Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: REVISION - SITE
Permit Number - T09CM02738
Review Name: REVISION - SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/06/2010 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | Area and occupant load has increased to over 100 occupants, fire sprinklers will be required. Refer to 2006 IFC, table 1004.1.1 for occupant loads, section 903.2.1.2 for sprinkler requirements. Additionally, allowable distance from existing fire hydrants is exceeded. Fire Department will accept fire sprinklers in lieu of new hydrant. Please show location and size of fire sprinkler supply line.Be advised that if kitchen cooking appliances locations have, or are going to be changed, kitchen exhaust hood fire suppression system may need to be revised. |
| 01/08/2010 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Denied | SPECIAL NOTE: The written respose comments are not revelant to the review comments for Zoning H/C. I belive they are in response to the building comments. Please provide comments related directly to the Zoning H/C Review Comments. The previous review comments still stand as the drawings show no revision in reponse: 1. Provide a large scale detail of the accessible parking plan showing compliance with ICC (ANSI), Section 502, including slopes, signage, ramps, aisles, all dimensions required and "Van Accessible" space identification. 2. Provide an accessible route connection to the public right of way, pedestrian way. 3. Provide a continous accessible route to the required rear fire exit of the building. END OF REVIEW |
| 01/08/2010 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | The site plan and landscape plan must show identical site layout to avoid conflict between the two plans. Ensure that all changes to the site plan are reflected on the landscape plan. Submit a revised landscape plan to verify that the site meets minimum requirements. The previous approved site / landscape plan was based on a plan from 1975, duplicate the landscape indicated on the plan dated 10/14/07 with proposed site changes on a new submitted document. |
| 01/13/2010 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | 5DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: May's Counter Restaurant T09CM02738 Site Plan (2nd Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: January 13, 2010 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. This site plan was reviewed for compliance with the City of Tucson Development Standards (D.S.) and Land Use Code (LUC) for full code compliance for the areas of expansion and revision to the last approved site plan. 2. This comment was not addressed. This is a requirement for a commercial site plan and is not based on percent of expansion. The address is not the legal description. The following is the legal description "BLENMAN LOTS 13 14 & E2 LOT 12 & W2 LOT 15 EXC S12' THEREOF BLK 2" D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.2 Provide a legal description on the site plan. 3. This comment was not addressed. This is a requirement for a commercial site plan and is not based on percent of expansion. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.4 Provide a location map that meets the requirement of D.S. 2-05.2.1.D on the site plan. 4. This comment was not addressed. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.5 Provide lot bearings on the site plan. 5. This comment was not addressed. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.7 Provide perimeter yard setback dimensions from all proposed structures, covered porches, to the interior lot lines. 6. This comment was not addressed. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.7 Provide a street perimeter yard setback dimension from the proposed covered porch addition to the street. Per LUC Section 3.2.6.5.B & LUC Table 3.2.6.I, ADT of 1,000 or greater, the street perimeter yard setback dimension is measured from the back of existing curb or future curb location. As it does not appear that the curb along Speedway Blvd. is at full width show the future curb and provide the perimeter yard setback dimension. 7. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.7 Provide a setback dimension from the beer cooler enclosure to the north property line. Based on the C-1 Zoning Development Designator "28", Perimeter Yard Indicator "DD", the required. perimeter yard setback from the proposed "SHED COVERING STRUCTURE OVER BEER COOLER" to the north property line is 1-1/2 times the height of the structure. Based on a building wall height of 8'-10" the required perimeter yard setback is 12.8 feet. See LUC Section 3.2.6.3 for Perimeter Yard Measurement. A Design Development Option (DDO) will need to be processed and approved prior to approval of the site plan if the 8'-0" perimeter yard setback is to remain as shown on the site plan. 8. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.8 Provide a fully dimensioned off-street parking layout. 9. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.8 The wheel stop dimension shown on the plan is not correct. See Development Standards 3-05.2.3.C.2 and Figure 5 for correct location. 10. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.8 Per LUC Section 3.3.7.2.A the minimum length of eighteen (18) feet is required for a vehicle parking space. The parking spaces shown along the south side of the building are only 17'-6" in length. A Board of Adjustment for Variance is required for the proposed 17-6" vehicle parking spaces. 11. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 There appears to be a 6'-6" dimension shown for the sidewalk along the south side of the proposed covered porch. This sidewalk scales out at less than 4'-0". Provide a correct dimension for this sidewalk. Per Development Standards 2-08.5.1.A the minimum width of a sidewalk is four (4) feet. Once a true dimension is provided a Development Standard Modification Request maybe required to reduce the sidewalk width to less than four (4) feet but not less than three (3) feet. 12. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.Based on dimensions shown on the plan for the vehicle parking spaces and parking area access lane (PAAL) shown along the south side of the building it appears that once the vehicle parking spaces area shown correctly the PAAL will not meet the minimum twenty-four (24) feet width. See Land Use Code Section 3.3.7.2 for minimum width of a two-way PAAL. 13. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 Provide a dimension from the north end of the proposed accessible ramp to the north side of the sidewalk so that Development Standards section 2-08.5.1.A requirements can be verified. 14. This comment was not addressed. This is a requirement for a commercial site plan and is not based on percent of expansion. Show any existing or proposed free standing signage on the plan. Based on the current aerial photos there appears to be a sign located near the southeast corner of the site. If this sign is to remain it appears to encroach into the proposed vehicle use area. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.13 If applicable show the location, type, size, and height of existing and proposed signage on the plan. 15. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.14 Per LUC Section 3.4.3.4 Use of Loading Area. A loading space shall be used only for the purpose it is intended and shall not be used for the repair or dismantling of vehicles or in any other manner that would interfere with the purpose for which the space is provided, this said the loading space may not be used for access to the refuse container location. 16. This comment was not addressed. This is a requirement for a commercial site plan and is not based on percent of expansion. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.28 Show the existing zoning of parcel and adjacent parcels, including those across streets and alleys. 17. This comment was not addressed. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.28 The "SITE ZONING" listed under "SITE DATA" is not correct. The zoning for this parcel is C-1. 18. This comment was not addressed. This is a requirement for a commercial site plan and is not based on percent of expansion. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.31 Show the existing and proposed use on the site plan. The proposed use should be listed as "FOOD SERVICE "28", SUBJECT TO: SEC. 3.5.4.6.A AND .C" 19. This comment was not addressed. This is a requirement for a commercial site plan and is not based on percent of expansion. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.3 Provide a floor area ratio per LUC Section 3.2.11 on the site plan. 20. This comment was not addressed. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.6 Provide an expansion calculation on the plan. The expansion includes all outdoor seating, waiting area and beer cooler. 21. Depending on how the above comments are addressed addition comments may be forth coming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956. C:\planning\site\t09cm02738 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and additional requested documents. DSD Zoning Review Transmittal TO: Planning and Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Mays Counter Restaurant T09CM02738 2945 E. Speedway Blvd. TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 2, 2010 COMMENTS: Site Plan OK D.D.O. required for: Per LUC Section 3.2.6.4, C-1 Zone, Food Service, subject to: Sec. 3.5.4.6.A and .C, Development Designator "28", Perimeter Yard Indicator "DD" the required perimeter yard setback is 1-1/2 the height of the exterior wall. Exterior wall height 8'-0" therefore the required perimeter yard setback from the proposed shed covering the new beer cooler to the north property line is 12'-0", proposed setback, 7'-0". If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 |
| 01/14/2010 | BIANCA RAMIREZ | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Bianca Ramirez, CFM, Engineering Associate PROJECT: May's Counter Restaurant T09CM02738-R Site Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: January 14, 2010 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and a response letter, which states how all Engineering coments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards have been addressed. 1. Please provide property description on site plan. 2. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.5 Provide lot bearings on the site plan. 3. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.8 Provide a fully dimensioned off-street parking layout. 4. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.8 Provide correct wheel stop dimensions. 5. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.8 Priovide parking spaces that meet minimum length requirement of eighteen (18) feet. 6. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 There appears to be a 6'-6" dimension shown for the sidewalk along the south side of the proposed covered porch. This sidewalk scales out at less than 4'-0". Provide a correct dimension for this sidewalk. Per Development Standards 2-08.5.1.A the minimum width of a sidewalk is four (4) feet. Once a true dimension is provided a Development Standard Modification Request maybe required to reduce the sidewalk width to less than four (4) feet but not less than three (3) feet. 7. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A. Based on dimensions shown on the plan for the vehicle parking spaces and parking area access lane (PAAL) shown along the south side of the building it appears that once the vehicle parking spaces area shown correctly the PAAL will not meet the minimum twenty-four (24) feet width. 8. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.14 A loading space shall be used only for the sole purpose of loading and unloading. Please relocate refuse container location or revise location of loading zone so that they are seperate. 9. Additional comments may be forth coming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Bianca.Ramirez@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4928. |
| 01/20/2010 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Comment not addressed. Revise the site drawing to include the following information: a. the location and size of the water meter b. the location of the main water lines and fire hydrants c. the location and size of the public sanitary sewer and d. the location, invert, and rim elevation of all manholes and cleanouts. Reference: City of Tucson Development Standard No. 2-05.0 2.3 and Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 02/04/2010 | CINDY AGUILAR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 02/04/2010 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |