Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL-BLDG/FIRE/ZONING/ENG
Permit Number - T09CM02771
Review Name: COMMERCIAL-BLDG/FIRE/ZONING/ENG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/16/2009 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. SHEET 1; GENERAL NOTES: NOTE 3 SHOULD REFERENCE THE 2006 IBC. 2. SHEET 1; GENERAL NOTES: REFERENCE THE ICC/ANSI A117.1-2003 FOR ACCESSIBILITY. 3. SHEET 2; FOUNDATION NOTES: REMOVE NOTES NOT PERTINENT TO THIS PROJECT. 4. SHEET 2 (FOUNDATION NOTES); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS SHEET 2 (SOILS): CHANGE NOTE 6 ON PLAN SHEET 2 TO MEET THE CITY OF TUCSON AMENDMENTS TO THE 2006 IBC, SECTION 1805.2. THIS AMENDMENT REQUIRES THE FOOTING DEPTH TO BE 18" TO ACHIEVE 1500 PSF ALLOWABLE SOIL BEARING. PER THE CALCULATIONS AND PLANS, A 12" DEPTH IS INDICATED. IT APPEARS FROM THE DRAWINGS THAT THE FOOTINGS MEET THE 18" DEPTH. CLARIFY AND CHANGE THE CALCULATIONS AND DRAWINGS AS REQUIRED. 5. SHEET 3.1; GENERAL PLAN NOTES: THESE PLANS FALL UNDER THE 2006 IBC. REVISE NOTES 3, 5, 6, 7, AND 8 TO REFERENCE SPECIFIC IBC SECTIONS. 6. SHEET 3.1; HC BATH: PROVIDE WALL ELEVATIONS ON THE DRAWINGS INDICATING THE LENGTH AND LOCATION OF ALL GRAB BARS PER ICC/ANSI A117.1-2003, SECTIONS 604.10 AND 607. REMOVE ADA NOTE. 7. SHEET 3.1; FLOOR PLAN: PER THE IBC SECTION 708.1(2), WALLS SEPARATING SLEEPING UNITS IN AN R-1 OCCUPANCY MUST BE FIRE PARTITIONS WITH A FIRE RESISTANCE RATING PER SECTION 708.3. VERIFY AND PROVIDE INFORMATION ON THE DRAWINGS. 8. SHEET 3.1; FLOOR PLAN: PER THE IBC SECTION 708.4, THE FIRE PARTITIONS SHALL EXTEND FROM THE FOUNDATION TO THE UNDERSIDE OF THE ROOF SHEATHING, OR FIREBLOCKING/DRAFTSTOPPING IS REQUIRED. VERIFY AND PROVIDE INFORMATION ON THE DRAWINGS. 9. SHEET 3.1; FLOOR PLAN: PER THE IBC SECTION 903.2.7, GROUP R OCCUPANCIES REQUIRE AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEMS. VERIFY AND PROVIDE INFORMATION ON THE DRAWINGS. 10. SHEET 3.1; FLOOR PLAN: INDICATE ON THE PLAN THAT THE LAUNDRY AND STORAGE AREA IS HANDICAP ACCESSIBLE. PROVIDE WALL ELEVATIONS ON THE DRAWINGS INDICATING THAT THE LAUNDRY AND STORAGE AREA FOLLOWS ANSI SECTION 611. 11. SHEET 3.1; FLOOR PLAN: PROVIDE WALL ELEVATIONS ON THE DRAWINGS INDICATING THAT THE KITCHEN CABINETS AND APPLIANCES ARE HANDICAP ACCESSIBLE, FOLLOWING ANSI SECTION 1003.12. 12. SHEET 5; FRAMING NOTES: REVISE NOTE 6 TO REFERENCE THE IBC TABLES. 13. GENERAL: ADD A NOTE ON THE DRAWINGS INDICATING THERE IS ONE REQUIRED ACCESSIBLE UNIT (TYPE A) PER THE IBC TABLE 1107.6.1.1, AND ALL OTHER UNITS TO BE TYPE B PER THE IBC SECTION 1107.6.1.2. 14. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 11/16/2009 | ERIC NEWCOMB | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Denied | 1. SEE BUILDING COMMENTS. |
| 11/16/2009 | DAVE MANN | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | Fire Comments 1. The site plan for this project was approved only on the condition the buildings would have fire sprinklers. 2. The IRC cannot be used this project. |
| 11/16/2009 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. The 2006 International Mechanical Code with Local Amendments is the relevant code for this project. 2. Show how outside air is to be provided to bedrooms 1 and 6 and show what quantity of outside air is to be supplied to each of these bedrooms. Reference: Section 106.3.1, IMC 2006. 3. The minimum insulation for ducts located in indirectly conditioned spaces within the building envelope is R-4.2 (installed). Reference: Section 503.2.7, IECC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson. 4. Provide heating and cooling load calculations that justify the capacities of the heating and cooling equipment specified for the project. Reference: Section 503.2, IECC 2006. 5. Show how the indoor heat pump units are being connected to the building structure and provide calculations to show that the building structure is not being adversely affected. Reference: Section 302.1, IMC 2006. 6. Provide auxiliary drain pans or secondary drain systems for the indoor heat pump units. Reference: Section 307.2.3 IMC 2006. 7. Show the size, route, and termination of the dryer exhaust ducts. Reference: Sections 504.1, 504.2, and 504.4, IMC 2006. 8. Provide a Type I hood over all domestic cooking appliances used for commercial purposes. Reference: Section 507.2.3, IMC 2006. |
| 11/16/2009 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide a letter from Tucson Water confirming that the use of a 1" water meter will be allowed for this project (51 fixture units equates to a demand of 29 GPM). 2. Reduced pressure backflow prevention assemblies are required to be installed directly after the water meter for commercial buildings that have food service facilities. Reference: COT Ordinance 9976, http://www.tucsonaz.gov/water/docs/backflow-ord.pdf |
