3.3, IMC 2006.
12/16/2009 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Clarify the purpose of the reduced pressure backflow preventer located in the Janitor room; the State-required reduced pressure backflow preventer to protect the municipal water distribution system is located next to the water meter (see sheet C1.04). Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. See also: http://www.tucsonaz.gov/water/docs/backflow-ord.pdf
2. Indicate the size of the outlet on the trench drain. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006.
3. Indicate the size and slope of the horizontal rainwater piping. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006.
4. Show that the restroom floors slope toward the floor drains. Reference: Section 411.2, UPC 2006.
5. Show how the temperature of the hot water supply to the public lavatories is controlled. Reference: Section 413.1, UPC 2006 and Section 504.3, IECC 2006.
6. Provide a vacuum relief for storage-type water heaters located above any fixture outlets. Reference: Section 608.7, UPC 2006.
7. The fixture connection sizes called out for the urinal flush valve will result in water velocities greater than 8 FPS. Limit the water velocity to less than 8 FPS for the copper piping (approximately 15 GPM). Reference: Section A 6.1, UPC 2006 and IS 3-2003, Section 2.6.
8. Provide water pressure and water pipe sizing calculations. Reference: Section 610.1, UPC 2006.
9. Provide upper terminal cleanouts on horizontal drainage pipes exceeding 5 feet in length (horizontal drain lines serving sinks and urinals require cleanouts regardless of length). Reference: Section 707.4, UPC 2006.
10. Provide a vent for the sand/oil interceptor on the sewer side per Section 1017.1, UPC 2006. This vent shall not connect to the vapor vent currently shown on the drawing.
12/16/2009 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Approved
12/18/2009 RAY MAJUTA ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 5379 S Calle Santa Clara
T09CM03091
Discount Tire Store


The Electricval Plans have been denied for the following:

1. City of Tucson submittal for plan review requires compliance with The City of Tucson Outdoor Lighting Code #10135. A calculation showing compliance is required. See City of Tucson web page for Outdoor Lighting Code #10135.

2.The Service Requirement Book for Tucson Electric Power shows an avilable fault current of 55,600 amps for a 600 amp, 120/208 volt service. The oneline diagram on sheet E-3 shows fault current at 42,000 amps.

R T Majuta,
Elect Plan Check,DPSD, City of Tucson,
12/21/09
Ray.Majuta@tucsonaz.gov

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
01/11/2010 CPIERCE1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
01/11/2010 SUE REEVES REJECT SHELF Completed