Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T09CM02354
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/07/2009 | BETH GRANT | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Completed | |
| 10/07/2009 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/07/2009 | ERIC NEWCOMB | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/07/2009 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/07/2009 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | NEED TO PROVIDE COMPLETED SPECIAL INSPECTION FORMS |
| 10/07/2009 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/07/2009 | DAVE MANN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/09/2009 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/23/2009 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/23/2009 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Comment not resolved. Revise the structural calculations for the exhaust hood to include the weights of the exhaust fan, grease duct, and the weight of one person working on the hood. Reference: Sections 302.1 and 507.6, IMC 2006. 2. Comment not resolved. Verify the equipment and duct weights with the mechanical engineer. Show the installed weights of the rooftop equipment and its associated ductwork on the drawing. Reference: Section 106.3.1, IMC 2006. 3. The hood is not located next to the existing masonry wall but is north of the existing building (see plan 1/A2), the wall appears to be built with wood framing according to elevation 3/A3. Show how the walls adjacent to the grease hood comply with Section 507.9, IMC 2006. 4. Revise the energy code compliance calculations, using Pima County < 4,000 feet instead of the town of Pima (its northwest of Safford, Arizona). 5. Provide calculations for the proposed U-factor for the roof marked as "other". Reference: Sections 101.4 and 104.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2006. 6. Show the specifications for the windows on the drawings, to match with the windows used on the energy calculations. Reference: Sections 101.4 and 104.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2006. |
| 10/28/2009 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Coordinate the design of the grease waste system so that the plumbing plan (P1) and the waste and vent riser diagram (P2) agree. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. 2. Indicate the materials to be used in the proposed plumbing systems for this activity. Reference: Sections 103.2.3, 301.1, 604.0, 701.0, 903.0, 1102.0, and 129.5, UPC 2006. 3. Show all of the required traps on the waste and vent riser diagram. 4. Provide a design for the mounting shelf for the water heater along with structural calculations to show that the water heater is safely supported. Reference: Sections 310.0 and 314.5, UPC 2006. 5. Revise the connection point of the waste pipe from the new lavatory from the water closet vent to the water closet drain; a vent pipe shall not be used as a waste pipe. Reference: Section 311.4, UPC 2006. 6. Provide material standards for all plumbing fixtures being provided by others. Reference: Section 401.1, UPC 2006. 7. Appliances (e.g. carbonated drink units) to be directly connected to the water supply system that do not have listed, integral backflow preventers or integral air gaps conforming to Table 6-3, UPC 2006 require backflow prevention. Reference: Sections 602.3, 603.0, and Table 6-2, UPC 2006. 8. Provide a vacuum relief for WH-1, a storage-type water heater located above fixture outlets. Reference: Section 608.7, UPC 2006. 9. Revise the water pressure calculations to include the pressure drop due to the reduced pressure backflow preventer and the water meter. Reference: Section 610.2, UPC 2006. 10. The proposed gravity grease interceptor is too small based on the UPC (and Pima County RWRD) sizing criteria. Resize the proposed grease interceptor per Section 1014.3.6, UPC 2006. 11. Size natural gas pipe per Section 1217.1, UPC 2006 or provide calculations demonstrating conformance to Section 1217.3, UPC 2006. Note that the heating value of the gas is approximately 1,000 BTU per cubic foot, not the 1,100 BTU per cubic foot used in the example shown in the UPC. Reference: Section 1216.3, UPC 2006. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11/05/2009 | CINDY AGUILAR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 11/05/2009 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |