Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL NEW
Permit Number - T09CM02361
Review Name: COMMERCIAL NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/23/2009 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | Smoke detectors required in apartments - not shown on plans |
| 09/23/2009 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. SEE PROJECT T09CM02359 BUILDING COMMENTS. |
| 09/29/2009 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide energy code compliance calculations for the building envelope (Pima County < 4,000 feet). Provide sufficient detail on the drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the building envelope. The information shall, as a minimum, include U-factors of the envelope systems and fenestration components, along with the R-values of the insulation and the SHGC for the fenestration. Reference: Sections 101.4 and 104.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2006. 2. Provide the manufacturer's equipment data, electrical operating information, and installed weight for EF-11, FC-11, FC-12, HP-11, and HP-12. Reference: Section 106.3.1, IMC 2006. 3. Show how fan coil FC-11 is being connected to the building structure and provide calculations to show that the building structure is not being adversely affected. Reference: Section 302.1, IMC 2006. 4. Provide calculations demonstrating adequate ventilation for the community building. Reference: Section 401.2, IMC 2006. 5. Clarify location of the exhaust termination for EF-11 with regard to the building openings. Reference: Section 501.2.1 (3), IMC 2006. |
| 09/30/2009 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | 09/30/2009 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section Terry Stevens Lead Planner Comments: 1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning could not verify that the building plan was in compliance with the approved site plan. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped site, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next building plan submittal. 3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. |
| 09/30/2009 | BETH GRANT | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Approved | |
| 09/30/2009 | ERIC NEWCOMB | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Denied | 1. SEE PROJECT T09CM02359 BUILDING COMMENTS. |
| 10/01/2009 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received the building plan for the above referenced property. Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the building plan application at this time. The following items need to be addressed: BUILDING PLAN COMMENTS: 1) Engineering could not verify that the building plan was in compliance with the stamped approved site. Please submit two copies of the stamped approved site plan, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next building plan submittal. 2) Engineering will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved and stamped site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. GENERAL COMMENTS: Please provide the building plan with a copy of the last approved site plan. Further comments may be generated upon resubmittal of the building plan review. For questions or to schedule an appointment I can be reached at 837-4929. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division COT Development Services |
| 10/02/2009 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/05/2009 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Denied:see comments for T09CM02360 |
| 10/06/2009 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/06/2009 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. According to Tucson Water the water pressure range at the address for this activity is 66 to 73 PSI. This is also consistent with the static water pressure noted for the wet sprinkler design criteria on sheet P2.1. Revise the water pressure calculations accordingly. Reference: Section A1.1, UPC 2006 and Section 604.1, IPC 2006. 2. Revise the water pressure calculations to include the minimum required pressure commensurate with the fixtures being installed The specified water closets and water fountain require a minimum static pressure of 20 PSI. Reference: Section 604.3, IPC 2006. 3. Provide cleanouts for the horizontal drains within the building, sized per Section 708.7, IPC 2006. 4. Provide a design for the mounting shelf for the water heater along with structural calculations to show that the water heater is safely supported. Reference: Section 301.2 IPC 2006. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/22/2009 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 10/22/2009 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |