Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T09CM02738
Parcel: 12308024C

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - TI ALL

Permit Number - T09CM02738
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - TI ALL
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
01/05/2010 ERIC NEWCOMB ZONING HC REVIEW Denied 1. SEE BUILDING COMMENTS.
01/05/2010 ERIC NEWCOMB BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. WITH THE OCCUPANCY LOAD THAT IS INDICATED ON SHEET TS1, PROVIDE THE JUSTIFICATION FOR THE NUMBER OF RESTROOMS PROVIDED, USING IBC TABLE 2902.1.
2. SHEET A1.0 HAS SECTION CUT REFERENCES TO SHEETS A.1 AND A1.2. THERE IS NO SHEET A.1, AND NO SECTIONS ON SHEET A1.2. CLARIFY.
01/06/2010 RAY MAJUTA ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Approved
01/11/2010 DAVE MANN FIRE REVIEW Denied Fire comments:

The new requirements are due to the area and occupant load increasing to over 100 occupants, fire sprinklers will be required. Refer to 2006 IFC, table 1004.1.1 for occupant loads, section 903.2.1.2 for sprinkler requirements. Additionally, allowable distance from existing fire hydrants is exceeded. Fire Department will accept fire sprinklers in lieu of new hydrant. Please show location and size of fire sprinkler supply line.Be advised that if kitchen cooking appliances locations have, or are going to be changed, kitchen exhaust hood fire suppression system may need to be revised.
01/13/2010 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Denied DSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: 2945 E. Speedway
T09CM02738
Building Plan (2nd Review)

TRANSMITTAL DATE: January 13, 2010

1. The building plans have been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed.

2. Zoning can not approve the building plan until the site plan is approved by all PDSD agencies.

3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved and stamped site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956

C:\planning\grading\t09cm02738.doc

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED:
01/14/2010 BIANCA RAMIREZ ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied Unable to appove site plan at this time. Building plan can be approved once all site plan comments have been addressed.
01/21/2010 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Comment not resolved. Provide the installed weight of the relocated rooftop unit. Reference: Section 106.3.1, IMC 2006.
2. Comment not addressed. Provide structural calculations to verify that the existing roof is capable of supporting the additional dead load due to the installation of the new roof top unit and the relocated rooftop unit. Reference: Section 302.1, IMC 2006.
3. Comment not resolved. Show that the exhaust outlets for the new rooftop unit (RTU-3 or Unit #4?) are 10' or greater from. Reference: Section 106.3.1, IMC 2006.
4. Comment not resolved. Show the size, routing, and termination of the condensate drains. Reference: Section 307.2, IMC 2006 and Section 814.0, UPC 2006.
5. Comment not resolved. Clarify the ductwork design shown on sheet M.1. The drawing appears to show flex ducts located above the roof for rooftop unit #1; if so, how are they to be afforded weather protection? The duct design for the new rooftop unit is not legible. Reference: Sections 106.3.1, 403.3.4, and 603.16, IMC 2006.
6. Clarify the name and specifications for the new rooftop unit: is it RTU-3 or Unit #4? On sheet M1.0 it is a heat pump, model PHD36000K00C by an unknown manufacturer, but on sheet M2, it is a Carrier model 48TCDA06 air conditioner with gas heat.
7. The occupant load used to calculate the required ventilation is not necessarily the same as the occupant load used for calculating exiting requirements. The occupant load used for calculating the minimum required ventilation is to be based on Table 403.3, IMC 2003 or an approved engineering analysis of the specific occupancy type. Reference: Section 403.3, IMC 2006.
8. Revise the ventilation calculations to include rooftop unit #2 (the "2.5- ton unit"). Reference: Sections 106.3.1, 403.3, and 403.3.2, IMC 2006.
01/21/2010 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Denied 1. Comment not addressed. Show the location of the reduced pressure backflow assembly on the drawings; indicate the size of the assembly. Reference: City of Tucson Ordinance 9976, Backflow Prevention and Cross-connection Control.
2. Comment not addressed. Provide the size of the existing water meter and the total connected water demand that will result from the addition of this activity. Reference: Sections 610.1 and 610.2, UPC 2006.
01/22/2010 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Comment not resolved. Coordinate the gas piping design with the kitchen design to include the actual equipment being installed with the correct gas loads. Include "existing rooftop unit #2" if it uses gas heat. Complete the natural gas piping design, to include the pipe sizes, loads and developed lengths of the piping. Reference: Sections 103.2.3 and 1217.0, UPC 2006.
2. Comment not resolved. Provide fixture descriptions for all plumbing fixtures including those being provided by others. All plumbing fixtures and fittings shall be listed or labeled by a nationally-recognized, accredited conformity assessment company (e.g. UL, ETL, UPC, etc). Reference: Sections 301.1.1 and 401.1, UPC 2006.
3. The use of PEX as an alternate material for water piping will require a revision to the activity, including pipe sizing calculations. Reference: Sections 103.2.3 and 610.1, UPC 2006.
4. Revise the detail of the water heater installation to correspond to the type of water heater specified. Include the flue size, flue height, and show the flue termination. Reference: Sections 103.2.3, 605.5, 608.3, and 608.7 UPC 2006.
5. Comment not addressed; provide a riser diagram for the water piping. Show how the new water piping relates to the existing water supply system and show that the additional connections do not cause the existing piping to be overloaded. Reference: Section 101.5.1, UPC 2006.
6. Comment not resolved; show the sizes of the existing drain piping. Show how the new drain and vent piping relates to the existing drainage system and show that the additional connections do not cause the existing system to be overloaded. Reference: Section 101.5.1, UPC 2006.
7. Comment not resolved. The calculations for the gravity grease interceptor do not meet the minimum size criteria per Section 1014.3.6, UPC 2006 and the size and type of the existing grease interceptor is not noted.
8. Comment not addressed. Provide roof drainage calculations and plans. All roof areas shall be drained by roof drains, scuppers, or gutters. Show also, how the drainage for the existing roof is being affected by the new roofs. Reference: Section 1101.11.1, UPC 2006.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
02/04/2010 CINDY AGUILAR OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
02/04/2010 SUE REEVES REJECT SHELF Completed