Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: T09CM02358
Parcel: 140430130

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL TI

Permit Number - T09CM02358
Review Name: COMMERCIAL TI
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
09/04/2009 DAVE MANN FIRE REVIEW Denied Fire Comments
David Mann 837-7029

The site survey was stamped "preliminary not for construction".

Three set of drawings are required for the tank work. Product cut sheets and shop drawing and calculations for tanks etc. are required. A tank permit application is required.
09/14/2009 ERIC NEWCOMB BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. SHEET SB001: THE GENERAL NOTES INDICATE A SOIL REPORT WAS USED IN THE DESIGN OF THIS PROJECT. PROVIDE THAT REPORT FOR REVIEW.
2. SHEET SB101; SECTION 2: SHOULD THE NOTE ON THE CONTAINMENT WALL HEIGHT BE 3'-0" MAXIMUM CONTAINMENT WALL? THE STRUCTURAL DESIGN WAS FOR A 3' TALL WALL. VERIFY.
3. GENERAL: SPECIAL INSPECTION CERTIFICATES MUST INCLUDE THE NAME OF THE CERTIFIED INSPECTOR FOR EACH CATEGORY. FOR WELDING (PER YOUR NOTE), LIST THE NAME OF THE CERTIFIED FABRICATION SHOP AND THEIR CERTIFICATION NUMBER.
4. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES FOR ALL REVIEW COMMENTS.
09/17/2009 RMYERS1 WATER REVIEW Approved
09/17/2009 RICK MYERS PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Completed
09/17/2009 RICK MYERS MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Approved
09/18/2009 RAY MAJUTA ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Approved
10/02/2009 ELIZABETH EBERBACH ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied SUBJECT: TAA Fuel Containment project north of Aeropark Bl submittal Site Plan Engineering Review
LOCATION: T15S R14E Section 19
REVIEWER: Elizabeth Leibold
ACTIVITY NUMBER: T09CM02356

SUMMARY: The Fuel Containment plans and documentation were submitted to the City of Tucson for review. It is understood that this project will consist of removing and replacing tanks and reconstructing the pads and adjacent grades with elevated berms for containment of fuel if breach in the tanks were to occur. Planning & Development Services Department PDSD Engineering has reviewed the received items and does not recommend approval of the site plan without addressing the following conditions.

SITE PLAN COMMENTS:
1) DS Sec.11-01.4.1.C / 2-02.2.1.A.17, Tucson Code 26-8(a)(2)b: To clarify grading and to assure no adverse impact to downstream watershed, the following comments need to be addressed:
a) Sheet SS101 has an undecipherable scale; provide engineering scale for a grading plan sheet. Confirm that containment areas for basins provide sufficient fuel volume in these berm areas to contain any potential breach.
b) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.5: Provide local benchmark as basis of elevation on sheet SS101 is too far from project site. Show on a planview sheet on one of the civil sheets.
c) Clarify grading on sheet SS101 to show how fuel containment area is constructed and construction access to site.
d) Delineate Grading limits on planview, and provide grading disturbance limit line in a civil sheet legend. Assure sufficient area is provided around perimeter of berms to accommodate construction vehicular access.
e) Provide total disturbance area in square feet.
f) Provide estimated cut and fill quantities on civil grading plan or civil cover sheet.
g) Provide registrant sealed and signed grading plan.
h) Add note to grading plan that an as-built revised grading plan with closure completion documentation must be submitted prior to final PDSD Engineering Inspection approval.
i) Submit 2 copies of Geotechnical / Soils Reports which addresses compaction of berms.
2) Tucson Code Chap.26 Art.2: Submit 2 sets of SWPPP report and plan sheets for review & approval.

It will be necessary to provide grading application with resubmittal. Please address all comments prior to resubmittal and if you have questions, call me at 837-4934.

Elizabeth Leibold, PE
Civil Engineer
Engineering Division
Planning & Development Services Department

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
10/06/2009 CINDY AGUILAR OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
10/06/2009 SUE REEVES REJECT SHELF Completed