Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - T09CM02651
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/02/2009 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/02/2009 | RBROWN1 | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | Not a COT owned/operated property |
| 10/05/2009 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | Within a vehicular use area, one (1) canopy tree is required for each 10 motor vehicle parking spaces and every parking space shall be located within forty (40) feet of the trunk of a canopy tree (as measured from the center of the tree trunk) per LUC 3.7.2.3.A.1. Additional trees are required. |
| 10/05/2009 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Need pedestrian connection to rest of shopping center. Reference Zoning comments. 2. The one accessible parking space is remotely located from the center of the customer service area. Please relocate adjacent to the waiting/concessions building. 3. At detail 2/0.5: a. The sidewalk ramps in front of the accessible aisle need to be 6' long for a 6" high curb elevation. b. The flared ramp sides are drawn in the wrong direction. 4. At sheet 0.3, Note 4: Change the ADAAG reference to 2006 IBC, ICC (ANSI) 117.2, Sectionms 406.12 and 406.14. 5. At sheet 0.3, Note 14: Change pedestrian access lane to "Marked Crossing". END OF REVIEW |
| 10/05/2009 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/06/2009 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: October 7, 2009 SUBJECT: 6301 E 22nd Street- Engineering Review TO: Robert Page LOCATION: T14S R15E Sec18 Ward 4 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: T09CM02651 (Site Plan) and T09BU01488 (Grading Plan) SUMMARY: Engineering Division of the Planning and Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed site plan (T09CM02651), grading plan (T09BU01488), and Storm Drainage Statement (Oracle Engineering Group, Inc., 01OCT09) for the above referenced property. Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the site plan or grading plan at this time. The following items need to be addressed: STORM DRAINAGE STATEMENT COMMENTS: 1) Revise the Storm Drainage Statement (Statement) to label and detail all proposed drainage improvements. Specifically the proposed rock riprap pads adjacent to the depressed curb openings. In addition to the rock sizing and thickness provide filter fabric call out with specifications, the proposed slope, length and width dimensions of the pad, etc for construction purposes. 2) The property in located within a Shaded Zone X 100-year floodplain per the FIRM panel # 2253K, therefore is subject to the rules and regulations found in Chapter 26 of the Tucson Code. A Floodplain Use Permit will be required prior to grading plan approval and all notes and discussions must accurately reflect the flood zone determination. Elevation Certificates and inspections will be placed on the building permit applications for FFE requirements. 3) Revise or clarify the Statement with the Flood Hazard Notes on Sheet 0.1. Per Note #4, 5, and 6 the finished floor elevation of the proposed buildings must be elevated 1-foot above the calculated water surface elevation. Clarify in the Statement the WSEL and FFE requirements specifically addressing each elevation for both structures in order to complete the elevation certificate forms. Two elevation certificates (pre-slab inspection and final building inspection) are required for both buildings. SITE PLAN COMMENTS: 4) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.8: Revise the site plan to show a minimum unobstructed radius of 5 feet at all PAAL intersections, unless the PAAL is designated as a fire lane or access for refuse collection then a minimum unobstructed radius of 18 feet is required per DS Sec.3-05.2.1.3.b. Specifically the PAAL intersection with the existing parking area associated with Pizza Hut. 5) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.11: Verify and label the 25-feet radii for both sides of the proposed driveway per City of Tucson Transportation Access Management Guidelines (TAMG), Section 5.5. Refer to DS Sec.3-01.3.2.C for street development standards. Standard driveway entrance design or reduced radii for curb returns will require prior written approval from TDOT Permits and Codes, contact Thad Harvison at 837-6592. Verify that the site plan sheets (Horizontal Control Sheet) and civil sheets match. Currently the Horizontal Control Sheet calls out a 15-foot radius for the west side of the proposed drive. 6) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.12: Revise the site plan to show the required 6-foot wide sidewalk with curbing along street frontages, Wilmot Road and 22nd Street. Per the adopted Mayor and Counsel policy all sidewalks along MS&R right-of-ways for arterial and collector streets require 6-foot wide sidewalks. Verify that the existing sidewalk meets the minimum requirements or provide an approved Development Standard Modification Request showing approval for the reduction in width. 7) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.12: Revise the site plan sheets and civil sheets to correctly label the required 5-foot pedestrian access adjacent to the PAAL and the north side of the proposed waiting/vending building. Per DS Sec.3-05.2.2.B.1 a pedestrian circulation must provide a clear 4-foot minimum width unless adjacent to a PAAL which would require a 5-foot width. 8) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.12: Revise the site plan to label all offsite handicap access ramps within the public right-of-way of both streets to be designed per the required Standard Detail for Public Improvement #207. Provide details and minimum slope requirements at all transitions from pedestrian circulation to vehicular circulation. 9) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.12: Refer to comments from Ron Brown, RA Structural Plans Examiner for all onsite handicap and ANSI Standard requirements that apply to this project. 10) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.15: Revise the Survey Note on Sheet 0.1 of the site plan. The Survey Note should state that the property is within a FEMA Shaded Zone X 100-year floodplain (not the 500-year as stated). 11) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.15: Revise the Flood Hazard Note # 3 on Sheet 0.1 of the site plan. The Note should state that the property is within a FEMA Shaded Zone X 100-year floodplain. Verification of FFE elevations must be provided within the revised Storm Drainage Statement. 12) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.16: Provide the Improvement Plan reference number for all existing drainage infrastructure adjacent to the site; i.e. catch basins, storm drains, grates, etc. All existing drainage improvements that are shown on the site plan must have the referenced improvement plan for site verification. 13) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.16: Revise Keynote #50 on Sheet 0.3 to correctly label the scupper height as 6-inches or 0.5 feet per the proposed Storm Drainage Statement. 14) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.20: Verify that all existing and proposed easements are drawn with recordation information, location, width, and purpose of on the site plan. Specifically the Permanent Service DR Easement per Book 9859, Page 1735 as shown on the subdivision plat map. 15) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.21: Provide dimensions from the street monument lines to the existing curb, sidewalk, driveways and utility lines for both Wilmot Road and 22nd Street. 16) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.32: Revise Keynote #33 on Sheet 0.3 to reference the correct detail for refuse construction. The Keynote should reference Detail 12 Sheet 0.5. 17) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.C: Revise the drainage arrows that are shown on the Landscape Plan to accurately show depressed curb locations and flow patterns to verify drainage into the proposed landscaping per the civil sheets. 18) Review and approval from TDOT Permits and Codes for all improvements within the public right-of-way will be required. A right-of-way use permit application will be required prior to construction. Refer to the following links for TDOT Forms and applications: a) http://www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd/Forms_Fees___Maps/Applications/applications.html / b) http://www.dot.ci.tucson.az.us/engineering/pia.php c) Or contact Thad Harvison at 837-6592 for all additional questions regarding r-o-w. 19) Be advised that further comments may be forth coming on resubmittal of the site plan. GRADING PLAN: 20) Provide a copy of the stamped approved site plan (T09CM02651). The grading plan can not be approved until verification that all details, locations, dimensions, and plan profiles match the approved site plan. Verify all information associated with the site plan is shown on the grading plan which will be used as the construction document. 21) Revise the civil sheet, keynote and Detail 4 to provide a specific construction detail for the proposed rock riprap pads at all depressed curb locations. In addition to the rock sizing and thickness provide filter fabric call out with specifications, the proposed slope, length and width dimensions of the pad, etc for construction purposes. 22) Provide additional spot elevation at the exit to the Car Wash Tunnel to verify that the majority of storm water runoff drains into the proposed depressed curb and landscape area and not through the PAAL. 23) Provide clarification for the two grates proposed at the Car Wash Tunnel's entrance and exit, verify they are connected to the mud/grease interceptor. Provide call out for pipe size, type and slope along with the required clean outs at junctions or angles greater than 10 degrees. 24) Provide the Improvement Plan reference number for all existing drainage infrastructure adjacent to the site; catch basins, storm drains, grates, etc. All existing drainage improvements that are shown on the grading plan must have the referenced improvement plan for site verification. 25) Revise Keynote #33 on Sheet G-1 to reference the correct detail for refuse construction. The Keynote should reference Detail 12 Sheet 0.5. 26) Provide the following note on the grading plan to read; "A floodplain use permit is required for all work proposed within the limits of the mapped FEMA Shaded Zone X 100-year floodplain as shown on the grading plan. Elevation Certificates will be required for all buildings to verify Finished Floor Elevations." Provide a Floodplain Use Permit application with the resubmittal of the grading plan for review and approval prior to grading plan approval. 27) Provide a General Note on Sheet G-1 to state; "All landscaping to be depressed minimum 6-inches for stormwater harvesting. Refer to the Water Harvesting Guidance Manual Ordinance # 10210 dated October 25 for further recommendations for stormwater harvesting." 28) Provide a General Note on Sheet G-1 to state; "Call for a Pre-construction meeting prior to start of earthwork. To schedule a DSD Pre-construction meeting, SWPPP inspection or general Engineering Inspections, call IVR (740-6970), or schedule with a Customer Service Representative at the Development Services Department, or contact DSD Engineering at 791-5550 extension 2101, or schedule inspections online at: http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/Online_Services/Online_Permits/online_permits.html 29) Please ensure that the grading plan is consistent with the site plan and Storm Drainage Report. Grading standards may be accessed at: http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/DevStandsTOC.pdf. STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN: A Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan was not submitted for review. 30) Per the proposed civil sheets the site disturbance is greater than 1 acre therefore a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) is required. The SWPPP must meet the minimum requirements of the AzPDES Construction General Permit (CGP). 31) Per City of Tucson Code Ordinance 10209, Chapter 26 Section 26-42.2: "For land disturbing activities that fall under the jurisdiction of this Article, a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan must be prepared and certified by an engineer, or a landscape architect and submitted along with the application for a grading permit to the City of Tucson Development Services Department." The SWPPP report and exhibits must be signed and sealed by the engineer of record or by a Registered Landscape Architect. GENERAL COMMENTS: Please provide a revised Storm Drainage Statement, site plan, grading plan, Floodplain User Permit application, and SWPPP that addresses the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. Enclose "redlines" with the resubmittal package. Further comments may be generated upon resubmittal of the site plan and grading plan review. For questions, or to schedule an appointment, I can be reached at 837-4929. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division COT Development Services |
| 10/09/2009 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide cleanouts in the building sewer at intervals not exceeding 100 feet. Reference: Section 719.1, UPC 2006. 2. Any fitting or connection in a drainage system that results in a reduction of the pipe area is prohibited. (A 6" ABS building drain, flowing half full at a slope of 1.5%, and an 8" ABS building drain, flowing half full at aslope of 1%, will convey approximately 785 GPM. A 4" ABS drain, flowing full at a slope of 1% can only handle about 85 GPM.) Reference: Section 316.4.1, UPC 2006. 3. Provide a vent for each interceptor. Reference: Section 1009.4, UPC 2006. |
| 10/13/2009 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Terry Stevens Lead Planner PROJECT: T09CM02651 6301 E. 22nd St. Site Plan TRANSMITTAL DATE: 10-14-09 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. DS 2-02.2.1.A.10 Provide the location of future sight visibility triangles. 2. DS 2-02.2.1.A.11 Provide width of the PAAL east of the proposed building. A 5' pedestrian refuge area is required along the north side of the waiting/vending building between the PAAL and the building. 3. DS 2-02.2.1.A.12 The pedestrian circulation path (sidewalk) along the north side of the carwash building is limited to less than the required minimum width of 4 feet, appears to be 3.1' at the "bump out portions" of the building. Revise. 4. The required vertical clearance over a handicap parking space is 98". Clearly indicate compliance with shade structure over the handicap parking space. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 837-4961 C:\planning\cdrc\DSD\T09CM02651.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and additional requested documents |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11/04/2009 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 11/04/2009 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |