Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T09CM02836
Parcel: 11012094A

Address:
5301 E GRANT RD

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL NEW

Permit Number - T09CM02836
Review Name: COMMERCIAL NEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
10/27/2009 PATRICIA GEHLEN ZONING REVIEW Denied The building plans may not be approved until the development plan is approved.
10/28/2009 BETH GRANT COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING Approved
10/29/2009 GERRY KOZIOL WWM REVIEW Approved
10/29/2009 RAY MAJUTA ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied Project: 5301 E Grant Rd , T09CM02836
Pediatric Wing Remodel

The Electrical Plans have been denied for the following, please address each individually.

1. Provide Interior Lighting Compliance Calculations for review. Did review the submitted 2006 IECC certificate.
2. Provide a fault current calculation for new panels, 2005 NEC,110.9.
3. Provide notation on plans to the effect------- Installation To Comply With The 2005 NEC Article 517, Health Care Facilities. Include individually the following:
a. 517.13, Grounding of Receptacles and Fixed Equipment in Patient Care Areas per Sections A and B.
b. 517.16. Receptacles to be Identified after Installation.
c. 517.18, Receptacles to be Hospital Grade
d. 517.19, Critical Care Areas, Emergency System Receptacles shall be identified and shall also indicate the Panelboard and circuit number supplying them,
e. 517.30,C.1, Essential Electrical Systems for Hospitals, requirements--- Separation of Life Safety and Critical Branch Systems, to be kept independent of other wiring,
f. 517.30.C.3, Mechanical Protection of Emergency Systems,
g. 517.32 Life Safety Branch,
h. 517.33 Critical Branch,
These references requested for the installers and inspectors in order to make them aware of the strict requirements of The NEC.
4. Sheet E201 Keyed Note #4, states to be fed from existing circuits in area, name circuits and ID panel.
5. Sheet E201, name circuits which feed emergency lights in corridor area.
6. Sheet E201, which circuits will feed the photo cell and the two lighting contactors this sheet?
7. Sheet E202, Keyed Note #9, connect to existing circuits in area, Id circuits and panels.Correct loads if required.
8. Sheet E202 provide a count of lights being changed out ,with no change to circuitry.
9. Sheet E203, same as previous,
10. Sheet E205, The Patient Room Circuit Assignment Schedule on this sheet is for the Lighting Assignment, use Power Assignment Schedule,check other sheets.
11. Sheet E207, Keyed Notes#2 and #3, state connect to existing circuitry in area, ID and name panel for these.
12. Sheet E207, the Power Plan shows ST"s 33,34,36 thur 45, however the Electrical Feeder Schedule this sheet shows ST's 1 thur 15 , also they are connected to Pnl GYN EB 1 and 3. Is this a new use for these, if so include panel schedule.
13. Sheet E301, Penthouse, FCU-3 circuits 8,10,12 Pnl DR
4BI LEBI should be Circuits 20,22,24.
14. Sheet E301 Feed to new 75 kva transformer from SW DR4-2L-LS should be 125 amps.
15. Sheet E301 Feed to new 75 kva transformer from SW DR4- 2L-CB should be 125 amps.

Ray T Majuta
Elect Pln Ck,
PDSD City of Tucson
Ray.Majuta@tucsonaz.gov
11/02/09
10/29/2009 ERIC NEWCOMB BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied STRUCTURAL:
1. SHEET S-200; STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS SHEET 133: THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE FOOTING 34 SHOULD BE 7'-6" X 7'-6" X 1'-4" (SHEET 144), WHILE SHEET S-200 INDICATES F6 (7'-0" X 7'-0" X 1'-4"). CLARIFY.
2. SHEET S-200; STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS SHEET 133: THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE FOOTING 40 SHOULD BE 7'-6" X 7'-6" X 1'-4" (SHEET 146), WHILE SHEET S-200 INDICATES F12 (4'-0" X 4'-0" X 1'-0"). CLARIFY.
3. SHEET S-200; SHEET S-400 (DETAIL 9); THE REFERENCE AT THE TAPERED BRICK WALL TO SEE THE PLAN FOR THE BOTTOM OF THE FOOTING: THE BOTTOM OF THE FOOTING IS NOT INDICATED ON THE PLAN. CLARIFY.
4. SHEET S-500; SECTIONS 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 17, 18 AND 19: PROVIDE WELD SIZES, LENGTHS, AND SPACING AS REQUIRED AT STEEL BENT PLATES, CONNECTION PLATES, OUTRIGGERS, ANGLES, ETC.
5. SHEET S-501; VARIOUS SECTIONS: PROVIDE WELD SIZES, LENGTHS, AND SPACING AS REQUIRED AT STEEL MEMBERS.
6. SHEET S-501; DETAIL 7: REVISE THE PLATE THICKNESS AS SHOWN ON THE 4X4 PLATE (FROM 3/6).
7. GENERAL: CONCERNING THE METAL STUDS USED ON THIS PROJECT (WALLS AND BRACING), WHO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THEIR DESIGN? WALL STUDS ARE REFERRED TO THE ARCHITECT, WHILE METAL STUD BRACING SIZE, SPACING, AND CONNECTIONS ARE REFERRED TO THE LIGHTGAGE CONTRACTOR. THE ARCHITECT AND ENGINEER NEED TO COORDINATE THE DESIGN AND CONNECTIONS FOR ALL METAL STUDS, AND INDICATE THOSE ON THE DRAWINGS.
8. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES FOR ALL REVIEW COMMENTS.

4 November 2009
T09CM02836/TUCSON MEDICAL CENTER - PEDIATRIC AND MOTHER/BABY ADDITION
REVIEWED BY RON BROWN

COMMERCIAL REVIEW ARCHITECTURAL
2006 IBC

DENIED: SEE COMMENTS BELOW

1. Please provide a smoke/fire partition coordination check between sheet G-110 and sheet nos. A111, A112, A113 and A114. A spot check review has revealed some inconsistencies, i.e. the partition where door 15048B is located is 1 hour rated on sheet G-110 and on sheet A-111 is not rated.
2. Please provide the appropriate number of water coolers as required by Chapters 29 and 11 and ANSI 117.1, Section 602.4
3. Scupper design details B6, J4 and F4/A-311 do not appear to have sufficient volume capacity and is easily stopped up from debris collection. Reference Mechanical comments.
4. Can not find on Roof Plan where detail D6/A-140 is relevant. Please clarify. Please reference Mechanical comments
DOOR SCHEDULE
5. Please provide a rated door assembly check of the door schedule and sheets G-110, A-111, A-112, A-113 and A-114. A spot check has revealed some inconsistencies: i.e.: please reference comments below.
6. Door number 15048B is scheduled as a non rated door while being shown on sheet G-110 to be in a 1 hour rated partition. Please clarify.
7. Door number 15048A is scheduled as a 45 minute rated door while on sheets G-110 and A-111 it is indicated to be in a 1 hour rated smoke barrier partition which requires a 20 minute rating as per "Wall Partition Type Legend" on sheet G-110.
8. Please be more specific about fire rated frames and door assemblies having fire seals at frame and sill other than (as per general note 10) "as required.
a. Also, please note on referenced head, jamb and sill details a smoke/fire sealant and sill closure.
9. Please insure that all exit doors are equipped with panic and fire exit hardware as required. Please note such hardware on the door schedule.

END OF REVIEW
10/30/2009 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Provide calculations to show that the roof drains and scuppers for the new roof areas (including any contributory areas from the existing roofs) comply with the minimum requirements of Sections 1101.11 and 1106.0, UPC 2006.
2. Clarify how the drainage of the existing roof near column M'-18 is to be accommodated. Reference: Sections 103.2.3 and 1101.11, UPC 2006.
3. Provide calculations to show that the scupper and downspout detail B6/A311 provides adequate primary and secondary drainage where the assembly is installed. Reference: Sections 1101.11 and 1106.0, UPC 2006.
4. Provide sufficient information to show that the medical gas and vacuum system has been sized at least per Section 1314.0, UPC 2006.
5. Clarify the oxygen, medical air, and vacuum pipe sizes near room 15036.
10/30/2009 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Approved
11/03/2009 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Where is sheet 2-200 that is referenced on sheet M-206? Reference: Section 106.3.1, IMC 2006.
2. Provide energy code compliance calculations for the building envelope. Reference: Section 101.4, International Energy Conservation Code 2006.
3. Show that the specified pipe insulation thicknesses for chilled water, heating water, and steam (Specification Section 230719, 2.02) are at least equivalent to the requirements of Section 503.2.8, IECC 2006.
4. Specify the minimum R-values for interior and exterior ductwork. Reference: Section 503.2.7, IECC 2006 as amended by the City of Tucson.
5. Show how the fan and blower coil units are being connected to the building structure and provide calculations to show that the building structure is not being adversely affected. Reference: Section 302.1, IMC 2006.
6. Provide structural calculations to verify that the existing roof is capable of supporting the additional dead load due to the installation of the roof top units. Reference: Section 302.1, IMC 2006.
7. Show the size, routing, and termination of the condensate drains for the fan and blower coil units. Reference: Section 307.2, IMC 2006 and Section 814.0, UPC 2006.
8. Provide calculations demonstrating adequate ventilation. Reference: Section 401.2, IMC 2006.
11/03/2009 ELIZABETH LEIBOLD ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied 1) Development Package must be approved prior to biulding plan approval.
2) Courtyard drainage shall be provided per plumbing comments. Show how minimal roof drainage will be allowed to enter courtyard to minimize potential flooding conditions. Secondary outlet system is required in courtyard for positve drain down. Address in Development Package's draiange report and show on building plans.

Call if you have questions,
Elizabeth Leibold PE
837-4934
11/05/2009 RONALD BROWN ZONING HC REVIEW Denied 5 November 2009
T09CM02836/TUCSON MEDICAL CENTER - PEDIATRIC AND MOTHER/BABY ADDITION
REVIEWED BY RON BROWN

ACCESSIBILITY REVIEW
2006 IBC, Chapter 11 and ICC (ANSI) 117.1 2003 Edition

DENIED: SEE COMMENTS BELOW

1. As per ANSI Section 606, Lavatories and Sinks shall be no higher than 2'-10" above the finished floor. As per Chapter 11, Section 1103.2.3, employee work area elements are exempt under proper conditions. A spot check of the various counter/sink elevations has shown some inconsistencies with this requirement. Reference detail J6/A-619, which is clearly a public accessed counter that is required to be accessible. Please review all newly installed sinks and lavs as to accessibility. Please note all lavs and sinks that are employee work area elements that are not subject to the 2'-10" accessibility height requirement.
2. As per The 2006 IBC, Section 1107.5.3, please provide a code analysis summary of the required "A" and "B" type units provided.
3. As per section 3409.7 please provide a summary of accessibility construction costs expended vs total construction budget.
4. The stepping stone pathway separation at the courtyards is not to exceed ½" as per ICC (ANSI) 117.1, Section 302.3.
5. Please provide accessible signage as required by ICC (ANSI) 117.1, Section 1110.

END OF REVIEW
11/10/2009 MARTIN BROWN FIRE REVIEW Approved

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
11/23/2009 CINDY AGUILAR OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
11/23/2009 SUE REEVES REJECT SHELF Completed