Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Permit Number - T09CM02267
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/27/2009 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/28/2009 | RONALD BROWN | ADA | REVIEW | Denied | PREVIOUS COMMENTS NUMBERS 1 AND 2: 1. Please submit a letter summary of deferred submittals to Mr. LeeRay Hanley for approval. PREVIOUS COMMENT NUMBER 3: 4. Please reference sheet numbers G5, C1, C2, C4, C5, I1, E1, E4 and SWP3. PREVIOUS COMMENTS NUMBER 4: 5. As per ADAAG, Section 4.1.3. (19) (a), the companion fixed seat shall be identified by a sign or marker as outlined by Section 4.30 Signage. 6. It is also recommended that the each designated wheelchair area be marked with a perimeter outline stripe and the international accessible symbol as per Section 4.30. PREVIOUS COMMENTS NUMBERS 5 AND 6: 7. OK PREVIOUS COMMENTS NUMBER 7 8. Please revise the location of the accessible parking signage noted on detail 5/C-6 to be just outside the 18' depth of the parking space into the concrete curb/sidewalk area. END OF REVIEW |
| 10/30/2009 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 11/03/2009 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 11/03/2009 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 11/12/2009 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 11/17/2009 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | PROJECT: MORRIS UDALL PARK 7290 E TANQUE VERDE RD T09CM02267 FIELD LIGHTING The electrical plans have been denied for the following: 1. Provide cut sheets on fixtures being used,those being installed by Mussco need not be provided if they are obtaining their own permit. 2. Indicate on Sheet E-1 circuits to be assigned to lighting. 3. On sheet E-1, there are 10 P1 fixtures shown, also there are 6 W1 fixtures shown. In the lumen calculations on Sheet E-4 there are 8 P1 fixtures and 9 W1 fixtures ? 4. Cannot locate 2 F1 fixtures and 4 F2 fixtures shown on Sheet E-4, nor are they on the fixture schedule. 5. How is the 125% for continuous duty on lighting figured on the load calculations on Sheet E-2. 6. Is Panel C for the Concession Stand to be re-fed(existing), or new but to be installed by others? Ray T Majuta Elect Pln Ck, DPDS City of Tucson 11/08/09 Ray.Majuta @tucsonaz.gov |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12/01/2009 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 12/01/2009 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |