Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T09CM01571
Parcel: 11807003D

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: RESUBMITTAL

Permit Number - T09CM01571
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
08/13/2009 DAVE MANN FIRE REVIEW Denied 1. With an occupancy load of 71, two exits are required as per section 1015.1. As per section 1014.2.2, exit egress may not pass through kitchens and must swing in the direction of travel.. Please redesign the rear exit so as not exiting through the kitchen. 1.
2. The occupant load calculations do not appear to be correct. A fixed seating calculation does not allow one person per 100 sf.
08/17/2009 RONALD BROWN BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Approved
08/17/2009 RONALD BROWN ZONING HC SITE REVIEW Approved
08/28/2009 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. The installation of a backwater valve necessitates the addition of a vent to comply with Section 904.1, UPC 2006. Vents located upstream from pumps, ejectors, backwater valves, or other devices that obstruct the free flow of gases between the building sewer and the outside atmosphere shall not be used for meeting the required cross-sectional vent area.
2. Relocate the reduced pressure backflow preventer for the future mister stub to conform to the access and clearance requirements of Section 603.3.4, UPC 2006.
3. Comment not resolved. The approved development plan does not show the location of the water meter, RPPBP, or the yard water piping to the building. Show the location of these items.
4. Provide roof drainage calculations and plans for the west roof; drainage is indicated on sheet A-15 but the gutter size is not provided on the building plans or on the metal building plans. Reference: Section 1101.11.1, UPC 2006.
5. Comment not resolved. The calculations shown on sheet A-17 for the size of the scuppers are not per the Section 1101.11.2.1, UPC 2006. The minimum scupper size for each side of the main roof would be 9.4" wide by a minimum of 6" high; the overflow for the collector box would be the same width as the scupper.
08/28/2009 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Denied Comment not resolved. The approved development plan does not show the location of the water meter, RPPBP, or the yard water piping to the building. Show the location of these items.
08/28/2009 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Comment not resolved. Revise air handler and duct connection detail (1/M-2) to reference the 2006 International Mechanical Code with Local Amendments, not the 2003 International Mechanical Code.
2. Comment not resolved; changing the notes on the program print-out does not change the calculations. Revise the energy code analysis, coordinating the building components used in the analysis with those shown on the drawing. (e.g., the drawing shows larger glass areas, including entrance doors; there are no wood-framed walls; most of the walls are framed at 24" on center; and the roof does not have continuous insulation) Reference: Section 302.2, IECC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson.
3. Comment not resolved; provide calculations for the concentrated point loads. Provide structural calculations to verify that the existing roof is capable of supporting the additional dead load due to the installation of the roof top equipment. Reference: Sections 106.3.1 and 302.1, IMC 2006.
4. Comment not resolved; provide calculations to show that the Z-purlins are capable of supporting the attached loads. Show how the fan coils are being connected to the building structure and provide calculations to show that the building structure is not being adversely affected. Reference: Section 302.1, IMC 2006.
5. Comment not resolved; the occupancy value for the dining area does not come from Table 403.3, IMC 2006. Justify the occupant load used to calculate the required ventilation for the dining area. The occupant load used for calculating the minimum required ventilation is to be based on Table 403.3, IMC 2003 or an approved engineering analysis of the specific occupancy type. Reference: Section 403.3, IMC 2006.
6. Comment not addressed. Provide calculations to show that the common ventilation system is sized in accordance with Section 403.3.2, IMC 2006.
7. The size of the grease ducts for EF-4, EF-5, and EF-6 have a velocity less than 1500 feet per minute. Correct the duct sizes. Reference: Sections 106.3.1 and 506.3.4, IMC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson.
8. Comment not resolved. Provide structural calculations and details to show that the Type I hoods are supported in accordance with Section 507.6, IMC 2006. Reference: Section 302.1, IMC 2006.
09/02/2009 RAY MAJUTA ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Approved
09/08/2009 GERRY KOZIOL WWM REVIEW Denied need manhole construction permit -review & approval 3rd floor PCWRD-Roy Montoya 740-6369

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
09/10/2009 DELMA ROBEY OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
09/10/2009 SUE REEVES REJECT SHELF Completed