Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL TI
Permit Number - T09CM01840
Review Name: COMMERCIAL TI
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/16/2009 | DAVE MANN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 07/17/2009 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 07/21/2009 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. SHEET A-1.0; DETAIL 2: PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR MASONRY FENCE AND FOUNDATION (EXCEEDS 6' IN HEIGHT). 2. SHEET A-1.0; SPECIFICATION NOTES: ADD MATERIAL SPECIFICATIONS FOR MASONRY, GROUT, CONCRETE, REINFORCING, AND METAL STUDS. 3. GENERAL: PROVIDE COMPARISON OF WEIGHTS OF MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT TO BE ADDED AGAINST WEIGHTS OF MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT TO BE REMOVED. CALCULATIONS MUST BE PROVIDED TO ENSURE EXISTING STRUCTURE AT ALL FLOORS AND ROOF ARE CAPABLE OF SUPPORTING THOSE LOADS. 4. GENERAL: PROVIDE COST ANALYSIS FOR THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING THE 20% MAXIMUM SPENT ON ACCESSIBILITY ISSUES PER THE 2006 IBC, SECTION 3409.7. |
| 07/21/2009 | JOHN WILLIAMS | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Passed | |
| 07/21/2009 | ERIC NEWCOMB | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. SEE BUILDING COMMENTS. |
| 07/27/2009 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 07/27/2009 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Clarify the relationship of the existing 1-1/4" gas pipe located east of the existing gas meter and serving the kitchen appliances with the existing gas meter. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. 2. Does the 2" gas pipe shown connected to the existing gas meter have a pressure regulator? Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. 3. How are gas pipes serving the existing water heaters and the furnace being replaced by F-1 related to the new and existing gas pipes? Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. 4. What is the capacity of the existing gas meter? Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. |
| 07/27/2009 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Replot sheets M-1, M-2, and M-3 to show the ductwork that is notated but not currently shown. Reference: Section 106.3.1, IMC 2006. 2. If the new condensate drains are to be connected to existing condensate drains (e.g. HP-9 and F-1), verify that the termination of the existing condensate drains complies with the current code requirements. Reference: Sections 102.4 and 307.2.1, IMC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson. |
| 08/10/2009 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | PROJECT:1448 E 1ST T09CM01840 TI Sorority Sheet E-6 list the service entrance conductors as 3 sets of 4# 500MCM's which amount to (380x3) =1140 amps.The 2005 NEC Section 240-4 C requires where if overcurrent device is rated over 800 amps, that the ampacity of the conductors it protects shall be equal to the overcurrent device or greater. Everything else ok. Ray T Majuta Elect Plan Ck PDS City of Tucson 8-11/09 Ray.Majuta@tucsonaz.gov |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 03/08/2010 | DELMA ROBEY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 03/08/2010 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |