Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL NEW
Permit Number - T09CM01750
Review Name: COMMERCIAL NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/10/2009 | SREEVES1 | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 07/13/2009 | DAVE MANN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 07/13/2009 | ARMANDO QUIROZ | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 07/13/2009 | LEERAY HANLY | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | REF PP 1 OF 8 CONFLICT BETWEEN GENERAL NOTES AND SPECIFICATIONS BOTH SHOULD REFERENCE 2006 IBC. REF PAGE 2 CODE INFORMATION PLEASE CLARIFY S-1 OR S-2 IF UNKNOWN THEN USE MOST RESTRICTIVE. 3/32 MIN FONT REQUIRED. PLEASE SPECIFY NUNBER OF LAYERS, SIZE AND TYPE OF GYP BOARD IN ARCHITECTURAL NOTES OR ENLARGE GA REF INSETS. |
| 07/15/2009 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: 2450 N. Flowing Wells Road T09CM01750 Building Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 11, 2009 1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning could not verify that the building plan was in compliance with the approved site plan.. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped site plan with the next building plan submittal. 3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved and stamped site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 C:\planning\grading\t09cm01750.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: |
| 07/15/2009 | BETH GRANT | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Passed | IMPACT FEES NOT REQUIRED |
| 07/16/2009 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 07/20/2009 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: July 21, 2009 SUBJECT: 2450 N Flowing Wells Road Site Plan- Engineering Review TO: Joe Maher LOCATION: T13S R13E Sec35 Ward 3 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: T09CM01750 (Site Plan) SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received and reviewed the site plan (T09CM01750) for the above referenced property. Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the plan sets at this time. The following items need to be addressed: SITE PLAN COMMENTS: 1) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.5: Revise the site plan to label the bearings for the dimensions provided for the property boundaries. 2) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.5: Clarify on the site plan that all dimensions from property lines to buildings are correct. Per aerial and field measurements it appears that the dimensions from the property line to the existing building (55') and from the existing building to the proposed metal building (81'4") are incorrect. Revise all dimensions on the site plan to reflect current conditions on the site. 3) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.8: Revise the site plan to dimension the minimum 24-foot PAAL widths at all locations on the site plan. The PAAL adjacent to the proposed metal structures must show the minimum width at 25-feet; 24-feet for the 2-way PAAL plus an additional 1-foot for setback from building to PAAL. 4) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.8: Revise the site plan to dimension the minimum required entry widths for all existing PAAL access points from Flowing Wells Road. 5) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.8: Provide a detail for all proposed parking spaces. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. Refer to DS Sec.3-05 for design criteria for parking spaces and access. 6) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.8: Clarify on the site plan all parking spaces that will require wheel stops to prevent vehicles from encroaching into any pedestrian access points, adjacent property boundaries or landscape areas. If the parking spaces are proposed at 18-feet then wheel stops will be required to allow for the required 2.5 foot overhang at these areas. 7) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.10: Revise the site plan to label and dimension the sight visibility triangles for all PAAL access points at the street. Provide the dimension for both the near and far side of the triangles per DS Sec.3-01.5.3. 8) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.12: Refer to comments from Ron Brown, RA Structural Plans Examiner for all onsite handicap and ADA requirements that apply to this project, if applicable. 9) DS Sec2-02.2.1.A.16: Provide flow arrows on the site plan to verify flow patterns across the site. 10) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.19: Revise the site plan to label Flowing Wells Road as public. 11) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.19: Revise the site plan to label the shown right-of-way for Flowing Wells Road as "Existing." Flowing Wells Road is a future MS&R Collector route with a future right-of-way width of 76-feet, due to the small size of the project the future right-of-way does not need to be labeled however for future clarity the existing ½-30-foot right-of-way does need to be labeled. 12) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.19: Revise the site plan to label and dimension the existing right-of-way for the existing un-paved area for Flowing Wells Road. 13) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.32: Revise the site plan to provide the refuse location along with a detail and dimensions for the required refuse containers. Refer to DS Sec.6-01 (Figure 3) for all required refuse enclosure dimensions and construction details. 14) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.32: Verify the maneuverability, label and dimension the required 36-foot and 50-foot radii for the refuse container; clearly label these in plan view. Provide the required 14-foot by 40-foot clear approach and verify the maximum allowed back up distance for maneuverability. Refer to DS Sec.6-01 for all refuse requirements. 15) Be advised that further comments may be forth coming on resubmittal of the site plan. BUILDING PLAN COMMENTS: 16) Engineering could not verify that the building plan was in compliance with a stamped approved site plan (T09CM01750). Please submit two copies of the stamped approved site plan, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next building plan submittal. 17) Engineering will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved and stamped site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. GENERAL COMMENTS: Please provide a revised site plan that addresses the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. Enclose "redlines" with the resubmittal package. Further comments may be generated upon resubmittal of the site plan review. For questions, or to schedule an appointment, I can be reached at 837-4929. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division COT Development Services |
| 07/23/2009 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 07/23/2009 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 07/23/2009 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 08/04/2009 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Passed |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 09/14/2009 | DELMA ROBEY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 09/14/2009 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |