Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - T09CM02678
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/07/2009 | DAVE MANN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/08/2009 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/08/2009 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/19/2009 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: T09CM02678 4082 e 22nd St. (Goodwill Store) Site Plan Review TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 19, 2009 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Based on the partial site plan drawing, the PAAL is narrowed to less than 24 feet next to the electrical box and the parking spaces opposite of the box. In review of the Aerials dated 2002 and 2005 it appears that the box was added sometime between those dates. In order to approve the partial site plan a variance would be required to reduce the PAAL width from 24 feet to 21'-7 3/8" even if the reduction only two spaces. It appears that there is sufficient width in the PAAL just south of the affected area where the restriping of the parking can be done and thereby allowing the restriping of the affected PAAL area to accommodate a 24 foot PAAL. 2. Label the PAAL widths adjacent to the west of the (Goodwill) building. Label the parking spaces typical length, width, and angle. 3. Revise the tenant roll to include all uses even if vacant call them retail. By all uses, I would like to see what the actual use in that specific suite is, i.e., Realty Office, Podiatrist office, Food Service, Furniture rental/sales, personal service such as barber or beauty salon etc. 4. The survey drawing does not have any DSD approval stamps or signatures. Provide a copy of the most current and approved site plan for reference to compare the overall building square footage. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. C:\planning\cdrc\DSD\T09CM02678.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and additional requested documents |
| 10/29/2009 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | October 29, 2009 T09CM02678 Site Plan review This site plan cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following comment: 1. Provide dimensions for all PAALs in the area impacted by this development. All two-way PAALs must be at 24 feet wide. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11/03/2009 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |