Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T09CM03032
Parcel: 116300050

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: RESIDENTIAL BLDG/ZONING/ENGINE/WWM

Permit Number - T09CM03032
Review Name: RESIDENTIAL BLDG/ZONING/ENGINE/WWM
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
11/23/2009 DAVE MANN FIRE REVIEW Approved
11/25/2009 GERRY KOZIOL WWM REVIEW Denied NEED 13 GREYWATER CONDITIONS ON PLUMBING DRAWINGS. LIST ENCLOSED WITH PLANS.
11/30/2009 ANDREW CONNOR NPPO REVIEW Denied Add the following notes to the site / grading, and NPP plan(s) (Including heading):

CITY OF TUCSON
DEVELOPMENT STANDARD NO. 9-04.0
HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT SITE IMPROVEMENT

A. Vegetation Retention.

1. Existing trees with four (4) inch or greater trunk diameter and cacti will be preserved in their original locations, except for building sites and access and utilities serving building sites.

2. When retention of the above trees and cacti in their original locations is not possible due to building site location, the trees and cacti will be salvaged and replanted in areas requiring re-vegetation, whenever possible.

B. Re-vegetation. All cut or fill slopes, which are no steeper than three (3:1) and all utility trenches or septic leaching fields which are not located in parking or driveway areas will be re-vegetated in compliance with the following requirements.

1. All plants used in re-vegetation must be the same as the native vegetation on the site or any adjacent site prior to grading or clearing.

2. Re-vegetation will be accomplished with the following minimum requirements for plants.

a. Native trees, a minimum of fifteen (15) gallon size with a minimum trunk diameter of two (2) inches measured at the soil level, or large specimen cactus will be placed at the same vegetation density found on the site prior to any clearing, grubbing, or grading.

b. Seeds for trees, desert shrubs, and grasses will be planted with a density adequate to control erosion and may use one of the following methods of planting or any other method approved by the Zoning Review Section at DSD.

1) Raked into the soil with appropriate mulch materials;
2) Hydro-seeding;
3) Anchored mulches; or
4) Established on jute, rolled straw, or similar material.

C. A temporary watering system must be installed until the re-vegetation materials is established.

D. NPPO pre permit inspection is required prior to grading inspection can be scheduled by calling IVR system and entering inspection code 09015 or calling Landscape Field Representative directly @ 837-4950

Ensure that all Engineering comments and concerns are addressed prior to landscape / NPP approval.
12/04/2009 MICHAEL ST. PAUL ZONING REVIEW Approv-Cond CDRC TRANSMITTAL


FROM: Michael St.Paul, Planning Technician

PROJECT:
T09CM03032 (T09BU01718 grading)
3362 West Lost Starr Place
New SFR


TRANSMITTAL: December 4, 2009


COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.


This site is located in the Wildcat Pass (S02-008) subdivision. The subdivision is a Residential Cluster Project (RCP-4) in the R-1 Zone (LUC Section 2.3.4.2.A.3).

This plot plan is conditionally approved relative to the following condition:

An approved grading plan is required to approved this plot plan. Please be aware that portions of the patio, planters, spa and pool encroach into the ERZ and revisions to the plot plan may be necessary.

Additional comments may be necessary relative to changes made to subsequent plot plans on future submittals.
12/10/2009 ELIZABETH LEIBOLD ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied DATE: December 10, 2009
TO: Greg Carlson, PE
SUBJECT: 3362 W LOST STARR PL Site Plan Review
LOCATION: Lot 5 Wildcat Pass
REVIEWER: Elizabeth Leibold
ACTIVITY NUMBER: T09CM03032

Summary: Engineering Division has reviewed the site plan portion of the submittal package and does not recommend approval at this time. Address the following comments for resubmittal.

SITE PLAN COMMENTS:
1) DS Sec.3-01.4.4.B: Revise cross section and/or provide the following additional cross sections for clarification to provide and label the Final Plat EHSB line on planviews and in section details. Add note to plans that EHSB was determined by engineer to be at 100-year floodplain limit per drainage report etc.
2) Show Final Plat floodplain limits per plat on planview and label both sets of floodplain delineations.
3) Per General Note 11 on the Final Plat, a floodplain use permit is required for this lot. Submit application for Floodplain Use Permit with next submittal.
4) DS Sec.11-01.2.1.A: Site Plan may be labeled as Site/Grading Plan.
5) DS Sec.11-01.4.1.C.3: Delineate disturbance limits to show as including utilities and the limits need to provide for sufficient space for grading construction. It may be necessary to indicate heavy duty construction fence to restrict construction activity along the side yard grading limit boundaries.
6) Indicate grade break location and elevation on plan view for interceptor swale at top of north cut slope near concrete bench.
7) Provide a few additional proposed spot elevations in rear of yard north of kitchen to indicate positive draiange away from foundation and toward drainage focal points. Clarify any stair elevations.
8) DS Sec.11-01.4.1.C: Address the following General Notes comments:
a) Add reference to the City of Tucson Development Standards 11-01 for grading standards.
b) Add that the project will comply with City of Tucson Land Use Code Sections 2.8.1 Hillside Development Zone (HDZ).
c) DS Sec.11-01.4.1.C: Add note that rip rap slopes shall have handplaced rip rap with filter fabric per HDZ requirements.
9) For resubmittal, provide 2 copies of the revised Site/Grading Plan and any other supporting documents, with a response letter.

I can be reached at 837-4934 if you have questions or would like to set up a meeting to go over resubmittal.

Elizabeth Leibold, PE
Civil Engineer
Engineering Division
Planning & Development Services Department
12/17/2009 ERIC NEWCOMB BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. SHEET A4 (SE CORNER RAMPS); SHEET A17 (SECTION 10): THE SECTION REFERENCES THE FOUNDATION PLAN FOR FOOTING SIZE, BUT MAKES NO REFERENCE ON THE PLAN. COORDINATE WITH THE KEYED NOTE.
2. SHEET A4 (VARIOUS WALLS); SHEET A17 (SECTION 15): THE SECTION REFERENCES THE FOUNDATION PLAN FOR FOOTING SIZE, BUT MAKES NO REFERENCE ON THE PLAN. COORDINATE WITH THE KEYED NOTE.
3. SHEET A4 (WALL AT SOUTH PROPERTY LINE): MAKE A REFERENCE ON THE PLAN TO THE KEYED NOTE. CUT A SECTION THROUGH THE WALL.
4. SHEET A6; ROOF FRAMING PLAN: REMOVE "PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION" NOTE.
5. SHEET A6 (ROOF FRAMING PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 15): THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE HEADERS HD3, 4, AND 5 ARE HSS6X6X1/4, WHILE THE A6 SCHEDULE INDICATES HSS6X6X3/16. CLARIFY.
6. SHEET A17; SECTIONS 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, AND 15: CHANGE THE REFERENCE 2/A4.
7. SHEET GSN (STRUCTURAL STEEL); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 2): THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE BOLTS SHALL BE A325 (HIGH STRENGTH) WHILE THE DRAWINGS INDICATE A307. CLARIFY.
8. SHEET GSN (MASONRY BLOCK): REVISE NOTE "IF ACTUAL HEIGHT OF WALL IS NOT LISTED IN TABLE BELOW, USE STEEL AND DIMENSIONS FOR NEXT HIGHEST WALL LISTED". MAKE A REFERENCE TO TABLES ON SHEET S-RW1.
9. SHEET S1: LETTERING MUST BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT ON ALL SHEETS.
10. SHEETS S1, S2, S3, AND S4 (SHADE SCULPTURES): NO REVIEW WAS PROVIDED ON THESE SHEETS. REVIEW WILL BE COMPLETED WHEN STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS ARE PROVIDED.
11. SHEET S-RW1; DETAILS 1, 2, AND 3: CHANGE REFERENCE 2/A4.
12. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS: BEAM B4 (SHEET 9) COULD NOT BE LOCATED ON SHEET 4 OF THE CALCULATIONS. PROVIDE.
13. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS.
12/18/2009 KEN VAN KARSEN BUILDING-RESIDENTIAL REVIEW Denied PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS T09CM03032

Plan review for the above referenced structure has been completed. This letter reflects comments to be addressed. In order to facilitate a shorter back check time, we request that you please provide revised plans and calculations, highlighting any changes, along with a written response to each of the noted items indicating action taken.

SCOPE OF REVIEW:
The scope of this plan review covers architectural, plumbing, mechanical, energy conservation and electrical. All code references are to the 2006 International Residential Code, 2006 International Energy Conservation Code, and Arizona State amendments to the 2006 Uniform Plumbing Code. All features were checked only to the extent allowed by the submittals provided. All portions of this project are assumed to meet or will meet other departmental requirements, conditions and concerns before permit approval.

GENERAL REQUIREMENTS:
All corrections and revisions shall be made on original tracings or a finished reproducible set. Return two sets along with a set of the first submission for reference. Pen or pencil corrections on final prints will not be acceptable. To avoid delays, ensure that all corrections have been made, are complete, and have been coordinated on all applicable detail and note sheets. (Do not cloud the changes made for comment revisions). Incorporate changes on originals and provide two copied sets for review.

All engineers and architects involved in the design of the structure are to seal the related sheets of plans, details and calculations in accordance with the rules of the State Board of Technical Registration.

The City of Tucson adopted the 2006 IRC with amendments on 6/12/2007; the 2006 UPC with amendments on 7/10/2007; effective 1/1/2007 the Inclusive Home Design; starting 3/1/2009 Solar Water Preparation and 7/1/2009 Solar Photo-Voltaic Preparation. All new SFR and duplex plans should reference these codes. Amendments to adopted codes are at the City web-site http://www.tucsonaz.gov: Planning, Building, & Business; under the Building topic; Building Ordinances and Codes; Building Codes

PLAN VIEWS:

1. Provide a Second Floor Roof Plan with equipment layout (sheet A9), R106.1.1.
2. Show the garage floor direction of slope, R309.3.

STRUCTURAL PLANS:

1. Note a proposed location and weight of the future Solar Panel loads on the roof framing plan for verifying the truss load carrying capacity used for the engineered truss design, M1401.

SECTIONS - DETAILS:

1. Show the ceiling gypsum board as either 5/8" or ½" sag resistant when applied to 24" o/c ceiling framing, IRC table R702.3.5 footnote d.
2. Show fiber-cement board or glass mat gypsum backers for tiled walls in tub and shower areas, R702.4.2.

PLUMBING PLANS:

1. Show the water meter size required for providing the designed flow rate, P2602.1.1.
2. Provide water hammer arresters wherever quick-closing valves are installed in a water distribution system. The devices should conform to ASSE 1010-2004. Water hammer arresters are required for clothes washer, dishwasher and refrigerator water connections, IRC P2903.5.
3. Provide manufacturer specification sheets for collector panels and exchanger showing SRCC compliance.
4. Show the water softener discharge disposal line and termination.

ELECTRICAL PLANS:

1. Revise the General Note #1/E3 showing the minimum mounting height if 15" consistent with the Inclusive Home Design.
2. Show overcurrent protection not exceeding the allowable conductor ampacity, E3605.5. Revise the wire size shown at Panel A1 circuit #9, 11.
3. Show a receptacle outlet within 3' of the 1st floor Bath lavatory basin, E3801.6.
4. Show or note a disconnect means or a locking breaker for the water heater, E4001.5.
5. Show the receptacle at the Spa with a minimum of 5 feet from the water edge, E4103.4.5.
6. Specify recessed lighting with 3" separation from combustibles or IC listing, R808, and compliance with energy efficiency leakage, N1102.4.3.

If you have any questions please contact:
Ken Van Karsen
(520) 837-4912
City of Tucson Residential Plan Review

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
01/07/2010 DELMA ROBEY OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
01/07/2010 SUE REEVES REJECT SHELF Completed