Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T09CM02738
Parcel: 12308024C

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL TI

Permit Number - T09CM02738
Review Name: COMMERCIAL TI
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
01/04/2010 GERRY KOZIOL WWM REVIEW Approved
12/07/2009 DAVE MANN FIRE REVIEW Denied Please revise code review information to include actual number of occupants. If load has increased to over 100 occupants, fire sprinklers will be required. Also, please review the swing of the exit gate from the covered patio, It appears to swing in the wrong direction. Be advised that if kitchen cooking appliances locations have, or are going to be changed, kitchen exhaust hood fire suppression system may need to be revised.
12/11/2009 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Denied DSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: 2945 E. Speedway
T09CM02738
Building Plan (1st Review)

TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 26, 2009

1. The building plans have been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed.

2. The building foot print does not match what is shown on the approved site plan. Revise the site or building plan so that they match.

3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved and stamped site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956

C:\planning\grading\t09cm02738.doc

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED:
12/11/2009 RONALD BROWN BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Please provide structural caluations for new patio addition and covered equipment area.
a. Please provide structural calculations for the new roof top mounted HVAC equipment.
2. Provide an accurate occupancy load summary and count as allowed by section 1004.
a. A preliminary cout shows that toilet fixture quantities atre not sufficient. Please provide an accurate summary for required toilet fixtures as per Section 29 and the plumbing code.
3. The Lounge Area is not accessible. Please provide a ramp for access.
4. Please provide latest approved site plan.
END OF REVIEW
12/11/2009 RONALD BROWN ZONING HC REVIEW Denied 1. New raised seating platform makes accessible exiting non-compliant. Please remove raised areas at rear exit or provide another exit that is accessible.
2. The Lounge Area is not accessible. Please provide a ramp for access as per Section 1108.
3. Please provide an accessible booth as per Section 1108.
12/21/2009 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Specify the minimum resistance (R-value) of the duct insulation to be used on this project. Reference: Section 503.2.7, IECC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson.
2. Provide the installed weight of the rooftop equipment. Reference: Section 106.3.1, IMC 2006.
3. Clarify the heating capacity of the existing and the new rooftop units; the heating capacities on sheet M.1 and P.1 do not agree. Reference: Section 106.3.1, IMC 2006.
4. Provide structural calculations to verify that the existing roof is capable of supporting the additional dead load due to the installation of the roof top unit. Reference: Section 302.1, IMC 2006.
5. Show the location of the existing and new roof top units and show that their air intakes are 10' or greater from air inlets. Reference: Section 106.3.1, IMC 2006.
6. Show the size, routing, and termination of the condensate drain. Reference: Section 307.2, IMC 2006 and Section 814.0, UPC 2006.
7. Show the balancing information for the existing units and for the new unit and clarify the ductwork design shown on sheet M.1 (i.e. is the ductwork shown for one unit or two units?). Reference: Sections 106.3.1 and 403.3.4, IMC 2006.
8. Show that the air balancing information for the kitchen complies with the requirements of footnote f, Table 403.3, IMC 2006.
9. Revise the ventilation calculations to take into account the different air conditioning units serving different occupancy loads in the project space. Include calculations to show that the common ventilation systems are sized in accordance with Section 403.3.2, IMC 2006. Reference: Sections 403.3 and 403.3.2, IMC 2006.
12/21/2009 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Complete the natural gas piping design, to include the pipe sizes, loads and developed lengths of the piping. Reference: Sections 103.2.3 and 1217.0, UPC 2006.
2. Approval of the kitchen plans by the Pima County Health Department is required prior to approval from the City of Tucson.
3. Drawings provided by the kitchen equipment suppliers are typically un-sealed shop drawings and are not a substitute for sealed design drawings. Provide design drawings for the kitchen plumbing. Reference: Sections 103.2.2 and 103.2.3, UPC 2006.
4. Provide fixture descriptions for all plumbing fixtures. All plumbing fixtures and fittings shall be listed or labeled by a nationally-recognized, accredited conformity assessment company (e.g. UL, ETL, UPC, etc). Reference: Sections 301.1.1 and 401.1, UPC 2006.
5. Indicate the materials to be used in the proposed plumbing systems for this activity. Reference: Sections 103.2.3, 301.1, 604.0, 701.0, 903.0, 1102.0, and 129.5, UPC 2006.
6. Provide a detail of the water heater installation, including the valves, flue size, flue height, and flue termination. Reference: Sections 103.2.3, 605.5, 608.3, and 608.7 UPC 2006.
7. Show how the exterior water piping is to be protected from freezing. Reference: Section 313.6, UPC 2006.
8. Appliances (e.g. coffee brewers, dishwashers, ice makers, etc) to be directly connected to the water supply system that do not have listed, integral backflow preventers or integral air gaps conforming to Table 6-3, UPC 2006 require backflow prevention. Reference: Sections 602.3, 603.0, and Table 6-2, UPC 2006.
9. Show how the new water piping relates to the existing water supply system and show that the additional connections do not cause the existing piping to be overloaded. Reference: Section 101.5.1, UPC 2006.
10. Show how the new drain and vent piping relates to the existing drainage system and show that the additional connections do not cause the existing system to be overloaded. Reference: Section 101.5.1, UPC 2006.
11. Indicate the type and capacity of the existing grease interceptor; show that it is capable of handling the connected load.
12. Provide roof drainage calculations and plans. All roof areas shall be drained by roof drains, scuppers, or gutters. Show also, how the drainage for the existing roof is being affected by the new roofs. Reference: Section 1101.11.1, UPC 2006.
12/21/2009 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Denied 1. Show the location of the reduced pressure backflow assembly on the drawings; indicate the size of the assembly. Reference: City of Tucson Ordinance 9976, Backflow Prevention and Cross-connection Control.
2. Provide the size of the existing water meter and the total connected water demand that will result from the addition of this activity. Reference: Sections 610.1 and 610.2, UPC 2006.
12/30/2009 RAY MAJUTA ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied Project: 2945 E speedway Bl.
T09CM02738
TI Restaurant

The electrical plans have been denied for the following:

1. Sheet E-2, circuit B-26 on plan should be circuit B-28.
2. The calculated load for the fixtures on this circuit ( B-28) appear to be approx 976 va, at 125% for continous duty would equal 1220 va. The panel schedule shows 1083 va. Has the continuous duty % been added for lighting?
3. Circuit B-30 on the lighting plan shows 7- G fixtures which should be 700 va at 125%= 875 va. The panel schedule shows 400 va and the Fire Suppression circuit is on B-30 also ?
4. Power Plan shows circuit B-8,12 this should be 8,10 ?

Please correct and resubmit.

Ray T Majuta
Elect Pln Ck, PSDS, City of Tucson
1/03/10
Ray.Majuta@tucsonaz.gov

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
01/05/2010 CINDY AGUILAR OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
01/05/2010 SUE REEVES REJECT SHELF Completed