| 11/16/2009 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide waste and vent isometrics and water supply isometrics. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. 2. Clarify the design of the drainage piping for the shower. It appears that the shower vents through the waste line for the adjacent bathtub. Reference: Section 311.4, UPC 2006. 3. Provide combustion air openings for the water heaters. Reference: Section 507, UPC 2006. 4. Provide for sterilization of the domestic water piping per Section 609.9, UPC 2006. 5. Provide water pressure and water pipe sizing calculations. Include the pressure drop associated with the water treatment system in the calculations. Since PEX tubing has been specified, size the tubing per the manufacturer's sizing data with a maximum velocity of 8 feet per second. Reference: Section 610.1, UPC 2006. 6. Show a cleanout at the kitchen sink in detail 2/sheet 8. Reference: Section 707.4, UPC 2006. 7. Provide the listing for the two-way cleanout fitting called out on the plumbing plan. Reference: Sections 103.2.3 and 707.6, UPC 2006. 8. Provide the rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole and the first floor elevation. Determine the need for a backwater valve per Section 710.1, UPC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson. 9. Show the inverts and slope of the building sewer on the drawing. The slope of the building sewer shall be at least ΒΌ" per foot unless it is shown to be impractical due to the depth of the public sewer or structural conditions. Reference: Sections 103.2.3 and 718.1, UPC 2006. 10. Provide cleanouts in the building sewer at intervals not exceeding 100 feet. Reference: Section 719.1, UPC 2006. 11. Provide roof drainage calculations and plans. All roof areas shall be drained by roof drains, scuppers, or gutters. Reference: Section 1101.11.1, UPC 2006. 12. Revise the size of the gas pipe between the second and third water heaters; 404 CFH at 100' requires a 1-1/2" pipe. Reference: Section 1217.1, UPC 2006. 13. Provide specifications and details to show how the fire-rating will be preserved at the combustible piping penetrations of the fire-resistance-rated partitions (e.g. the piping shown in the fire partition between the bathtubs). Reference: Section 1505.0, UPC 2006. 14. Approval of the plans by the Pima County Health Department is required prior to approval of the kitchen plumbing. |
| 11/17/2009 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 11/19/2009 | RICHARD JIROUDEK | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Project: 5711 E Ft. Lowell Rd. T09CM02771 Project denied for the following: 1. The appropriate code for this project is the 2005 NEC. Load calculations should be based on using Hotel/Motel and commercial kitchen. NEC 220. 2. Need to provide on line diagram for electric service. Provide ratings, wire sizes and type, Fault current analysis, and AIC rating of equipment. 3. Provide IECC calculations. City of Tucson submittal requirements. 4. Need service receptacles for air conditioning equipment see NEC 210.63. 5. Need electric wiring plans for Type 1 hood required by mechanical code. 6. Receptacle locations to be per NEC 210.60. 7. Add 25% to load calculations for continous loads and largest motor load. 8. Provide Lighting fixture schedule and cut sheets per City of Tucson submittal requirements. Rich Jirooudek Electric plans examining 520-954-0161 |
| 12/04/2009 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: 1937 N. Corte El Rancho T09CM02771 Convert residence to Bed & Breakfast Residential Building Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: December 4, 2009 1. Zoning will not be able to approve this site plan until the Special Exception for the use has been approved. Once approved on the plan provides; Special Exception number, Date of Approval, Any Conditions of Approval. Additional comments may be forth coming once the conditions of approval are provided. 2. Clearly indicate the accessible route from both the parking area and from the street. Provide the max. cross slope (2%) and max. running slope (5%) for the sidewalk leading to the proposed porch. 3. Per LUC Table 3.3.7.I the minimum width of a two-way parking area access lane (PAAL) is 24. Revise the PAAL to meet this requirement. 4. Per D.S. 3-05.2.3.C.1 A vehicular use area must be provided with post barricades or wheel stop curbing designed to prevent parked vehicles from extending beyond the property lines; damaging adjacent landscaping, walls, or buildings; or overhanging adjacent sidewalk areas or unpaved areas on or off site and to prevent vehicles from driving onto unimproved portions of the site. This said some type of barrier is required along the entire length of the driveway, and any place that the wheel stops will not prevent a vehicle from leaving the paved area. 5. Per D.S. 3-05.2.2.D Back-Up Spur. A back-up spur will be provided at the end of a row of parking if no ingress or egress is provided at that end. The spur will be a minimum of three (3) feet in depth, will have a three (3) foot radii, and will have a wheel barrier to prevent encroachment onto any unsurfaced areas. A minimum distance of three (3) feet will be provided between the back of spur and any wall, screen, or other obstruction over six (6) inches in height. This said the backup spur does not meet the 3'-0" requirement to the "EXISTING OCOTILLO FENCE". 6. Please clarify why you are proposing "CHIP SEAL ON ASPHALT". 7. Per D.S. 2-09.0.4.1 Proximity to Main Entrances. Class 2 bicycle parking facilities will be located no more that 50 feet from the main building entrance. This said provide a dimension from the proposed bicycle parking to the main entrance. 8. Per D.S. 2-09.0.4.4 Class 2 bicycle parking facilities will be clearly visible from the adjacent sidewalks, drives and the main entrance. Provide a height for the proposed site wall along Corte El Rancho Merlita, it appears this wall may restrict visibility of the Class 2 bicycle parking. 9. Provide a Class 2 bicycle parking detail that meets the requirements of D.S. 2-08.5.0 If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 C:\planning\grading\t09cm02771.doc |
| 12/07/2009 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12/11/2009 | GERARDO BONILLA | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 12/11/2009 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |