Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL TI
Permit Number - T09CM02338
Review Name: COMMERCIAL TI
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/03/2009 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/29/2009 | ERIC NEWCOMB | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/29/2009 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. SHEET S1.0; STRUCTURAL NOTES: NOTE 7 INDICATES A SOIL REPORT WAS USED IN DETERMINING THE ALLOWABLE BEARING PRESSURE. PROVIDE THAT REPORT FOR REVIEW. 2. SHEET S2.0; GENERAL FOUNDATION NOTES: NOTE 5 INDICATES MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, AND PLUMBING DRAWINGS, WHICH ARE NOT RELEVANT TO THIS PROJECT. REMOVE NOTE. 3. SHEET S3.0; FRAMING PLAN: THE STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS INDICATE BEAM DB6 REQUIRES A W18X35 (SHEET 7) OR W14X26 (SHEET 18), AND THE DRAWING INDICATES A W14X26. CLARIFY. 4. GENERAL: PROVIDE COLUMN BASE PLATE AND ANCHOR BOLT DESIGN CALCULATIONS. 5. GENERAL: PROVIDE AN EXPLANATION OF THE LATERAL LOAD RESISTANCE FOR THE EARTHQUAKE FORCE (10,557 POUNDS) APPLIED TO THE STRUCTURE AS INDICATED IN THE CALCULATIONS (PAGE 20). DID NOT SEE WHERE ANY APPLIED MOMENT (20,187 FT/LBS) TO THE NEW COLUMN (M4) ON PAGES 23-42 WAS USED IN THE COLUMN DESIGN (DC1 ON PAGES 43-45). IS THIS LATERAL LOAD TO BE APPLIED AT BOTH GRIDS B.1 AND B.8? CLARIFY FOR THE REVIEWER. 6. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES FOR ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/01/2009 | CINDY AGUILAR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 10/01/2009 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |