Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESIDENTIAL BLDG/ZONING/ENGINE/NPPO
Permit Number - T09CM01709
Review Name: RESIDENTIAL BLDG/ZONING/ENGINE/NPPO
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/19/2009 | BIANCA RAMIREZ | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: August 28, 2009 SUBJECT: Addition of Garage and Porch TO: Sunny Hennig LOCATION: 10238 E Desert Flower Place, T13S, R15E, Section 35, Ward 2 REVIEWERS: Bianca Ramirez, CFM ACTIVITY: T09CM01709 (First Review) RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Site Plan and Drainage Statement SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed site plan and drainage statement for the above referenced property. Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the site plan or the drainage statement at this time. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the site plan and drainage statement. Site Plan: 1. Provide North arrow on site plan per D.S. 2-02.2.1.1. 2. Please label lot dimensions and bearings for northern property line per D.S. 2-02.2.1.5. 3. Show the limits of the 100-year floodplain and water surface elevation per D.S. 2-02.2.1.15. 4. Indicate cut & fill quantities on the site plan per D.S. 2-02.2.1.17 5. Indicate proposed finished floor elevation(s), and finished grades. DS Sec.2.02.2.1.A.16: 6. List the consulting engineers and the owner/developer on the plans with the pertinent information. 7. Provide legend and indicate all symbols on plans in legend. 8. Provide floodplain limits and erosion hazard setback limits on site plan. 9. Additional comments may be forthcoming. Drainage Statement: 1. Scour protection must be tied into the existing erosion hazards setback structure (line) on both the upstream and downstream side of proposed development. 2. Provide statement and demonstrate that there is No Adverse Impact to adjacent parcels. Specifically demonstrate "no rise" or ensure that and water surface elevation increases do not exceed 0,1' and also demonstrate that floodplain encroachment is not affecting the floodplain boundaries of surrounding properties. 3. Per Final Plat and Public Improvement Plans Q100 = 921 cfs. Please modify drainage statement to include the higher discharge. 4. Cross Section A and Cross Section B are indicating different velocities. Please modify Cross Section B to include the higher velocity. 5. Additional comments may be forthcoming. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4928 or Bianca.Ramirez@tucsonaz.gov Bianca C. Ramirez Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 837-4928 office (520) 879-8010 fax |
| 09/01/2009 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | provide a scaled site plan. remove incorrect setback lines. Indicate surrounding zones. Provide dimension from corner of garage to east property line. Provide north arrow and scale on site plan. |
| 09/02/2009 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide North arrow and scale on the site plan 2. Provide the location of the100-year floodplain on proposed development. 3. If the project proposes encroachment within the Regulated Areas, it shall conform to the following. Applicants are required to submit an Environmental Resource Report as defined in LUC 6.2.5 .The report must include, information detailed in DS 9-06.2.5.B. 4. Contact Patricia Gehlen 837-4919 or via e-mail at Patricia.Gahlen@tucsonaz.gov for assistance with the review process. 5. Additional comments may apply. |
| 09/11/2009 | CLAYTON TREVILLYAN | BUILDING-RESIDENTIAL | REVIEW | Denied | PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS Date: 9-14-09 Activity: T09CM01709 Address: 10238 E Desert Flower Pl Applicant: Sunny Henning Plan review for the above referenced structure has been completed. This letter reflects comments to be addressed. In order to facilitate a shorter back check time, we request that you please provide revised plans and calculations, along with a written response to each of the noted items indicating action taken. SCOPE OF REVIEW: The scope of this plan review includes architectural, electrical, plumbing, mechanical, and energy conservation. The purpose of this review is to verify compliance to the 2006 International Residential Code with local amendments. Other comment references may be derived from additional codes and standards adopted by The City of Tucson. All features have been checked only to the extent allowed by the submittals provided for review. All portions of this project are assumed to meet other departmental requirements, conditions, and concerns before permit approval. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS: 1. Provide two copies of the corrected set of drawings (no clouds or revision numbers please) along with a set of the first submission (cloud corrections on this set please). All corrections and revisions shall be made on original tracings or finished reproducible set. Pen or pencil corrections on final prints will not be acceptable. To avoid delays, ensure that all corrections have been made, are complete, and have been coordinated on all applicable detail and note sheets. 2. Any architect and/or engineer involved in the design of the structure shall seal the related sheets of plans, details and calculations in accordance with the rules of the State Board of Technical Registration. INCLUSIVE HOME DESIGN: 3. Correct all Inclusive Home Design notes that refer to 'unincorporated Pima County' as this project is located within Tucson City limits. 4. Provide all switches, receptacles, and controls within 48 inches of the floor but not less than 15 inches above the floor (To include thermostat controls), 1003.9. Note: this project is not required to comply with the City of Tucson Inclusive Home Design Ordinance. 5. Correct Inclusive Home Design notes that refer to the 2003 IRC. As of 6/12/2007 the City of Tucson has adopted the 2006 IRC. STRUCTURAL PLANS: 6. Justify the rafter size for the proposed design, R801.2. SECTIONS - DETAILS: 7. Provide section details for the masonry wall below structural posts to include all necessary reinforcement, R606.9. If you have any questions please contact: Clayton Trevillyan 520.837.4913 Residential Plan Review |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 09/28/2009 | CINDY AGUILAR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 09/28/2009 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |