Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T09CM02836
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/24/2009 | ERIC NEWCOMB | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 11/24/2009 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/03/2009 | RICHARD JIROUDEK | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/07/2009 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: 5301 E GRANT T09CM02836 Building Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: December 7, 2009 1. The building plans have been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning could not verify that the building plan was in compliance with the approved Development Package. Once all Planning and Development Services agencies have approved the Development Package zoning can approve the building plan. 3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved Development Package. Additional comments may be forthcoming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 C:\planning\grading\t09cm02836.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: |
| 12/11/2009 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | The calculations for the roof drains are acceptable but the sizes for the individual scuppers are not clearly stated. The minimum scupper width is the circumference of the required roof drain per Section 1101.11.2.1, UPC 2006. Detail J4/A311 shows a 10.25" wide scupper which will meet the minimum width requirements for roof areas less than or equal to 2,147 square feet. Clearly indicate the scupper widths for each occurrence. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. |
| 12/11/2009 | ELIZABETH LEIBOLD | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | TMC base plan not yet approved so building plans can not be approved. |
| 12/14/2009 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. The submitted energy code compliance calculations for the building envelope refer to a roof construction as "other"; provide the supporting documentation as described in footnote b of the calculations. Reference: Section 101.4, International Energy Conservation Code 2006. 2. The submitted ventilation calculations illegible and also appear to be based on a different edition of the ASHRAE standard. Reference: Section 401.2, IMC 2006. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12/21/2009 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 12/21/2009 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |