Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T09CM02784
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12/02/2009 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | The submitted heat loss calculations (213,316 BTUH) show that the proposed unit heater (250,000 BTUH input, 200,000 BTUH output) cannot maintain a 68 degree Fahrenheit temperature on a design day. However, the calculations also show that the building does not meet the envelope requirements for the 2006 IECC. Provide calculations to show that the building does meet the energy code requirements. |
| 12/02/2009 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 3. Comment not addressed. Revise the termination point of the water heater flue to comply with Section 510.6.2, UPC 2006 (i.e. at least 2 feet above any point on the roof within 10 feet of the flue). 4. Comment may not have been addressed; the drawing is too confusing to tell. Provide a vent downstream of the trap for the trench drain. Reference: Sections 901.0 and 910.1, UPC 2006. 5. Comment not addressed. Compare the waste and vent riser diagram on sheet A3 with the plumbing plan on sheet A1. Coordinate the size of the waste piping for the trench drain. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006 |
| 12/14/2009 | BETH GRANT | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Needs Review | |
| 12/14/2009 | DROBEY1 | WWM | REVIEW | Needs Review |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12/14/2009 | DELMA ROBEY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |