Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - SITE
Permit Number - T09CM02266
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/19/2009 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 11/24/2009 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/01/2009 | BIANCA RAMIREZ | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: December 1, 2009 SUBJECT: Site Plan TO: A23 Studios (Jose) LOCATION: 4261 E Irvington, T14S, R14E, Section 34, Ward 5 REVIEWERS: Bianca Ramirez, CFM ACTIVITY: T09CM02266 (Third Review) RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Site Plan, Drainage Report SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed site plan for the above referenced property. Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the site plan at this time. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the Site Plan. Site Plan: 1. Complied. 2. Complied 3. Complied 4. Complied 5. Complied 6. Complied 7. Complied 8. DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.12: Revise the site plan to show the required 6-foot wide sidewalk with curb along the street frontage of Irvington Road. Per the adopted Mayor and Counsel policy all sidewalks along MS&R right-of-ways for arterial and collector streets require 6-foot wide sidewalks. Response: Irvington is an arterial street - 6' constructed sidewalk is required. Revise plan to show sidewalk to be constructed. 9. Complied 10. Complied 11. Complied 12. Complied 13. Standard Note: Grading permit will be required. 14. Indicate and label existing and future right-of-way if existing and future right of way label existing/future. Response: Label future and existing right of way(s) as "future" and "existing". 15. Complied 16. Complied 17. DS Sec. 2-05.2.4.H.2: Provide the right-of-way (ROW) recordation information for Irvington Rd. Please identify recordation number on site plan. Response: Since other comments exist, please provide recordation information along street name. 18. Complied 19. Complied 20. Complied 21. Complied 22. Complied 23. Complied 24. Complied 25. Complied. 26. Standard Note: Be advised a permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. 27. Show a typical cross section of the P.A.A.L. or call out the percentage of slopes. Call out the GB at the driveway, if applicable. Response: Include information from revised Drainage Report showing offsite Q100 floodplain limits. (See Drainage Report Comments) 28. Complied 29. Complied General Note: For any development with 50 cy of cut or fill will require grading plan and for any site with area of disturbance of one acre or greater a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan will be required. It looks from aerial that grading has taken place on site already. "A grading permit and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP's) will likely be required for this project. In the event that they are needed, Submit 3 sets of grading and (2) SWPPP's with text, upon completion and submittal of a grading permit application. A grading permit may not be issued prior to site plan approval. Subsequent comments may be necessary, depending upon the nature and extent of revisions that occur to the plans". 30. Per site visit on 10/15/09 grading appears to be all the way to the property line. Address the following: a) Complied b) Complied c) Complied d) Complied 31. Provide cross section for basin and show spot elevations of basin bottom, sides and top of basin. In addition, provide second cross section for area rip rap area identified by keynotes 14 and 15. Response: Please provide top elevation of rip rap in keynote 15 or section B-B. 32. Specifically show spot elevations at the property line of driveway to show drainage is being kept on site. Response: Will be reviewed with resubmittal identifying Q 100 per corrections to Drainage Report. 33. Addition comments may be forthcoming. Drainage Report: 1. Off site drainage along Irvington does not appear to be addressed. Provide additional information in hydrology section addressing the off site flood conditions in Irvington. Response: Rough delineation of Basin B has an approximate basin of 166 acres. Estimation of 5 cfs per acre, results in over 800 cfs of flow. Rough estimation is not intended to be used in report, only for review purposes. Please account for flow from Basin B in Section 2.1 of Drainage Report. 2. Include floodplain limits on plan for any 100 year flows that are on site and show how the proposed design considers any impact from jurisdictional floodplain. Response: Identify Q100 floodplain limits taking drainage from Basin B into account. In addition, identify Q100 water surface elevation in Cross Section B-B. 3. Include all weather access design if floodplain limits encroach onto property. Response: Will look at this again once Drainage Report has taken Basin B Q100 into account. 4. Show existing and proposed flows entering and exist the site at all boundaries of the lot. Response: Q100 exiting the site (west property line) is indicated. However, Q100 entering the site needs to be indicated on site plan along boundary lines. 5. Not that grading design will need to be in compliance with revised hydrology. Please address hydrology prior to submitting grading plan to prevent duplication of comments. 6. Additional comments may be forthcoming. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4928 or Bianca.Ramirez@tucsonaz.gov Bianca C. Ramirez Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 837-4928 office (520) 879-8010 fax |
| 12/04/2009 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/11/2009 | CPIERCE1 | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Needs Review |