Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL-BLDG/FIRE/ZONING/ENG
Permit Number - T09CM01998
Review Name: COMMERCIAL-BLDG/FIRE/ZONING/ENG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/11/2009 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 08/13/2009 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. SHEET S4.01; DETAIL 20: DID NOT LOCATE SHAFT DIAMETER ON DRAWINGS, OR "DRILLED PIER SCHEDULE" AS REFERENCED IN NOTE 2. PROVIDE. 2. SHEET S5.01; SECTIONS 8 AND 9: PROVIDE THE THICKNESS OF THE FOOTING (OR A REFERENCE TO A NOTE/DETAIL). DID NOT LOCATE THE FOOTING SIZE INDICATED IN THE CALCULATION ON PAGE 402. 3. SHEET S5.01; SECTIONS 8 AND 9: PROVIDE THE THICKNESS OF THE WALL (OR A REFERENCE TO A NOTE/DETAIL). THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE AN 8" WALL. 4. CALCULATIONS: DID NOT LOCATE THE CALCULATIONS FOR THE SPREAD FOOTINGS F2, F3, F4, AND F5. PROVIDE ALONG WITH THE GRID LOCATION OF EACH FOOTING DESIGN. 5. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 08/14/2009 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 08/14/2009 | ERIC NEWCOMB | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 08/14/2009 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 08/14/2009 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 08/14/2009 | RSHERRY1 | WWM | REVIEW | Passed | No new wastewater-connected fixtures |
| 08/19/2009 | LAITH ALSHAMI | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Laith Alshami, Engineering and Floodplain Review, 08/19/2009, The Development Package and the Drainage Report have not been approved by Engineering yet. |
| 08/19/2009 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | Plans may not be approved until the development plan is aprpoved. |
| 08/20/2009 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Project:260 N Church, T09CM01998 Foundation and Demo The Electrical Plans for this project have been denied for the following: 1 . Sheet ES.1 Legend Note #2 indicates that the new 13.8 KV feeder be replaced to match existing, please indicate exactly the type of conductor is to be used, insulation type and voltage. A description should be given for installer to use and inspector to verify rather than attempt to match existing properties. 2. Provide information on type of splice kit to be used as per Legend Note #4 on Sheet ES.1. 3. Sheet ES.1 note indicates on Legend Note #10 that branch circuits for site lighting back to Panel 1HEE, list size conduit, conductor and number, and location of Panel 1Hee. 4. Sheet E2.2 shows a new 480 volt line, is this part of this project, if so where does it come from and where does it go ? Ray T Majuta Elect Pln Ck PDS City of Tucson 8/24/09 Ray.Majuta@tucsonaz.gov |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 08/26/2009 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |